ባህግና Bahgna 191፣ ኣገደስቲ ሰሙናዊ ዜናታት ሃገርናን ዞናናን ምስ ዝመላላእ ምዕራፋት ቃልሲ ዘርእቱ ርእሰ ዓንቀጽ ሰልፊ 04.02.2024
Written by Bahgna MediaMedia
ሕብረት ዝተበተነ ኩለ-መዳያዊ ዓቕሚ ዝእክብ ወሳኒ ናይ ዓወት መንገዲ እዩ። ኣድላይነት ሕብረት ኣብ ፖለቲካዊ ጉዕዞ ጥራይ ዘይኮነ፡ ኣብ ኩሉ መዓልታዊ ህይወት ሰባት ዝሰርሕ እዩ። ወለድና “ዝሓበራ ኣጻብዕቲ ኣርቃይ የጸንብዓ” ወይ “ኣሕዋት ምስ ዝሓብሩ ጸላኢ የባርሩ” ዝበልዎ ከኣ፡ ነዚ ዘንጸባርቕ እዩ። ክሳብ ክንድዚ ወሳኒ ግደ ዘለዎ ሓድነት ኮነ ሓቢርካ ምስራሕ ብቓልሲ ዝረጋገጽ እምበር፡ ብጥራዩ ወይ ብተፈጥሮ ዝወሃብ ኣይኮነን። ንምውሓሱ ኣብ ዝካየድ ቃልሲ ምጽውዋርን ምክእኣልን ቀንዲ ትግባራት እዮም።
ሓድነት ዓሚቕ ትርጉምን ትሕዝቶን ዝሓቖፈ ኮይኑ፡ እቲ ቀንዲ ሕመረቱ ፍልልይ ኣይሃሉ ማለት ዘይኮነ፡ ንፍልልያት ንኹልኻ ብዘርብሕ መስርሕ “እንካን ሃባን” ተኣማሚንካ ምምሕዳሩ እዩ። ሓድነት ሓንሳብ ምስ ኣረጋጊጽካዮ ኣኺልዎ ኢልካ እተራጥጠሉ ዘይኮነ፡ መምስ ዝገሃድ ሓድሽ ተርእዮታት ዝምዕብልን ቀጻሊ ሓለዋን ምሕዳስን ዘድልዮን እዩ። ዋጋ ዘኽፍል እው እዩ። እቲ ዝኽፈል ዋጋ ግና እምብዛ ከቢድን ዘይከኣልን ዘይኮነ፡ ንምክእኣልን ምጽውዋርን እኹል ዕድል ሂብካ፡ ንጸቢብነትን ስሰዐን ኣወጊድካ ብቐሊሉ ዝረጋገጽ ወሳኒ መሳርሒ እዩ።
ሓድነትን ሕብረትን ኩኩ ዘዝደለኻዮ ክትረክብን ዝበልካዮ ምሉእ ብምሉእ ክስምዓልካን ብምብሃግ ዝረጋገጽ ኣይኮነን። ኣብቲ ናይ ብዙሓት ርኢቶን ድሌትን ዝወዳደረሉ ሜዳ፡ ከምቲ ናትካ ሰዓሪ ክኾነልካ እትብህጎ፡ ከለኦት ሰብ ዝተፈልየ ድሌትን ባህግን ከም ዝወዳደሩኻ ኣብ ግምት ምእታው ግድን እዩ። ስለዚ ኣብቲ ሜዳ መወዳድርትኻ’ውን ብጽሒት ከም ዝህልዎ ተገንዚብካ ንናይ ርኢቶ ፍልልያት ዕድል ምሃብ ግድን እዩ። ምእንቲ ሓድነት ምቅላስ ቀሊል ዘይከውን ከኣ ፍልልያት ንምቅርራብ ዝግበር ቃልሲ ፍሉይ ውሕልነትን ተወፋይነትን ስለ ዝሓትት እዩ።
ምስቲ ናትካ ዝጻረር ሓሳብ ክንጸባረቕ እንከሎ፡ ምስምዑን መተካእታ ዝበልካዮ ምቕራብን እምበር ተቐዳዲምካ ምኹናኑ ሃናጺ ኣይኮነን። እቲ ካብ ናትካ ዝተፈልየ ሓሳብ ዘንጸባርቕ ወገን ካበየናይ ኩርናዕ ከም ዝነቐለ ምርድኡ ኣገዳሲ እዩ። ካብዚ ዕጉስ ኣስተብህሎ ነቒልካ ተመሊስካ ነቲ ንስኻ ርኢቶ ንምምዕባል ዝነቐልካሉ ኩርናዕ’ውን ዳግማይ ዳህሳስ ምግባር የድሊ። እቲ ፍልልይ ዝፈጠረ ጠንቂ ኣባኻ ክህሉ ተኽእሎ ከምዘሎ ኣብ ግምት ምእታው ከኣ ልቦና እዩ። በዚ መስርሕ ምክእኣልን ምጽውዋርን ከኣ እንተኾነ ፍልልያት ዘወግድ፡ ብውሕዱ ከኣ ነቲ ርሕቀት ዘጻብብ መዋጸኦ ምርካብ የኽእል።
እዚ ከተዘንትዎ እንከለኻ ቀሊል ዝመስል፡ ብግብሪ ግና ክሳብ ሎሚ ዋጋ ዘኽፈለናን ግዜ ዝወስደልናን ዘሎ ምውሓስ ሓቢርካ ምቅላስ፡ መንቀሊኡ ናይ ረብሓን ኣተሓሳስባን ተጻራርነት እዩ። እቲ ረብሓ ብነገራዊ ጸጋ ጥራይ ዝግለጽ ዘይኮነ፡ ናይ ኣተሓሳስባ፡ ናይ እምነት ……ወዘተ ዝኣመሰሉ ፍልልያት እውን ነናቶም ናይ ምርሕሓቕ ብጽሒት ኣለዎም። ኣብዚ መዳያት “ኣነ ክጥቀምን ናተይ ሓሳብ እዩ ብሉጽ ምባልን” በይኑ ዕንቅፋት ሓድነት ኣይከውንን እዩ። እቲ ዕንቅፋት ዝኸውን ካብ ናትካ ንዝተፈልየ ናይ ካለኦት ድሌትን ኣተሓሳስባን ንዘለዎም ወገናት ኣብ ክንዲ ምኽባር፡ “እዛ እምባይ መን ይወርሳ” ብዝብል ዕዉር ትዕቢት፡ ኣብ ክንዲ ኩልኻ እትርበሓሉ፡ ናይ“ሰዓራይ-ሰዓራይ”፡ ናይ “ሰዓራይ- ተሰዓራይ” ወይ ናይ “ተሰዓራይ ተሰዓራይ” መንገዲ ምምራጽ እዩ። ካብ ከምዚ ዝኣመሰለ ኣተሓሳስባ ንምውጻእ እምበኣር፡ ንምጽውዋርን ምክእኣልን ግቡእ ቦታ ምሃብን ሓቛፊ ሓሳብ ክትቅበል ድልዊ ምዃን ኣድላይ እዩ። ኣብ ርእሲዚ፡ ብፍላይ መልክዑን መልእኽቱን ብዘየገድስ ኣብ ውዱብ መስርዕ ቃልሲ ምስተጸመድካ፡ ኣቐዲምካ ብዝረዓምካዮም ዲሞክራስያዊ ኣዕኑድን ትካላዊ ኣሰራርሓን ምእዙዝ ምዃን እውን ድልዱል ዕርዲ መሕለዊ ሓድነት እዩ።
ኣብቲ ነዊሕ ጉዕዞ ቃልሲ ኤርትራውያ ካብ ዘየዕወትናዮም ሓደ፡ ዘተኣማምን ሓድነት ክንስርት ዘይምኽኣልና እዩ። ኣብዚ ዘይምዕዋትና ናጽነትን ልኡላውነትን ኤርትራ ከይነረጋገጽኳ እንተዘይዓገተና፡ ኣብ ካለኦት መዳያት ንከይንዕወት ዘዕንቅፈና ዘሎ እዩ። “ሓድነት ሓይሊ እዩ” እናጨራሕና፡ ከነዕውቶ ዘይምብቃዕና ጉዕዞ ሓድነት ዘይድፋእ እምባ ኮይኑና ከምዘሎ ዘርኢ’ዩ። ብሰንኪ’ቲ ኣብ ኢድና እናሃለወ ዘየዕወትናዮ ሓድነት፡ ኣዝዩ ብዙሕ ዋጋ ክንከፍል ምጽናሕናን ጋና ካብቲ ዕዳ ዘምውጻእናን ከኣ ዝሓለፈ ታሪኽና ኮነ ህልዊ ኩነታትና መስካሪ እዩ። ነዚ ኩነታትና ከም መድሃኒትካ ኣብ ኢድካ እንከሎ፡ ብዘይምጥቃምካ ብሕማም ምስቓይ ገይሮም ዝምስልዎ ወገናት ከኣ ሓቂ ኣለዎም።
ኣብ መስርሕ ቃልሲ ወለዶታት ክመላልኡ እንከለዉ፡ ተረካቢ ሕድሪ ካብቲ ዝተረከቦ ነቲ ዝጐደለ ናይ ምምላእን ነቲ ኣውንታ ዝያዳ ናይ ምርጓዱን ሓላፍነት ኣለዎ። ብመንጽርዚ ሎሚ ኣብ ቃልሲ ተጸሚዱ ዘሎ ኤርትራዊ መንእሰይ፡ በቲ ሓድሽ ኣተሓሳባኡን ውዑይ ጉልበቱን ክቓንዮምን ግቡእ መስርዕ ከትሕዞምን ካብ ዝግበኦ ምድልዳል ሓድነት ሓይልታት ለውጢ ኤርትራ እዩ። ኣብዚ መዳይዚ እቲ መንእሰይ ብመንጽር ምድልዳል ሓድነት፡ ካብቲ ቀዳማይ ወለዶ ዘይፍለ ምናልባት’ውን ዝሓመቐ እንተኮይኑ፡ ንእስነቱ ናይ ሓድሽ ኣተሓሳስባ ፈጣርነት ዘይኮነ፡ ተፈጥሮኣዊ ናይ ዕድመ ፍልልይ ኮይኑ እዩ ዝተርፍ። መንእሰይ ካብዚ ተሓታትነት ንክድሕን ብሓድሽ ኣተሓሳስባ ዝተሰነየ ምጽውዋርን ትዕግስትን ክዕጠቕ ይግበኦ። ትሕተ-ሃገራዊ ስምዒታትን መንነትን ካብ ሃገራዊ ፖለቲካዊ ኣተሓሳስባ ፈልዩ ብምርዳእ ከተግብር ክተብዕ ይግበኦ።
ሓድነት ቅድም ኣብ ኣእምሮ ናይቶም ብሓባር ክቃለሱ ዝወፍሩ እዩ ዝህነጽ። ምስ ነብሱ ተላዚቡ፡ ብዛዕባ ኣድላይነት ሓድነት፡ ኣተገባብርኡን ሓለውኡን፡ ከምኡ እውን ንምጽውዋርን ምትእምማንን ዝምልከት ብሱልን ተባዕን ተረድኦ ዘየማዕበለ ኣካል፡ ኣብ ዝኾነ ውዳበ ይሰለፍ ኣድማዒ ኣይከውንን እዩ። ምናልባት እውን ክሃንጽ ትጽቢት እናተገብረሉ ዓንቃፊ ናይ ምዃኑ ዕድሉ ክፉት እዩ።
ስለዚ ኣብ ዝኾነ ጸረ ህግደፍ ናይ ለውጢ ውዳበ ዘለኻ መንእሰይ ኤርትራ፡ ደው ኢልካ ኣስተውዕልን ምስ ሕልናኻ ተላዘብን። ብምጽውዋር ክፍታሕ ብዝኽእል ፍልልያት ተስፋ ብምቑራጽ ዘይኮነ፡ ብምስትውዓልን ኣስተብህሎን ተስፋ ሰኒቕካ፡ ካብ ዘጋጥም ብኩራት እሂምሂን መዋጸኦ መንገዲ ክትረክብ ብምሉእ ዓቕምኻ ክትስጉም መድረኽ ይጽወዓካ’ሎ። ሕብረት ኣብ ዘየብሉ ዓወት ከምዘየለ ከኣ ርሑቕ ከይከድካ፡ ካብቲ ክትደግሞ ዝይግበኣክ፡ ከፋፋሊ ተግባራት ህግደፍ ክትሙከር መድረኽ ይጠልበካ’ሎ።
ዜና ዕረፍቲ ኣቶ ተስፋልደት ኣለም መሓረና ብመሪር ሓዘን ሰሚዕናዮ። ኣብ መበል 67 ዓመት ዕድመኡ ዝዓረፈ ኣቶ ተስፋልደት፡ ድምጺ ኤርትራውያን ንምዃን መርበብ ሓበሬታ ኣስማሪኖ ዝመስረተን ዘመሓደረን ብዙሓት ብዛዕባ ሃገሮም ክጽሕፉን ክዛረቡ ኣፍደገ ዝኸፈተን፡ ከምኡ እውን ህላወ ተቓውሞ ኤርትራ ኣብ ምስፋሕ ግደኡ ዘበርከተ ናይ ሓርነት ተቓላሳይ እዩ ነይሩ።
ብዙሓት ድሕሪ ሞቱ ሓዘኖም ክገልጹ እንከለዉ ዝሃብዎ ምስክርነትን ንሕና’ውን እነረጋግጾን፡ ኣቶ ተስፋልደት ካለኦት ኣሰሩ ንክስዕቡ ብዘተፈላለዩ መንገድታት ዝሓገዘን ዘተባብዐን፡ ኣብ ጉዳይ ምሕላው ሰብኣዊ መሰልን ስደተኛታትን ኣዕዚዙ ዝግደስን ኣርሒቑ ዝጥምትን ለጋስን ሕያዋይን ብምንባሩ ይዝከር።
እንተኾነ ሞት ዘይተርፍ ዕዳ እዩ እሞ፡ ንዓኡ መንግስተሰማይ የዋርሶ፡ ንስድራቤቱን ፈተውቱን ድማ ናይ ሓዘኖም ተኻፈልቲ ምዃና እናገለጽና ጽንዓትን ኣኻእሎን ይሃቦም ንብል።
ቤት ጽሕፈት ዜና ሰዲህኤ
4 ጥሪ 2024
ፓርላማ ኢትዮጵያ ብ2 ለካቲት 2024 ኣብ ዘካየዶ ፍሉይ ርክብ፡ ንዝሓለፉ 6 ኣዋርሕ ኣብ ክልል ኣምሓራ ክትግበር ዝጸንሐ ኣዋጅ ህጹጽ ኩነታት እንደጋና ን4 ኣዋርሕ ንኽቕጽል ከም ዝወሰነ ተፈሊጡ። ዕድመ ናይቲ ኣተገባብራ ኣዋጅ ዝከታተል 7 ኣባላት ዘለዉዎ ኮሚተ እውን ብተመሳሳሊ ክቕጽል እቲ ኣኼባ ወሲሙ። እዚ ኣዋጅ ዝተናወሕ ኣብቲ ኣብ መንጎ ሓይሊ ምክልኻል ፈደራላዊ መግስቲ ኢትዮጵያን ዕጡቕ ሓይሊ ፋኖ ኣምሓራን ውግእ ኣብ ዝቐጸለሉ እዩ።
እቲ ፓርላማ፡ ብሚኒስተር ፍትሒ ኣብ ዝቐረበሉ ንድፊ ድሕሪ ምምይያጥ ብዝሃቦ ድምጺ ናይ ኣብዝሓ ደገፍ ምርካቡ ምዃኑ ካብቲ ፓርላማ ዝተረኽበ ዜና ሓቢሩ። እቲ ፓርላማ ነዚ ኣዋጅ ዘናወሓሉ ምኽንያት ኣብቲ ክልል ይካየድ ካብ ዘሎ ውግእ ወጺእካ፡ ሰላምን ምርግጋእን ንምውሓስ ምዃኑ ኣፍሊጡ።
እዚ ዝተናውሐ ኣዋጅ ህጹጽ ኩነታት፡ ኣብ 18 ነሃሰ 2023 ጸጥታዊ ኩነታት ክልል ኣምሓራ ኣጸጋሚ ምስ ኮነ፡ ንሽዱሽተ ኣዋርሕ ንክጸንሕ በቲ ፓርላማ ዝተወሰነ ነይሩ። ናይቲ ክልል ጸጥታ ናብ ዘስግእ ደረጃ ዝበጸሓሉ ምኽንያት ፈደራል መንግስቲ ኢትዮጵያ “ምክያድ ዳግመ-ውደባ” ብዝብል ዕጥቂ ናይቶም ኣብ ውግእ ትግራይ ዝተሳተፉ ፋኖ ንምፍታሕ ብዝገበሮም ምንቅስቓስን ዘጋጠሞ ተቓውሞን እዩ።
ኣብዚ እዋንዚ ኣብ ክልል ኣምሓራ፡ ይካየድ ብዘሎ ቀጻሊ ውግእ ህላወ መንግስቲ ብልጽግና ተዳኺሙ፡ ሓያሎ ከባብታት ኣብ ኢድ እቶም መንግስቲ “ጸበብቲ ኣምሓራ” ዝብሎም ፋኖ ኣትዩ ኣሎ። ብሰንክቲ ውግእ ብዙሓት ፖለቲከኛታት ኣምሓራ ዝእሰርሉ፡ ህይወት ብዙሓት ሲቪል ሰባት ዝጠፈኣሉን ትሕተ ቅርጻ ዝዓነወሉን ኮይኑ ዝቕጽል ዘሎ እዩ።
ናይዞም ብምስጢር ብኤርትራ ሓገዝ ይግበረሎም’ዩ ዝበሃሉ ፋኖ ዕላማ ኣብ መጻኢት ኢትዮጵያ ዘይንጹር ኮይኑ፡ ናይ ኣወዳድባ ጸገማት ከም ዘለዎም’ውን ብዙሓት ንኩነታቶም ብቐረባ ዝከታተሉ ፖለቲከኛታት ዝገልጽዎ እዩ።
ኣብ መወዳእታ ወርሒ ጥሪ 2024፡ ኣብ ኣሜሪካ፡ ካናዳ፡ ኤውሮጳን ኒውዜላንድን፡ ዝርከቡ ተወላዲ ዓፋር መበል 25 ዓመት ምምስራት ዲሞክራስያዊ ውድብ ዓፋር ቀይሕ ባሕሪ (ዲውዓቀባ) ከም ዘኽበሩ ብፌስቡክ ኣብ ዘውጽእዎ መግለጺ ኣፍሊጦም።
እቲ መግለጺ ተሳተፍቲ ኣብ ልዕሊ ህዝቢ ዓፋር ኣብ ዝሓለፈ 32 ዓመታት ዝተፈጸመ ጭቆና ይገድድ ከም ዘሎ ጠቒሱ፡ ህዝቢ ዓፋር ምስ መላእ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ ኣንጻር ጭቆና ዘካይዶ ዘሎ ቃልሲ ከሕይል ከም ዝጸውዑ እቲ ብ28 ጥሪ 2024 ብሓባር ዘውጽእዎ መግለጺ ጠቒሱ።
መግለጺኦም ህዝብና ካብ ጭቆና ክሳብ ዝናገፍ ቃልስና ክንቅጽል ኢና ኢሉ፡ ሕብረሰተሰብ ዓለም ብሓፈሻ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ ድማ ብፍላይ ህዝቢ ዓፋር ናይ ጸጋታቱ ተጠቃሚ ዝኾንሉ ኩነታት ንምፍጣር ተጽዕኖኦም ከሕይሉ ንጽውዕ ኢሉ።
ምስዚ ኣተሓሒዙ እቲ መግለጺ፡ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ ካብ ኣርዑት ጭቆና ህግደፍ ክሳብ ዝላቐቕ ሓቢሩ ንክቃለስ ኣዘኻኺሩ፡ ተሳተፍቲ ፖለቲካዊ ሓይልታት ኤርትራ (ፖሓኤ) በጺሕዎ ዘሎ ስምምዕ ከተግብሩ ድሉዋት ምዃኖም ብምርግጋጽ፡ ካለኦት ተቓወምቲ ሓይልታት ኤርትራ እው ቃልሶም ከሕይሉ ምጽወዖም ኣስፊሩ።
ከምኡ እውን ኣብቲ መግለጺኦም ጐባብቲ ሃገራትን ዓለም ለኻዊ ትካላትን ኣብ ዝተፈላለየ ቦታታት ንዘለዉ ስደተኛታትን ሓተቲ ዑቕባን ዓፋር ንክሕግዙን ኣንጻር ህግደፍ ኣብ ዝካየድ ቃልሲ ንክተሓባበሩን ጸዊዖም።
ኣብ መወዳእታ መግለጺኦም ድማ፡ ኣብ ወጻኢ ካብ ዝነብሩ መንእሰያት፡ ሲቪላዊ ማሕበራት፡ ዓበይቲ ዓዲ፡ ደቂ ኣንስትዮን ኣባላት ውድብ ዓፋር ቀይሕ ባሕርን ዝኣባላታት ኣብ ቀጻሊ ንዝካየድ ሰፊሕ ኮንፈረንስ እተሰናድእ ኮሚተ ከም ዝመረጹ እቲ መግለጺ ሓቢሩ፡
ህዝባዊ ወያነ ሓርነት ትግራይ (ህወሓት) ድሕሪ 41 መዓልታት ዝወሰደ ኣኼባ ምክያድ፡ ብ31 ጥሪ 2024 ሰፊሕ መግለጺ ኣውጺኡ። ኣብዚ ፍሉይ ኣኼባ ማእከላይ ኮሚተ፡ ብዘይካቶም ህሉዋት ኣባላቱ፡ ኣብ ሓላፍነት ዘይጸንሑ ነባራት ኣባላት መሪሕነትን ኣዘዝቲ ሰራዊት ትግራይን ተሳተፍቲ ምንባሮም እቲ መግለጺ ጠቒሱ።
ኣብዚ ኣኼባኡ ብዛዕባ ውድባውን ከባብያውን ምዕባለታት ብሰፊሑ ከም ዝገምገመ ኣብቲ መግለጺ ዝተጠቕሰ ኮይኑ፡ ብፍላይ ድማ ኣብዞም ዝስዕቡ ዛዕባታት ፍሉይ ቆላሕታ ሂቡ ዓሚቕ ሚዛን ከም ዘንበረ ኣብቲ መግለጺ ጠቒሱ። በዚ መሰረት፡
- ኣብዚ እዋንዚ ይረአ ንዘሎ ናይ ከባቢና ጂኦ-ፖለቲካዊ ምልውዋጥ ብመንጽር ኣብ ትግራይ ዘዕድሮ ጽልዋ መዚኑ።
- ዝጸንሖ ድኽመት ስትራተጂያዊ መሪሕነት ንዝተፈላለዩ ድኽመታትን ምክፍፋላት ኣቃሊዕዎ ከም ዝጸንሐ ተገንዚቡ፡ ካብዚ ንምውጻእ እንታይ ክግበር ከም ዘለዎ ብምምዛን ናብ ጉባአ ዘብጸሖ ምትዕርራይ ኣካይዱ፡
- ኣብ መስርሕ ትግባረ ስምምዕ ፕሪቶርያ፡ ዕንቅፋታት ከም ዘጋጠሙ፡ ብሰንኩ ድማ ዝተጐብጠ መሬት ትግራይ ከምዘይተመልሰ፡ ብሰንኪ ውግእ ዝተመዛበሉ ተጋሩ ናብ መረብቶም ከምዘይተመልሱን ጉዳይ ተሓታትነት ከምዘይተሰርሓሉን ኣስሚርሉ።
- ኣብ መንጎ ውድብን መንግስትን ዝነበረ ምትሕውዋስ ክንጸርን ክልቲኦም ኣካላት ነናቶም ዝሰርሕሉ ኣገባብ ንክንጸር ተረዳዲኡ፡
- እናዓመቐ ዝኸይድ ምትዕርራይ ስትራተጅያዊ መሪሕነት ንምፍጣር ምትዕርራይ ኣካይዱ
- ናብ ቀጻሊ ጉባአ ዘብጽሑ ምድላዋት ብዓንተቦ ክዕመሙ ዘኽእል መደብ ኣውጺኡ
እቲ መግለጺ ናብ ዝተፈላለዩ ኣካላት ናይ ቃልሲ መጸዋዕታ ዘውጸአ ኮይኑ፡ ንህዝቢ ኤርትራ ብዝምልከት ድማ፡ “ኣብ ዝሓለፈ ግዜ ብሓባር ኣንጻር ጸላኢ ተቓሊስና ተዓዊትና። ደሓር ግና እቲ መስርሕ ተኾሊፉስ ክሳራውን ኣስዒቡልና። ካብዚ ሓሊፉ ኣብ ዝሓለፉ 5 ዓመታት ኣብ ልዕሊ ህዝቢ ትግራይ ይቕረ ዘይበሃሎ በደል ተፈጺሙ። ስለዚ እቲ ጸረ ሰላም ተግባራት ከይቅጽልን ሰራዊት ኤርትራ ካብ ዝሓዞ መሬት ትግራይ ክወጽእን ቃልስኻ ቀጽል። ነቶም ኣብ ጸገም ህዝቢ ትግራይ ደገፍን ምትሕብባርን ዝገብሩ ዘለዉ ኤርትራውያ ከኣ ነመጉሶም” ዝብል መልእኽቲ ኣስፊሩ።
ማእከላይ ኮሚተ ህወሓት፡ ኣብዚ ህዝቢ ትግራይ ኣብ ቅልውላው ዝርከበሉ ዘሎ ግዜ፡ ንክንድዚ መዓልታት ኣብ ኣኼባ ምጽንሑ ብዝተፈላለዩ ወገናት ተቓውሞ ከጋጥሞ ከም ዝጸንሐ ዝዝከር እዩ።
ኣብ ክልል ትግራይ ብዛዕባ’ሎ ጥሜት ዝወጽእ ሓበሬታ ዝተፈላለየ ምዃኑ ማሕበራት ረዲአት ግቡእ ሓገዝ ከየቕርባ ዕንቅፋት ካብ ዝኾነን ምኽያታት ኮይኑ ከም ዘሎ፡ ትካል “ሓባስ ንብዓት ኢትዮጵያ” ብዘካየዶ መጽናዕቲ ክርዳእ ከም ዝኸኣለ ኣፍሊጡ። እዚ ተጸዋዕነቱ ናብ ፓርላማ ዝኾነ ሰብኣዊ ትካል፡ ብዛዕብቲ ኣብ ትግራይ ዘሎ ጥሜት ዝወጽእ ዘሎ ኣሃዛት፡ ብፈደራል መንግስቲ ኢትዮጵያ 2.2 ሚልዮን ሰባት ብክልል ትግራይ ከኣ 4.2 ሚልዮን ሰባት ምዃኑ ነቲ ሓቀኛ ኣሃዝ ንምርካ መጽናዕቲ ከካይድ ከም ዝደረኾ ኣፍሊጡ።
እቲ ሓቀኛ ኣሃዝ ናብቲ ብክልል ትግራይ ዝቐረበ ዝተጸገዐ ምዃኑ ጠቒሱ፡ ፈደራል መንግስቲ “ኣብ ትግራይ ናብ ሞት ዝበጸሐ ጥሜት የለን” ዝበሎ ግጉይ ምዃኑ ከም ዘረጋገጸን ሓቢሩ። ኣብ ትግራይ ካብተን ከቢድ ሓደጋ ጥሜት ኣንጸላልይወን ዘሎ 4ተ ዞባታት ንወረዳታት ኣበርግለን ዋጀራትን ከም ኣብነት ወሲዱ፡ ብሰንኪ ጥሜት ልዕሊ 15 ሺሕ ሰባት ካብ መረበቶም ክመዛበሉ እንከለዉ፡ 355 ሰባት ሞይቶም፡ 3, 728 ተመሃሮ ከኣ ትምህርቶም ከም ዘቋረጹ ኣረጋጊጹ።
ትካል ሓባሲ ንብዓት ኣተሓሒዙ ብዘካየዶ መጽናዕቲ ኣሰፋፍራ ናይቶም ስደተኛታት ንገዛእ ርእሱ ረዲአት ብስሩዕ ንምቕራብ ኣጸጋሚ ከም ዝኾነ ብምጥቃስ፡ ዝምልከቶም ናይ ፈደራልን ክልልን ኣካላት ቅድሚ ነቶም ሓገዝ ከቕርቡ ዝግበኦም ዘይመንግስታዊ ትካላት ምውቃስ ዘድሊ ምትዕርራይ ምግባር ከም ዝግበኦም ኣተሓሳሲቡ።
ሓለፍቲ ምምሕዳር ትግራይ ኣቐዲሙ’ኳ ኣብቲ ክልል ኣጋጢሙ ዘሎ ጥሜት ምስቲ ብ1985 ኣስታት ሓደ ሚልዮን ሰባት ከም ዝቐተለ ዝንገረሉ ጥሜት ተመሳሳልነት ከም ዘለዎ ክገልጹ እንተጸንሑ፡ መንግስታዊ ትካላት ኢትዮጵያ ግና ናብ ሞት ዘብጽሕ ጥሜት የለን ኢለን ክከራኸራ ከም ዝጸንሐ ዝዝከር እዩ።
ጥሜት ኣብ ኢትዮጵያ ኣብ ትግራይ ጥራይ ዘይኮነ፡ ብፍላይ ኣብተን ኣብ ውግእ ዘለዋ ክልላት ኣምሓራን ኦሮሚያን ሞት የስዕብ ከም ዘሎ’ውን ሓበሬታ ኣሎ።
More...
ዋና ጸሓፊ ኮሚሽን ሕብረት ኣፍሪቃ ሙሳ ፋቂ፡ ኣብቲ 29 ጥሪ 2024 ኣብ ከተማ ሮም ዝተጋበአ ርክብ ኣፍሪቃን ኢጣልያን “ኣፍሪቃውያን ድኻታት ኣይኮናን” ከም ዝበሉ ካብ ሮይተርስ ዝተረኽበ ዜና ኣፍሊጡ። እቶም ኮሚሽነር ከምዚ ዝበሉ፡ ኣብቲ ቀዳመይቲ ሚኒስተር ኢጣልያ ጆርጂያ ሜሎኒ ናይቲ ርክብ ዓላማ ዘፋለጣሉ መኽፈቲ ኣኼባ እዩ።
ኮሚሽነር ሙሳ ፋቒ ንተበግሶ ርክብ ኣፍሪቃን ኢጣልያን ናይ ሓባር ረብሓን ድልዱል ዝምድናን ስለ ዝፈጥር ኣመስጊኖም፡ እንተኾነ ኣፍሪቃውያን ብዘይትግበሩ መብጸዓታት ኣይንሕጐስን ኢና ኢሎም። ኣተሓሒዞም ድማ እቲ ሓድሽ ቅዲ ዝምድና ምዕሩይ መንገዲ ክሕዝ ከም ዝግበኦ ጠቒሶም፡ “ኣፍሪቃ ለምንቲ ኣይኮናን” ንእትብል ሓረግ ከኣ ደጋጊሞም ከም ዝጠቐስዋ እቲ ዜና ሓቢሩ።
ቀዳመይቲ ሚኒስተር ኢጣልያ ብወገነን ንዕላማቲ ርክብ ከፋልጣ እንከለዋ፡ “ኣብ መስርሕ ዝምድናና ምስ ኣፍሪቃ ሓድሽ ታሪኽ ክጸሓፍ ንደሊ ኣለና” ኢለን። ኣብ ዝሓለፈ ግዜ፡ ተፈጥሮኣዊ ሃብታን መንእሰይ ሓይሊ ሰባን ዝዘንገዐ፡ “ኣፍሪቃ ድኻ እያ” ዝብል ዝንቡዕ ታሪኽ ክንገር ጸኒሑ እዩ ኢለን።
ኣተሓሒዘን ከኣ ካብ ኣፍሪቃ ዝረአ ዘሎ ዋሕዚ ዝደተኛታት፡ ነቲ ጠንቁ ዝኸውን ዘሎ ኣብቲ ቦታ እንተዘይፈዊስናዮ ጠጠው ዝብል ኣይኮነን ክብላ ገሊጸንኦ።
ኣብዚ ቀዳመይቲ ሚኒስተር ኢጣልያ ጆርጂያ ሜሎኒ፡ ነቲ ምስ ኣፍሪቃ ክስራሕ ተታሒዙ ዘሎ ዝያዳ ናብ ጸዓትን ትምህርትን ዘተኩር ፕሮጀክት 5.5 ቢልዮን ዩሮ ተመዲብሉ ከም ዘሎ ዝገለጻሉ መድረኽ፡ ወከልቲ 45 ሃገራት ኣፍሪቃ ተሳቲፎም። ካብቶም ዝተሳተፉ መራሕቲ ኣፍሪቃ ናይ ኤርትራ፡ ኢትዮጵያ፡ ሶማሊያን ኬንያን ይርከብዎም። ብዘካዚ ዝተፈላለዩ ላዕለዎት ሓለፍቲ ሕብረት ኤውሮጳ እውን ተሳቲፎም
ርእሰ-ዓንቀጽ ሰዲህኤ
“ቃልስና መሪርን ነዊሕ እዩ፡ ዓውትና ግና ናይ ግድን እዩ” ዝብል፡ ምስ ግዜ ካብ ዘይኣረጉ ረዚን መልእኽቲ ዘለዎም ጭረሖታት ህዝቢ ኤርትራ እዩ። ቃልሲ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ ነዊሕ ጥራይ ዘይኮነ፡ ብምዕራፋት ዝተኸፋፈለን ኣንጻር ብዙሓት ጸላእቲ ዝመከተን ምዃኡ ድማ ታሪኽና ይምስክሮ። እዚ ነዊሕ ቃልሲ በቲ በብግዜኡ ዝርአ ምዕባለታት ዝተቓነየ ነይሩን ኣሎን። ተሳትፎ ህዝቢ ኤርትራን ጽንዓት ፖለቲካዊ ውዳበታቱን እውን መሰረቶም ከይሰሓቱ ዝተፈላለዩ መልከዓት መኸተ ሒዞም ክጐዓዙ ዝጸንሑ እዮም።
ነፍሲ ወከፍ ምዕራፍ ቃልሲ፡ በብመድረኹ ቀዳምነታት ነይረሞን ኣለዉዎን። ኣብ ሓደ መድረኽ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ ተወዲቡ ብፖለቲካውን ሕጋውን ኣገባብ ናጽነቱ ከረጋግጽ ተቓሊሱ። እንተኾነ ብሰንኪ ኣብያ ገዛእትን ዘራያቶም ሰብ ረብሓን በቲ ዝተለሞ ዘይጐነጻዊ ምርጫ ኣይተዓወተን። ካልእ መተካእታ ምስ ሰኣነ ከኣ ናብቲ ካልእ ምርጫ ዘይነበሮ በሊሕ ምዕራፍ ብረታዊ ሰውራ ክኣቱ ተገዲዱ። ኣብዚ ጐነጻዊ መድረኽ’ውን ተሳትፎን ተወፋይነትን ህዝቢ ኤርትራ በመንጽርቲ ሽዑ ከቢብዎ ዝነበረ ኩነታት ክዕቀን እንከሎ ኣዝዩ ዝነኣድን ንካለኦት ኣብነት ዝኾነን ነይሩ።
ህዝቢ ኤርትራ ሳላ ኣብቲ መተካእታ ምስ ሰኣነ ዝኣተዎ ሰውራ ህይወትን ንዋትን ኮነ ግዜ ከይበቐቐ ዝኸፈሎ ንኡድ ሓርበኛዊ ኣበርክቶ ተዓዊቱ። እቲ ብረታዊ ሰውራ መመላእታ ናይቲ ቅድሚኡ ኣብ ዝተራእየ ተሳትፎ ዝተቐስመ ተመኩሮ እምበር፡ “ሀ” ኢሉ ዝጀመረን በይኑ ዝተንጠልጠለን ኣይነበረን። ብዙሓት ካብቶም መስረቲ ናይቲ ቃልሲ’ውን ናይ ክልተ ምዕራፋት ጀጋኑ እምበር ሓደስቲ ኣይነበሩን። ብሳላዚ ብዙሕ ውረድ ደይብ ዘይተፈልዮ ምዕራፍ ቃልሲ ድማ ናጽነት ኤርትራ ተረጋጊጹ፡ ብውሳነ ህዝባ ከኣ ኣብ ድልዱል ልኡላዊ ሕጋዊ ባይታ ተሰሪታ። ክሳብ ሎሚ’ኳ ክነቓንቕዎ ዝደናደኑ ዘይቀበጹ ወገናት እንተለዉ እቲ ሽኻል ልኡላውነትና ኣዝዩ ጽኑዕ እዩ። ምስዚ ግና ቀጻልነታ ንምዕቃብ ሓለዋ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ ዘይፍለያ እዩ። ናይዚ ሎሚ ምእንቲ ሰላምን ዲሞክራስን ነካይዶ ዘለና ፍትሓዊ ሓርነታዊ ቃልሲ መሰረት ከኣ ንሱ እቲ ኣዕሚቑ ዝተተኽለ ናጽነትን ልኡላውነትን ኤርትራ እዩ። በዚ ኢና ከኣ ቃልሲ ንሓርነት መቐጸልታን መመላእታን ናይቲ ኣብ ምርግጋጽ ናጽነትና ዝተኸፍለ ዋጋ እዩ እንብል።
ከምቲ ኣብ ግዜ ብረታዊ ቃልሲ፡ “ድሕሪ ናጽነት’ውን ግድል ኣሎ፡ መሰላት ህዝብና ንክሕሎ” ዝብል ዜማ ዝዝመር ዝነበረ፡ ድሕሪ ናጽነት ቃልሲ ምእንቲ ሓርነት ከም ዝህሉ ኣብ መብዛሕትኦም ኤርትራውያን ግንዛበ ነይሩ እዩ። እቲ ናይ ድሕሪ ናጽነት ቃልሲ፡ ኤርትራውያን ብሓባር “በሰላ ውግእ ዘሕውይሉ፡ ዝፈረሰ ዝሃንጽሉ፡ ዝተሰደደ ዜጋ ናብ ዓዱ ዝምልስሉ፡ ብመግዛእቲ ዝተነፍገ መሰላት ዝምልስሉ፡ ኤርትራዊ ንብዓቱ ዝሕበሰሉ፡ ኣብ ገዛእ መሬቱ ኣደልዲሉ ዝረግጸሉን ዓው ኢሉ ዝዛርበሉን” ክኸውን ናይ መብዛሕትኡ እምንቶ ነይሩ። እንተኾነ እቲ ቃልሲ ንሓርነት ኣብ ሕድሕድ ኤርትራውያን ኮይኑ፡ በቲ ሓደ ወገን ንሕውየትን ሓርነትን ዝሓሊ፡ በቲ ካልእ ከኣ ሓደራ ህዝብን ስዉኣቱን ዝጠልምን ሜላን ቃናን ቀይሩ ህይወት ግዜ መግዛእቲ ዘቐጽል ኮይና ተሰሊፍና ኣለና። ናይዚ ተጻራሪ ኣሰላልፋ ጠንቂ ከኣ ኢሳያስ ኣፈወርቅን ግንባሩን እዮም። በዚ ከኣ እነሆ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ ናብ ዘይተጸበናዮን ዘይብሃጎን ክቡር ዋጋ ዘኽፍሎ ዘሎ ቃልሲ ኣትዩ። እዚ ሎሚ ነካይዶ ዘለና ቃልሲ ምእንቲ ሓርነት’ውን መመላእታ ናይቲ ቅድሚኡ ዝተኻየደ ቃልሲ ኮይኑ፡ በቲ ናይ ሽዑ ተመኩሮን ውርሻን ዝስውድን ዝህብትምን እምበር፡ ኣብ ሎሚ ጥራይ ዘትከለ ኣይኮነን።
ጉዕዞ ቃልስና፡ ኣብቲ መስርሕ ነቲ ዝነብረሉ መድረኽ ብዝምጥኑ ስትራተጅን ሜላን እናተሰነየ፡ ዝቕጽለ እዩ። እቶም ተዋሳእቲ ከኣ ነቲ ዝነበርሉ ፖለቲካዊ ሃዋህው ክመስሉ ናይ ግድን እዩ። ከምዚ ስለ ዝኾነ እዩ፡ ከኣ ነቶም ነባራት ኣብቲ ሎሚ ዘለኻዮ ምዕባለ ኮይንካ “ከምዚ ክገብሩ ነይርዎም” እናበልካ ምንቃፍን ንኣበርክተኦም ክብሪ ዘይምሃብን ቅኑዕ ዘይከውን። ንምዕባለታት ትማሊ፡ ሎምን መጻእን ኣገናዚብካ ኣገዳስነት መስርሕ ምምልላእ ምርዳእ ከኣ ናይ ግድን እዩ። ግና ድማ እቲ ምምልላእ ኣዝዩ ልሙጽ ዘይኮነ ኣብ ሕድሕድካ ዘበላልሕ ምውጣጥ ዘይፍለዮ ሓርጉጽጎጽ ምዃኑ ምስትውዓል የድሊ።
ከምቲ “ሕልሚ ፈሪሕካ ከይደቀስካ ነይሕደር” ዝበሃል፡ ነዚ ኣብ ሕድሕድካ ተመኩሮ ዘቕስም ናይ ወለዶታት ምውጣጥ እተመሕድሮ እምበር እትሃድመሉ መስርሕ ኣይኮነን። ኣብዚ ምስግጋር ግደ ኣውረስትን ወረስትን ዘይነጻጸልኳ እንተኾነ፡ ብፍላይ ግደ ናቲ ተረካቢ ሕድሪ መንእሰይ ዓብይ ምዃኑ ምስትውዓል ኣድላይ እዩ። ኩሉ ከምቲ ዝደለኻዮ ስለ ዘይኮነልካ ካብዚ ናይ ምርኽኻብ ሓርፋፍ መድረኽ ንክትሃድም፡ “ምቅላስ ከሊኦምና” ኢልካ ውዳበ ፈሊኻ ጀማሪ ምዃን መሰል’ኳ እንተኾነ፡ ምርባሕ ውዳበታት መፍትሒ ስለ ዘይከውን ዝተባባዕ ኣይኮነን።
ነቲ ዘዕንቀፈካ ብጸዋርን ውሕሉልን ቃልሲ ብምእላይ፡ ነቲ ነባር ተመኩሮ ምስቲ ሓድሽ ኣተሓሳስባ ኣዋሲብካ ምስጋሩ እዩ እቲ ቁኑዕ ኣገባብ። ነቲ ምእንቲ ሓርነት ክትቃለስ እንከለኻ ጽኑዕ መንጠሪ መሰረት ዝኾነካ ባይታ ናጽነትን ልኡላውነትን ንዓኡ ዘውሓሱ ሓርበኛታትን ጓሲኻዮም ምኻድ፡ ምናልባት እውን ምጽላሞምን ምንእኣሶምን ግና ምምልላእ ዘይቅበል ኣብ ዝተቖራረጸ መስርሕን ተመኩሮን ዘኹድድ ኣገባብ ምምራጽ ቅቡል ኣይኮነን። እቶም ኣውረስቲ’ውን እሱራት ናይቲ ኣብ ግዜ ንእሰቶም ዝነበረ ተመኩሮ ከይኮኑ፡ ግደ ናይቲ ዘቐጽል ሓድሽ ወለዶ ምስዚ ዝነብረሉ ዘሎ ምዕባለ ክርድእሉ ይግብኦም።
ህግደፍ በዚ ናይ ነባርን ሓድሽን ምምልላእ ዝፍጠርን ኣጻሩ ዝስለፍን ናይ ለውጢ ዓቕሚ ስለ ዝሰግእ፡ ነቶም ኣብቲ መስርሕ ዝዋስኡ ነባራትን መንእሰያትን ክተፋነኑን ነናቶም ጫፋት ሒዞም ክጓተቱን ድሌቱ ምዃኑ ርዱእ እዩ። ስለዚ ነባራትናን መንእሰያትናን፡ ህግደፍ ንምውጋድ እንቃለስ ካብ ኮና፡ በቲ ህግደፍ ኣንጻርና ዝዝርገሖ መጻወዲያ ከይንተሓዝ እሞ ዕድሜኡ ነዊሑ ወጽዓ ህዝብና ከይናዋሕ ነስተውዕል።
Full Text: UN Panel of Experts Report on Sudan
Written by Martin Plaut|
|
Martin Plaut posted: " Source: Sudan War Monitor Plus: Updates on political and military developments 23 JAN 2024 A report by a five-member panel of researchers appointed by the UN Security Council details conflict dynamics in Darfur and violations of a long-stand" Martin Plaut Read on blog or reader |
Full Text: UN Panel of Experts Report on Sudan
Source: Sudan War Monitor Plus: Updates on political and military developments23 JAN 2024
A report by a five-member panel of researchers appointed by the UN Security Council details conflict dynamics in Darfur and violations of a long-standing UN arms embargo, including by the United Arab Emirates. The report estimates the death toll of the ethnic cleansing in El Geneina last year at 10,000 to 15,000—substantially higher than previous estimates. This toll, if accurate, would exceed the Srebrenica massacre of 1995, which is remembered as the worst mass murder in Europe since World War II. The New York Times, Reuters, and Bloomberg first reported this and other findings of the UN Panel several days ago, but this is the first time that the report is published in full. The UN has not yet officially released the document. The UN Panel of Experts collected evidence of the El Geneina killings from over 120 victims and eyewitnesses, as well as documentary and photographic evidence already gathered by civil society organizations and UN agencies. The Panel concluded, “The attacks were planned, coordinated, and executed by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and their allied Arab militias.” Like the Hutu against Tutsi massacres of 1994, these killings were carried out on an ethnic basis by the predominantly Arab RSF against the Masalit tribe. Recruitment and preparations for the massacres began before the outbreak of the civil war between the RSF and the Sudan Armed Forces (SAF), demonstrating the close connection between the RSF’s bid for national power and the more local battle for ethnic supremacy in Darfur. The UN report stated, “The largest mobilization (of Arab fighters) within El Geneina took place weeks before 15 April, when clashes in Khartoum commenced, and went on until 24 April (phase 1 of the conflict in El Geneina). These militias were assembled in various areas in El Geneina and surrounding areas… RSF established local headquarters in neighborhoods that served as operations centers.” “In addition, allied militias established their own operational centres which were frequently visited by RSF officers for coordination purposes.” These details add to the growing body of evidence implicating the RSF directly in this mass atrocity, including Sirba, Mornei, and Masterei. Despite the ethnic nature of the killings, the report stressed, “It is important to note that not all members of the Arab communities were involved in the violence, and that many actively protected the Masalit people. Masalit individuals found refuge in the homes of their Arab neighbors, who assisted them in escaping to Adré, Chad.”
UN Panel of Experts Report on Sudan S/2023/93 18.6MB ∙ PDF file Download Pursuant to Security Council Resolution 2676 (2023) UAE supplied weapons to the perpetratorsCiting sources among armed groups and tribal leaders in eastern Chad and Darfur, the UN Panel corroborated earlier reports that the United Arab Emirates (UAE) provided weapons to the Rapid Support Forces. The oil-rich Gulf Arab nation had a relationship with the RSF since before the current war, having employed its members as mercenaries in Yemen. Flights trackers documented the cargo flights from the UAE to the eastern Chadian town of Amdjaras. From there, the local sources reported that weapons and ammunition were loaded on trucks and taken into Darfur in small convoys, where they were handed over to the RSF. “RSF transported the shipments to their base in Zuruk (Um Baru Locality, North Darfur). Some weapons were then distributed to RSF positions in Darfur, while most were transported from Zuruk to Khartoum through desert roads… Several RSF filed commanders, chosen for their knowledge of the border area and desert routes, oversaw the transportation of the weapons in to Darfur and Sudan... These large-scale and sustained supplies ranged from small and light weapons to UCAVs (drones), anti-aircraft missiles, mortars and various types of ammunition.” By engaging in these arms transfers, the UAE violated a UN Security Council arms embargo that was imposed nearly two decades ago, in 2004. The current panel of experts was mandated to monitor compliance with that ban. The five-member team, appointed two weeks before the outbreak of the current civil war, included members from Colombia, France, Russia, Sweden, and Kenya. The UAE’s Permanent Mission to the United Nations issued a letter of reply to the UN Panel, which was included as an annex to the report. The letter does not specifically deny supplying weapons to the RSF, though it affirms the UAE’s “continued commitment to comply with its obligations under the sanctions regime [arms embargo] established by the Security Council.” It also detailed humanitarian shipments that it sent to Amdjarass, including the tonnage of various supplies, and it invited hte Panel of Experts to visit a field hospital it built in the Chadian border town. Open-source researchers who specialize in flight tracking have doubted that so many flights would be needed for just building a field hospital. The UAE admitted to sending 122 flights to Amdjarass. The report also detailed supplies of weapons arriving to Sudan from Libya and the Central African Republic. Previous reporting has indicated that some supplies via Central Africa came from the Wagner mercenary group—though this was not mentioned in the report. Furthermore, the report detailed a fuel supply line established by the RSf through South Sudan. To learn more about Sudan’s civil war, sign up for our free newsletter.Subscribe European Union sanctions Sudanese businessesThe European Union has sanctioned six companies that it says are linked to the warring parties in Sudan. In a press release, the European Council stated, “Among the entities listed are two companies involved in the manufacture of weapons and vehicles for the SAF (Defense Industries System and SMT Engineering); the SAF-controlled Zadna International Company for Investment Limited and three companies involved in procuring military equipment for the RSF (Al Junaid Multi Activities Co Ltd, Tradive General Trading and GSK Advance Company Ltd). The entities listed are subject to asset freezes. The provision of funds or economic resources, directly or indirectly, to them or for their benefit is prohibited.” The United States and United Kingdom had already sanctioned some of these firms. In Brief· A landmine explosion on a bus near Shendi in River Nile State has claimed ten lives, and is believed to be the first deadlye landmine explsion of the war. · An atmosphere of paranoia has gripped Kassala State, amid fears of an “internal attack,” according to a state media report January 20. · A French nonprofit, Promediation, working with the French and Egyptian foreign ministries, has convened a workshop in Cairo with the participation of several different Darfur armed groups, aimeding to reduce tensions in the region. · Bank of Khartoum laid off 1,215 employees, representing 45% of its staff nationally, another step in an ongoing economic collapse. The bank has 125 branches, dozens of which were closed, including some that were looted. · The Sennar State government along with military and security authorities held a mass rally for “popular resistance” in Al-Suki Locality. As reported by the state news agency SUNA, the governor in his remarks praised hte purported role of the “popular resistance “ in repelling an RSF incursion in the Jebel Muya area. The deputy commander of the 17th Infantry Division and the police commander in the state also spoke at the rally, praising and encouraging the arming of civilians. · The Ad-Douiem garrison held a parade for 1,200 trainee soldiers January 21, SUNA reported, overseen by Col Hamad Barshom, commander of the brigade based in Ad-Douiem, and Lt Col Muhammad Suleiman, the reserve commander.Parade for cadets in Ad-Douiem, White Nile State · A fire broke out in the Dharaba mine, which is about 30 kilometers away from the Songo area in South Darfur. Field sources deny that it was bombed by aircraft, despite media reports talking about aerial bombardments that affected the area. · Former Darfur armed movements in El Fasher, which are neutral in the current war, participated in a workshop by Nonviolent Peaceforce yesterday to discuss compliance with international laws on protection of civilians. · 11 people were killed, including seven women and two children, in addition to one wounded, in an airstrike carried out by the Sudanese air force on the village of Ib Khubub west of the city of Mujlad in West Kordofan on Sunday. A local tribal leader, Omda Al-Jak Suleiman, told Radio Dabanga on Monday that an Antonov plane dropped 5 explosive barrels on the village. · RSF troop movements were observed yesterday nearby Mujlad, in the town of Babanusa, West Kordofan, amid escalating threats to attack the 22nd Infantry Division, according to our monitoring of unofficial RSF social media pages. Limited clashes were reported this morning in the city. |
|
|
The UAE extends influence over the Horn – but it also “owns” large parts of Britain
Written by Martin Plaut|
|
Martin Plaut posted: " Source: Daily Telegraph How Lord Cameron rolled out the red carpet for the UAE Plus, we look at how the Gulf state’s network of influence is spreading throughout the UK Investigations team and Gordon Rayner, ASSOCIATE EDITOR23 Jan" Martin Plaut Read on blog or reader |
Source: Daily Telegraph How Lord Cameron rolled out the red carpet for the UAEPlus, we look at how the Gulf state’s network of influence is spreading throughout the UK Gordon Rayner, ASSOCIATE EDITOR23 January 2024 • 11:01pm
Three years after becoming prime minister, Lord Cameron set up a secretive Whitehall unit codenamed Project Falcon. Its job was to court the oil-rich sheikhs of the United Arab Emirates with the aim of persuading them to invest billions in the UK. The unit’s work was so politically sensitive that the Government did not even admit to its existence for two years, and only then after a Freedom of Information battle. Perhaps unsurprisingly, it was to the UAE that the former premier went for part of his portfolio of jobs after he quit No 10 in 2016, earning an estimated £470,000 for making four speeches in the autocratic state, as well as taking a part-time teaching role at a university in Abu Dhabi. Nor is he alone in establishing connections with the Gulf state: almost 100 current and former MPs and peers – including eight ministers – have declared financial links to the UAE in the past decade.
Now Lord Cameron is back in government, newly ennobled and with a brief as Foreign Secretary that gives him responsibility for relations with the UAE – which wants to add The Telegraph to its growing collection of British assets. Lord Cameron has publicly insisted he will play “no role” in the Emirati-backed bid for The Telegraph, but senior Tory sources have disclosed that in private he has told colleagues the UAE should be allowed to own the publisher of this media group. This has become “a source of strain with other ministers”, according to one figure within the party, who believes it gives rise to a potential conflict of interest. This Friday, Lucy Frazer, the Culture Secretary, will receive a report from Ofcom, the media regulator, which has been reviewing the proposed sale of The Telegraph. She must then decide whether to allow the sale to go ahead or to ask the Competition and Markets Authority to carry out a separate review of the bid. She finds herself at the centre of an increasingly political business transaction involving the potential ownership of a major British media asset by a country with a poor record on press freedom.
Lord Cameron on the Dubai Metro in 2012 heading to the World Trade Centre with His Highness Sheikh Ahmed bin Saeed al Maktoum CREDIT: Stefan Rousseau/PA Some are asking what, if any, influence the Foreign Secretary is having over the proposed sale of The Telegraph to a country with which he has such close links. The roots of Lord Cameron’s relationship with the UAE go back to the early years of the coalition government, when austerity measures made it more important than ever to attract foreign investment into the UK. In 2013, Lord Cameron, then prime minister, formed a team of 10 officials led by Treasury minister Lord Deighton. Their job, named Project Falcon, was to encourage the Gulf state to spend its cash in Britain, often by giving wealthy sheikhs privileged access to land deals and prestigious institutions. According to reports, the team of officials produced a “beauty parade” of projects to try to tempt Abu Dhabi’s investment fund at a meeting in July of that year with Sir Tony Blair, who was an adviser for the UAE at the time. But despite the extraordinary levels of access offered, the work of the unit was not made public. Its existence was only revealed two years after its inception following a battle over what the Government had to disclose under Freedom of Information laws. The apparent desire to play down the unit’s activities is now hard to fathom. A decade on, the Government appears to be entirely open about its wish to court the region. Alongside a healthy stream of cash, it is perhaps also motivated by the UAE’s willingness to tackle global issues such as the need for clean energy. In January, a government minister said the UK expected to raise tens of billions of pounds from the state, in addition to a five-year, £10 billion partnership which was sealed in 2021. Most of the funds so far have been spent on life sciences, technology, clean energy and infrastructure. The Gulf state now has large stakes in many of Britain’s critical assets. Its largest sovereign wealth fund, the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, owns nearly a tenth of Thames Water. The Government of Dubai ultimately owns P&O Ferries – which came under the spotlight in 2022 when it abruptly sacked 800 UK employees over a video call – and whose parent company DP World owns two UK ports, London Gateway and Southampton. Abu Dhabi has also set its sights on the UK’s energy sector, saying two years ago that the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (Adnoc) intended to take a 25 per cent stake in BP’s flagship hydrogen project, H2Teeside, whilst Masdar, an Abu Dhabi firm focused on renewable energy, has signed a memorandum of understanding to invest in another proposed BP hydrogen project, HyGreen Teesside.
Lucy Frazer, the Culture Secretary, will have to decide whether to allow the Telegraph sale to go ahead or to ask the Competition and Markets Authority to carry out a separate review CREDIT: Thomas Krych/ZUMA Press Wire/Shutterstock Government ministers are reported to have invited an Emirati investor to help fund the Sizewell C nuclear power plant project – filling a financial hole left after Britain removed Chinese investors because of security fears over the involvement of the Asian superpower in critical national infrastructure. But not everyone is happy about the Gulf state as an alternative owner for some of Britain’s most prized assets.
Some MPs are nervous about any one territory having so much power in Britain, not least a federation of seven absolute monarchies known for their discriminatory treatment of women and intolerant stance on homosexuality. Critics also point to limits on freedom of expression in the UAE. These issues become all the more concerning when it comes to Abu Dhabi’s takeover of British cultural institutions, such as its attempt to take ownership of The Telegraph via RedBird IMI, a joint venture between RedBird, a US private equity firm, and International Media Investments (IMI), Abu Dhabi’s state-backed media investment vehicle, which owns 75 per cent of the partnership. Critics fear that it would hand the new owners undue influence over the UK’s democratic process. The Telegraph titles are currently owned by the Barclay family, which borrowed money from Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, a member of Abu Dhabi’s ruling royal family and owner of Manchester City Football Club, to pay off a debt to Lloyds Banking Group. The Barclays propose to settle the debt by transferring ownership of The Telegraph to RedBird IMI, which is fronted by the US businessman Jeff Zucker. Lord Cameron has privately made it clear that he has no problem with Abu Dhabi owning The Telegraph, putting him at odds with other ministers who do not believe it is appropriate for a major British media company to be, in effect, owned by a foreign state. One senior Tory source said: “Everyone knows that, unfortunately, due to his close connections, the Foreign Secretary is minded to let the bid proceed. That gives rise to a potential conflict of interest. “This is a source of strain with other ministers.”
Lord Cameron with His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum at Zabeel Palace in Dubai in 2013 CREDIT: Stefan Rousseau/PA Wire The source added: “David Cameron’s global network of personal interests is showing through yet again – in private he is accusing those of us who want to see The Telegraph remain British of being nationalists. “In reality, we just don’t want to sell it to a foreign power who will exert state control over the British media. “He has no long-term interest other than what suits him to trade off when we lose.” Lord Cameron might, of course, argue he is simply doing what any foreign secretary would do: trying to maintain good working relationships with trading partners in the face of Government decisions that might be unpopular with them. In November, it emerged that the Foreign Office had intervened to “soften” the language used by the Culture Secretary in a letter to RedBird IMI about the Telegraph deal for fear of offending its backers in Abu Dhabi. While his ministers look both ways, “Rishi Sunak will just push [the Telegraph decision] into the long grass to avoid judgement day”, the Tory source said. Lord Cameron is not a lone voice in the matter. George Osborne, his closest political ally from his time as prime minister, is one of four partners of the investment bank Robey Warshaw, which has been hired by RedBird IMI to advise on the bid.
Lord Cameron’s sister-in-law, the former editor of the Evening Standard, Emily Sheffield, publicly criticised Mr Osborne for “aiding a state to buy one of our media institutions”. The peer has expanded his power base since returning to government by taking on influential figures from his Downing Street years. Baroness Sugg, his former head of operations, and Laurence Mann, his former political private secretary, are both employed as special advisers to the Foreign Secretary. Meanwhile, Adam Atashzai, his former deputy political director, is now one of Mr Sunak’s senior advisers, while Laura Trott, who was one of Lord Cameron’s special advisers, is now in the Cabinet as Chief Secretary to the Treasury. Ms Sheffield, meanwhile, has just started a new job at Conservative Campaign Headquarters advising on communications.
Former prime minister Tony Blair was [art of Project Falcon and an adviser for the UAE at the time CREDIT: Peter Macdiarmid/Getty Images When Lord Cameron was asked in December about the proposed UAE takeover, he told The Telegraph: “I’m not getting into that at all. It’s a quasi-judicial matter for the DCMS Secretary. I will play no role in that at all.” The reason he was asked the question in the first place is because of the time he spent in the UAE after he left office, where he earned substantial sums of money. He has given four speeches in the UAE, including one last year, which also involved hosting a private lunch. Well-placed sources told The Telegraph the peer received at least £117,500 for each speech, as well as first-class travel and accommodation in five-star hotels. Last year, he also undertook a three-week stint as a lecturer at NYU Abu Dhabi, a branch of New York University, for which he is likely to have earned further substantial fees. It has also emerged he attended two conferences in the Gulf state to raise funds for a south east Asian project. Although his work on the speakers’ circuit, along with his role at the university, was deemed “relevant” by the parliamentary ethics adviser and therefore published in the List of Ministers’ Interests, no detail as to the amounts paid was provided, provoking questions about transparency. The Foreign Office has previously refused to disclose which jobs and clients the peer had given up to take the role. A spokesman for Lord Cameron told The Telegraph: “The Foreign Secretary has declared his previous interests to the Permanent Secretary in the correct way. “The proposed takeover is a quasi-judicial decision for the Secretary of State for DCMS. The Foreign Secretary does not have a role – formal or informal – in the decision.”
Levelling Up Secretary Michael Gove is also a beneficiary of UAE hospitality CREDIT: Chris J. Ratcliffe/Bloomberg In addition to Lord Cameron, 98 current and former MPs and peers have accepted more than £1.5 million in earnings, donations and hospitality from the UAE in the past decade, including figures who remain at the heart of Government. The overall figure will be even higher because 33 members were not required to declare the value of one or more of their Emirates-linked financial interests. Michael Gove and Andrew Mitchell, who both served in Lord Cameron’s cabinet, are among the beneficiaries of UAE hospitality. Other serving ministers to have benefited from the state’s riches are justice minister Edward Argar, health minister Helen Whately, foreign minister Leo Docherty, defence minister James Heappey and minister for business and trade Nusrat Ghani. None of the ministers responded to questions from The Telegraph about their links to the UAE. Whether such links would have been forged without Lord Cameron rolling out the red carpet for the Gulf state cannot be known. But with the deadline for a decision on the ownership of The Telegraph looming, questions about the extent to which the Foreign Secretary is still championing the UAE’s interests will not go away. The UAE’s network of investments and influence in BritainThe United Arab Emirates has established an extensive portfolio of investments and a network of relationships in Britain, stretching from cultural institutions to royalty and sport. These links raise questions over the level of influence that the Gulf state already has in the UK, especially given the concerns over its human rights record. EducationThe UAE has extensive links with some of Britain’s most prestigious education institutions. Gordonstoun, where the King was a pupil, announced in October that it would build an outpost on Abu Dhabi’s Jubail Island. In doing so, it joined a string of British schools and universities that have set up satellite campuses in the oil-rich nation. Imperial College London has opened three diabetes treatment and research centres in the UAE, backed by one of Abu Dhabi’s sovereign wealth funds, and in 2021 it emerged that the Gulf state was attempting to engineer a partnership with the University of Cambridge.
Leaked documents, drawn up by University of Cambridge officials and addressed to its general board, show that the university was in talks about a £400 million partnership with the UAE, which would have included setting up a jointly-branded institute with a bricks-and-mortar presence in the Emirates. The document, seen by The Telegraph, asked the general board to approve the agreement in principle, but also raised “broad concerns about human rights in the UAE” and noted that there was a “values gap” between Cambridge and the UAE which presented a “risk” to Cambridge’s reputation. “We are fully aware of the UAE’s recent treatment of UK researchers and other visitors, which reflect a dramatically different cultural and legal context than that which may be familiar to our staff and students,” it said. In 2018, Matthew Hedges, a PhD student at Durham University, was arrested at Dubai airport on suspicion of working for MI6, and held in solitary confinement for almost six months. Three years later, British football coach Billy Hood was jailed in Dubai after four bottles of vape liquid containing cannabis oil were found in his car. He was originally sentenced to 25 years, a term that was later reduced to 10 years. In the Cambridge document, it is also indicated the UK Government was supportive of the partnership. It stated: “The UK Government is aware that we are developing a proposal of our own [to partner with the UAE] and we understand they will support it.” In the end, the Cambridge deal fell apart following pressure from human rights campaigners – and after an unrelated scandal erupted over claims that the UAE had used controversial Pegasus hacking software to covertly harvest data from the phones of people outside its borders, including a member of the House of Lords. Nonetheless, the claims in the leaked document are likely to stoke fears that the Government is too willing to overlook human rights concerns in order to promote financial partnerships with the Gulf state.
Premier League winning team Manchester City is perhaps one of the Gulf state’s best-known assets in the UK CREDIT: Michael Regan/Getty Images Manchester CityThe football club is one of the Gulf state’s best-known assets in the UK. It was bought in 2008 by the Abu Dhabi United Group, headed up by Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan. Mansour is the brother of the ruler of Abu Dhabi. Since the purchase, Manchester City have consistently outplayed every other club in the Premiership, winning the league title seven times. They have taken the title five times in the last six years, and are the bookmakers’ favourite to do so again this year. Dwarfing the reported £200 million the Abu Dhabi United Group paid for the club are the vast sums spent each year on buying the best players and coaching staff. In 2019, Uefa started looking into alleged violations of financial regulations by the club, including questions over whether sponsorship fees were properly declared. The club always denied any wrongdoing but was initially banned for two seasons and issued with a £26.8 million fine. After appealing to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, the ban was overturned and the fine was reduced to £8.9 million. Owning Manchester City has also handed the UAE a very useful calling card when it came to currying favour with politicians. In 2019, it gave Michael Gove £1,440 of tickets and hospitality from Manchester City – believed to be for a match against Chelsea. Mr Gove is a fan of Queens Park Rangers. Now Housing Secretary, Mr Gove has long been a key figure in the Cabinet and was Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster at the time. Cultural institutionsThe UAE has ties with some of the most prestigious institutions in Britain’s cultural landscape. In 2009, the British Museum struck a deal to loan objects to Abu Dhabi’s yet-to-be-completed Zayed Museum and to help it curate exhibitions in return for fees paid by the UAE. In 2018, the British Museum renewed the deal, at the same time as it renamed one of its galleries the “Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan Gallery for Europe and the Middle East”. Sheikh Zayed was the founder and former president of the UAE who died in 2004. Britain’s eminent orchestras also perform in Abu Dhabi.
The Royal Philharmonic Concert Orchestra has played at Abu Dhabi’s national day and in 2022, the London Symphony Orchestra premiered a symphony which celebrated the culture and values of the UAE. The Gulf state has also managed to woo a highly-paid BBC presenter: Stephen Sackur, who fronts HardTalk on BBC World News and is one of the corporation’s best-known faces outside Britain. He regularly fronts hotel conferences in the UAE and was paid up to £10,000 as a host at the Future Hospitality Summit in Abu Dhabi last September, where he interviewed Abdulla bin Touq, the UAE’s Minister of Economy. While the BBC said that it publishes “the externally paid for work of its on-air journalists for transparency” and that “every event is approved in line with our editorial guidelines”, there are nevertheless questions about whether the appearance may have compromised the broadcaster’s impartiality. The Duke of YorkThe Duke of York has a close relationship with the UAE, and concerns were raised over a potential conflict of interest after reports emerged about the hospitality he accepted from the state while he was the UK’s trade envoy – a position he held for a decade until 2011. In 2010, it emerged that the UAE royal family had given the Duke the use of a “gilded mini-palace” in their compound for use when he visited – whether on private or official business. The Duke also visited the now-former Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi’s house in Morocco, where the pair went hunting, while he was trade envoy. The Duke, and Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed, often referred to as MBZ, are longstanding friends having met as boys at Gordonstoun boarding school in Scotland when the Sheikh spent a summer there. A friend close to the Prince denied that there was a conflict and said it “sounds like part of his old job promoting UK interests around the world, which he did very effectively”. Prince Andrew was – and remains - a regular visitor to Abu Dhabi, clocking up 18 visits since 2001, according to palace records. Land dealsIn Manchester, an Abu Dhabi firm has been allowed to buy a 999-year leasehold for brownfield sites that were previously publicly owned, to build thousands of residential properties in the east of the city. Most of these homes are rented out via a joint venture between the council and the Abu Dhabi firm, but the council reportedly only receives a small fraction of the rental income. Manchester City Council has robustly defended the 2014 transaction, saying it used “nationally accepted” valuation methods, that it “got the best overall deal we could… at a time when there was very little market interest”, and that it has received £3 million from the joint venture “with more to come”. However, researchers at the University of Sheffield’s Urban Institute – which examines how cities are responding to intensified urbanisation – have said that the deal undervalued the properties and that the council “sold the family silver too cheap”. Additional reporting by Ruth Hallows |
