ነዛሕቲ መርዚ ሓሶትን ሰማዕትን ኣብ ”እኩይ ውህደት” ዘርኢ ክርዳድ: ፓይሎት: ፎሮ 12 ካልኦትን። መብቆልኩም ሓደዩ። ዕላማኹም ንምዝራግ ውሁድ ፖለቲካዊ መስርሕዩ። ንህግደፍ ክቐትል: ክሙቁሕ: ክጨዊ: ንምቕጻል ዘምበድብድ መሽረፈት ኢኹም። ብተገብርዎ ነውሪ ፖለቲካ ምድንጋር ልብኹም ዘሕበጥኩም። ዘርኢ ክርዳድ ክትጅምር ከሎኻ ቅብኢ ሓሶት ተቐኒትካ ህርፋንን ስስዐን ገንዘብ ዓይንኻን ኣእምሮኻን ሸፊኑ: ኣሕዋትን ጎደቦታት ዓድታትን ከናቚት ብዝኽእል ንፋስ ኣንበድቢድካ። ሓው ግረነት ከም ዝበሎ ኣበይ: መዓስ: መን ንመን ቀቲሉ ስለምንታይ᎒ ብኸመይ ዝብል ሰሚዑ ዝሓትት ስለዘይረኽብካ: መጽሓፍ ክርዳድ ኣዳሊኻ። ኣብ ዕዳጋ ከተውርዳ ከለኻ ግን ኣብ ጽሑፍ ንእተስፍሮ ሰነድ ኮይኑ ጸልማት ምስ ወግሐ ብደም ከይትሕተት ካብ ቃልካ ዝወጸ ኣብ ጽሑፍካ መዝሕቕካ። ንግድኻ ግን ሰሊጡካ። ኣብ ምሻጥ መጽሓፍካ እኩይ ውህደት ሓሶትን ሰማዕትን ተዋሃሂዱ ኣብ ዕዳጋ ክወርድ ርኢና። እቲ ሰይጣናዊ ውሕጅ ሓሶትካ ሓመድን እምንን ገረብን ጨናፍርን እናገምጠለን መንቆሰን መልዓሰን ይጎርፍ ስለ ዝነበረ ንህግደፍ ቀውዒ ንራኢ ደሞክራስን ፍትሕን ድማ ዓይነን ዝደፍን ዶርናዩ ነይሩ። እዚዩ ሰንሰለት ምትእስሳርካ ምስ ጸረ ህዝቢ ህግደፍ፣ ክርዳድ። ፓይሎት! ብዝብል ሕቡእ ስም ኣብ ግዜ ሰውራን ድሕሪ ነጻነትን ዝነበረ ክፉእ ተግባራት ህግደፋውያን ክገለጽ ኣብ ተቐልቀለሉ ዝፈልጦን ዝስምዖን ዝመሃዞን ኣቃሚሙ መዲሩ። መንነትካ ሓቢእካ ኣብ ድሕሪ ኮምፒተር ተጠዊቕካ ”መንእሰይ ኣይትዳህለል” ፡ብዝብል ሕቡእ ኣጀንዳኻን ለኣኽትኻን ሰፊኑ ክሰርሕ ኣብ ውሽጥን ወጻእን ዘለው ሃገራውያን ኤርትራውያን ኣስማቶም እናጠቐስካ: ንተቓለስትን ውዱብ ቃልስን ንምዝራግ ተዓጢቕካ ደቢልካ። ሕማቕ ኣጋጣሚ ኮይኑ ሕልምኻን ክፉእ ሽታ ትንፋስካን ንቡዙሓት ኣእምኑስ ውዱባት ኣብ ምርጋም ዝተዋደደን ዝመረሸን ቃልሲ ሕንቅልቅሊተይ ኣጎሃሂርካ። ካብ ጥሓኒት መኪና ህግደፋውያን ኤርትራውያን ኣምሊጦም ርእይቶኦምን ውድባዊ ቃልሶምን ብነጻን ቅልዑን ንዝገብርዎ ቃልሲ ንምጉንዳብ ኣብ ሕቡእ ኮንካ ኣይትስምዕዎም ”ህግደፍዮም” ብምባል ውሕ! ኢልካ። ልኡኽ ህግደፍ ኣይኮንኩን ኢልክ ከም ”ትምጉት” ንፈልጥ ኢና። ንሰማዕትኻ። ኣብ መደረኻ ጸላእ ኩሉ ዝፈለጦን ዝፈንፎኖን መራሕ ህግደፍ መሲልካ ኢኻ ትዝምር። ስሙ ንምድህላል ከምትጥቀመሉን ጸላኢኡ መሲላካ ነቢሕካ ኢኻ። መደረኻን ትሕዝቶ ዘመተኻን ግን ንኣገልግሎት ህግደፍዩ ዊዒሉ። ብቐደሙውን ንስውር ለኣኺኻ ሃዋርያ ዝርጋን ኮንካ ኢኻ ተበጊስካ። ገለ መንእሰያትን ኣርሒቖም ዘይርእዩ ዓበይትን ንዘበጥቕ ሓሳብካ ሰምዖም ከም ተዓዘሙን ንመዝሙር ዝርጋንካ ከም ዝደገሙን ዝሕባእ ኣይኮነን። መንእሰያት ኣብ ዘለዋ ደሞክራስያውያን ሓይልታት ንኽይውደቡን ሓቢሩ ብግብሪ ከይሰርሕን ምንብድባድ ደኣሞ ደይ ረብሓ ህግደፍዩ። ንግሩህ ኣእምሮ ብሕልክስና ሚሂርካ ከምዘጓናበድካ ኣሚናልካ ኣለና። ንግዜ ሓርነትና ከምዝመጠጥካውን ኣይሰሓትናን። ፎሮ 12! ብመደብ ዝሰርሕ ኣጀንዳ ህግደፍ ኢኻ እትውክል። ክትጅምር ከለኻ ትሕት ኢልካ ኢኻ ተጸፊኻ። ጽንሕ ኢልካ ኣብ ክልተ ዓመት ኣብ መስርዕ ሰለያ ከምዝኣቶኻን እሙን ኮንካ ከምተቖጸርካን ኢኻ ኣዘንቲኻ። ብብቕሩብ ከኣ ናይ ሰማዕትኻ ፍጹም ምቁጽጻር ከም ዘረኽብካ ምስ ኣርጋጋጽካ ፈላጥ ምሉእ መስርሕ ሓለዋ ስውራየ: ንኽሉ ኣብ ግዜ ሰውራ ዝነበረን ድሕሪ ነጻነት ዝሰዓበን ስንክሳር መጽሓፍካን መኸርትኻን ተተርኢስካ ቀታልን ተቐታልን ጨቋንን ኣንጻር ጭቆናን ደዋሲስካ ኣብ ሓደ በኹራ ኣእትኻ ብምምሃር: ነቲ ክርዳድን ፓይሎትን ዝኸድዎ መገዲ ብምኹላዕ: ”ብፍልጠት ስለያኻ” ኣሰኒኻ: ንኣብ መገዲ ስምምዕ ዘለው ደለይቲ ሓርነት ተረቂቕካ ብምእታው ንሓድሓድ ምጥርጣርን ውደቦኦም ኣንጻር ምልኪ ንኸየሕይሉን ምጉስጓስካ ንረብሓ ጸላኢምበር ካልእ ፍይዳ የብልካን ፎሮ። መደረኻ ናይ ዓያሹ ኣይኮነን። ሕቡእ መንነትካ ንበጺሕናዮ ዘለና መድረኽ ፍትሓዊ ቃልስና ዘታልልዩ። ንመኣዝን ቅኑዕ መድረኽ ውደባና ክቖጺ ዝጓዝም ዘሎ መሓዛ ፖለቲካዊ መስርሕን መፈንጠራን ህግደፍዩ ጉዕዞኻ ፎሮ 12። ”ፍልጠትካ መስርሕ ስለያ” ንመስርሕ ሓድነትና ብዝጻባእ ፖለቲካ ኢኻ ተሳውሮ ዘለኻ። ኣተሃድና ቆቛሕ ዘይፈልጥስ ኣይሃዳናይንዩ።
ንባራበር።
31 ጥቅምቲ 2016
ርእሰ-ዓንቀጽ ሰዲህኤ
እዚ ንርከበሉ ዘለና ዘመን መራኸቢ መንገድታት ኣብ ዝለዓለ ደረጃ ዕቤት ዝበጽሕሉ እዩ። ሰባት ብውልቆም ኮነ ብውዱብ ኣገባብ ብዛዕባ ሓደ ጉዳይ ቅኑዕ ኮይኑ ዝረኣዮም ሓሳብ ናይ ምዝርጋሕ ሰፊሕ ዕድልን ኣገባባትን ኣለዎም። ሰልፍታትን ውድባትን ቅኑዕ ኢሎም ዝኣምንሉን ንምትግባሩ ዝቃለስሉን ኣተሓሳስባ ናብ ዝምልከቶ ኣካል ንምብጻሕ ብዙሕ መማረጺ ዕድላት ኣለዎም። ኢመይል፡ መርበብ ሓበሬታ፡ ስካይፕ፡ ቫይበር፡ ዩቱብ፡ ትዊተር፡ ፌስቡክ፡ …. ውዘተ ካብቶም ዘመናውያን መዘርግሒ ሓበሬታ እዮም። እዚ ብኣካል ከይተራኸብካ’ውን ሓሳብ ንሓሳብ ናይ ምውህሃብን ምድምማጽን ዕድል ሰፊሑ ምህላዉ ዘመልክት እዩ። ድሕሪ’ዚ እቲ ዝያዳ ክንጭነቐሉ ዝግበኣና ናይ ኣዘረጋግሓ ኣገባብ ዘይኮነስ ናይቲ ዝዝርጋሕ ኣተሓሳስባ ትሕዝቶን ቁምነገርን እዩ። ናይቲ ዝዝርግሕን ናይቲ ነቲ ዝዝርጋሕ ዝቕበልን ኣካላት ግቡእ ምንባብን ምድምማጽን ከኣ ካልእ ኣገዳሲ እዩ። ምድምማጽ ክንብል እንከለና እቲ ሓደ ዝበሎ እቲ ተቐባሊ ግድን ክኣምነሉ ኣለዎ ማለትና ዘይኮነ፡ ናይ ግድን ክርደኦ ክኽእል ኣለዎ ማለትና እዩ።
ነዚ ዘመናዊ ናይ መራኸቢ ጸጋ ብምጥቃም፡ ዳርጋ መብዛሕትአን ተቓወምቲ ሰልፍታትን ውድባትን ኤርትራ ኣብ ጉባአታተን ዘጽደቐኦ ንናይ ኣተሓሳስባ እምነተን ዝውክል ፖለቲካዊ መደብ ዕዮ ኮነ ንኣተገባብረኡ ዘነጽር ፖሊሲታተን ይዝርገሓ እየን። ናይ’ዚ ኣገባብ ሓደ ጠቕሚ ባህሊ ንጹርነት ምስራጽ እዩ። ኣብ ሓያሎ ዛዕባታት ንጹርነት ዘየበለን ክንሰን “ተቓወምቲ ውድባት ኢና” ዝብላ ኣካላት ከም ዘለዋ’’ውን ክስገር ዘይግበኦ ሓቂ እዩ። እቲ ኣብዚ ክጥቀስ ዝግበኦ ቁምነገር እምበኣር፡ “ሰልፍታት ወይ ውድባት ኣብ ደንበ ተቓውሞ ኤርትራ ኣብ ነንሕድሕደን ይደማመጻዶ ኣለዋ? ዝብል ሕቶ እዩ። ሓንቲ ሰልፊ ወይ ውድብ ኣብ መትከላት ናይታ መወዳድርታ “ቅኑዕ ወይ ግጉይ” ክትብል ውሁብ እዩ። ንሳ ከምኡ ክትበሃል’ውን ከምኡ ውሁብ’ዩ። ካብዚ መደምደምታታት ኣብ ሓዲኡ ማለት ምድጋፍ ወይ ምቅዋም ክትረግጽ እንከላ ግና ጥንቃቐን ንጹርነትን ዝሓታ እዩ። ንሓደ ፖለቲካዊ ኣካል፡ ሰልፊ ይኹን ውድብ ወይ ማሕበር፡ ብፖለቲካዊ ዓይኒ “ከምዚ እዩ ኣደቡ” ኢልካ ክትድምድም ቀሊል ሓላፍነት ኣይኮነን። ምእንቲ እዚ መደምደምታኻ ብጭብጢ ዝተሰነየ ክኸውን ናይ ግድን እዩ። ምኽንያቱ መጻኢ ዝምድናኻ ኣብዚ ዝምስረት ስለ ዝኾነ። ከምዚ እንተዘይኮይኑ ግና ውጽኢቱ ተጋጊኻ ምግጋይ እዩ ዝኸውን።
ኣብዚ ዘለናዮ እዋን መብዛሕትአን ኤርትራውያን ናይ ተቓውሞ ሰልፍታት ኮና ውድባት፡ ኣብ ኣወጋግዳ እቲ ሕድሪ ህዝብና ጠሊሙ፡ ንናቱ ጉጅላዊ ዊንታ ዝነብር ዘሎ ህግደፍን፡ ድሕሪ ውድቀቱ ብዛዕባ ኣብ ኤርትራ ክትከል ዝግበኦ ስርዓተ-ምምሕዳርን ዘዝኣምናሉ ብደረጃ ፖለቲካዊ መደብ ዕዮን ፖሊሲን ይገልጻ እየን። ህዝቢ ኤርትራ ኣብዚ ግዜ’ዚ፡ ከምኡ ንምግባር ከምዘይጥዕሞ’ኳ ንኹላትና ብሩህ እንተኾነ፡ ንመጻኢ’ውን ኣብ ሰነዳተን ተመስሪቱ እዩ ዝድገፍ ክድግፍ ወይ ንዝቃወም ክቃወም። እተን ውድባት ድማ፡ ኣብ መትከላት መወዳድርተን ሰልፊ ድዩ ውድብ ናይ ምድጋፍ ይኹን ናይ ምቅዋም መርገጽ ንክወስዳ ነቲ ውድብ ኣብ ሰነዳቱ ኣትኪለን ብግቡእ ክፈልጠኦ ግድን እዩ። በዚ መስርሕ ከይሓለፍካ ንሓደ ፖለቲካዊ ትካል ምድጋፍን ምንጻግን፡ ስምዒታዊ ወይ ኣብቲ ሰልፍታት ወይ ውድባት ናይ ዘለዉ ሰባት ባህሪ ዘትከለ ክኸውን ስለ ዝኽእል ውጽኢቱ ሃናጺ ኣይኮነን።
እዛ ንነብረላ ዘላ ዓለም ከምቲ ኣቐዲሙ ዝተገልጸ፡ ናይ እንካን ሃባን ካብ እትኸውን ነዊሕ ግዜ ኮይኑ እዩ። እንተኾነ ብዙሓት ወገናት ጌና ክንድቲ ዝዛረብዎ ክሰምዑ ቅሩባት ዝኾኑ ኣይመስሉን። ኣብዚ መስርሕ “እቲ ሓቂ እቲ ኣነ ዝብሎ ጥራይ እዩ” ዝብል ስምዒት ጐዳኢ እዩ። ወለድና “ኣብ ክንዲ ንፉዕ ተዛራቢ ንፉዕ ሰማዒ ኩን” ዝብልዎ ምዕዶ ኣብ ከምዚ ኩነታት ኣገዳሲ እዩ። ገለ ወገናት ኣብ ጉዳይ ሃገር ይኹን ውልቂ ኣተሓሳስባኦም ክሰምዓሎም ይህንጠዩ። ናይ ካለኦት ሓሳብ ናይ ምስማዕን ካብኡ እቲ ቅኑዕ እትብሎ ወሲድካ ናትካ ናይ ምግባሩን ቅሩብነቶም ግና ከምቲ ዝድለ ኣይከውንን። ኣቲ ክሰምዖም ጥራይ ዝደልይዎ ወገን እውን ክስማዕ ከም ዝደሊ ከኣ ኣየስተብህሉን። ብዛዕባ ሓደ ጉዳይ ከየረጋገጽካ ዘይርጡብ ሓበሬታ ብምውሳድ ነቲ ዋንኡ ግጉይ መልክዕ ምሃቡ ቅቡል ኣይኮነን። እቲ ዝገደደ ከኣ ነቲ ዝተሰነደ ትሕዝቶኡ ባህ ስለ ዘይበለካ፡ ውናኡ ብኾፉ፡ ቀይናን ትርጉም ክትህብ ምፍታን እዩ። ናይ ከምዚ ኣሉታዊ ሳዕቤን ከኣ ቀንዲ ኣብቲ በሃሊኡ ዝዓርፍን ምትትእምማን ዘጥፍእን እዩ። ስለዚ ንሓደ ሰልፊ፡ ውድብ ወይ ማሕበር “ከምዚ እዩ ፖለቲካዊ ኣደቡ” ምባል ፍርዲ ምሃብ እዩ። እዚ ፍርዲ’ዚ ኣብ ጥጡሕ ባይታ ዘይተሰረተ እንተ ኮይኑ ከኣ ኣሉታዊ ግብረ-መልሱ ሕጂ’ውን እንተላይ ናብቲ በሃሊኡ እዩ።
ብጽሞና ከም እንከታተሎ፡ ተቓወምቲ ሰልፍታትን ውድባትን ኤርትራ፡ ክሳብ ሕጂ ከም ባህሊ ዝሰርሓሉ ዘለዋ፡ ኣብ ክንዲ ነቲ ንኡስ መሰማምዒ ኣተሓሳስባ ከም ዝዓቢ ምግባር፡ ነቲ ዝፈላሊ መሊስካ ኣብ ምግፋሑ ዘድሃበ ምዃኑ እዩ። ናይ’ዚ መንቀሊ ከኣ ንጉዳያት ከምቲ ዘለዉዎ ዘቕርብ ብጥርጠራን ስግኣትን ዘይተሻበበ፡ ርትዓውነትን ፍትሓውነትን ዘይምውናን እዩ። ካብዚ ዝንቡዕን ቃለ-ዓለማውን ኣተሓሳስባ ንምውጻእ እምበኣር፡ ዝኾነት ሰልፊ፡ ውድብን ማሕበርን፡ ብውልቂ’ውን እንተኾነ፡ ኣብ ልዕሊ ሓደ ናይ ተቓውሞ ሓይሊ “ከምዚ እዩ ትሕዝቶኡ” ኢሉ ክድምድም ብዛዕባ ናይቶም ዝነቕፎም ኮነ ዝንእዶም ውዳበታት ንጹር፡ ምኽንያታውን እዋናውን ግንዛበ ክህልዎ ናይ ግድን እዩ። ኣብዚ ኣዋንዚ ብዛዕባ ዝተፈላለዩ ጉዳያት፡ ኣብ ዝተፈላልዩ ናይ ውድባት መርበባትን ተመሳሰልቲ ኤለክትሮኒካዊ መድረኻትን ዝዝርግሑ ሓሳባት ኣለዉ። ነዚኣቶም ክሳብ ክንደይ ኢና ዳህሲስና ግቡእ ትሕዝቶታቶም ንርዳእ’ሞ ርትዓዊ ሚዛን እንህቦም ክንሓስበሉ ዝገባእ እዩ። ከነጥርዮ ዝግበኣና ምድምማጽ ከኣ ንሱ’ዩ። ምኽንያቱ ደጋፊ ይኹን ተቓዋሚ መርገጽና ካብዚ ክነቅል ስል ዝግበኦ።
Campaigners release song for Eritrean journalist Dawit Isaak marking his 15th year in prison
Written by KIRSTEEN PATERSON
IT IS a birthday present he may never hear, but it reminds the world he is alive – campaigners have released a song to mark 15 years in captivity as Eritrean journalist Dawit Isaak turns 52 in jail.
Arrested for reporting on a series of letters calling for advances in democracy in the African nation, Isaak has been held without trial or contact with loved ones or legal representation since he was 36.
His first birthday under incarceration came shortly after and on Thursday his latest celebration was marked by friends and family campaigning for his release. This includes brother Esayas Isaak, who lives in the family’s adopted home of Sweden, where Dawit holds joint citizenship.
Now the Sweden-based Free Dawit campaign has released an English-language song to remind the world of his plight.
Meanwhile, The National, which has agreed to take up Dawit’s case, is inviting readers to add their voices to calls for his release.
Campaigners from the Glasgow group of human rights charity Amnesty International have repeated petitioned leaders in capital city Asmara, also asking for news of Dawit’s location and condition.
Letters can be sent to President Isais Afewerki, Justice Minister Fawzia Hashim and Estifanos Habtemariam Ghebreyesus, the country’s ambassador to the UK. Emails can also be sent to the Eritrean embassy in London.
Activist Alex Jackson, who spent many years in the country and was himself detained by officials before returning to Scotland, said: “If we do nothing then we are allowing bad things to go on with impunity, with no comment.
“We know the effect letters can have. Worldwide, we have examples where the decision makers say ‘there is a large body of opinion out there that we have got to listen to’. You never know which drop will cause the dam to burst.
“There is evidence that the dam is cracking. There are signs of the Eritrean government being willing to negotiate, debate and discuss.
“They are talking to the European Union, they are talking to the United Nations. Recently they allowed the UN to inspect a prison. It was a small step but a significant one. Eritreans are the single largest group of refugees coming into the UK. That fact alone makes what happens in Eritrea significant for people here.
He added: “Even if there is no sign that the door is moving, you should keep pushing it. Maybe it will open.”
Meanwhile, the newly-released song, titled Bird Song, urges Dawit to “hold on” from his cell, where is understood to be in solitary confinement, asking: “Can you see the moonlight? Tell me, are there even windows? Do you hear bird noise?.
Recorded under the name Together For Dawit, the piece follows a Swedish-language version and features vocals by musicians from Senegal, Mali, Sweden and America and is available on YouTube, iTunes and Spotify.
Campaigners said it is “about love, being deeply missed, freedom and to speak up for those who been silenced”.
Responding, Naomi McAuliffe, Amnesty International’s Scotland Programme Director, said: “We appreciate The National highlighting the campaign to free disappeared Eritrean journalist Dawit Isaak on the weekend of his birthday.
“He has been unfairly imprisoned since September 2001 after being arrested with nine other independent journalists – some of whom have died behind bars.
“Dawit Isaak has endured hunger strikes and grave illness during his time in prison but the Eritrean government refuses to confirm any details of his case.
“Amnesty Local Group activists in Scotland are campaigning for his release as well as for other journalists who have been persecuted for reporting human rights abuses. We hope National readers will join them and help us free prisoners of conscience.”
New York Demo Oct. 27, 2016 - Interviews
New York Demo Oct. 27, 2016 - Interviews
New York Demonstration October 27, 2016
Prisoners of conscience remembered on International Religious Freedom Day
Written by Matt Hadro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
.- Leading religious freedom advocates called for the release of all “prisoners of conscience” worldwide on International Religious Freedom Day.
“For the sake of these and other prisoners of conscience we dare not be silent,” wrote Fr. Thomas Reese and Daniel Mark, chairman and vice chairman of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, in an op-ed for the Philadelphia Inquirer.
“We call for their immediate release, and we ask free people everywhere to urge Pakistan, Iran, and Eritrea to release every religious prisoner of conscience they hold,” they stated.
Oct. 27 is International Religious Freedom Day. The day marks the 18th anniversary of the 1998 International Religious Freedom Act, a bill that helped solidify the role of religious freedom in U.S. foreign policy and diplomacy.
The law created an office within the State Department for international religious freedom. Additionally, it created the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom as “an independent, bipartisan federal body to monitor religious freedom abuses abroad and provide policy recommendations to the president, secretary of state, and Congress.”
“The rights to exercise one’s freedom of thought, conscience, and religion are fundamental human rights and bedrock American principles,” John Kirby, Assistant Secretary of State, said on Thursday. “We believe everyone deserves these freedoms.”
However, “nearly two decades later, standing for religious freedom worldwide is as important as ever,” Fr. Reese and Mark insisted, noting that billions of people worldwide “live under governments that perpetrate or tolerate serious abuses against freedom of religion or belief.”
The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) defines a “prisoner of conscience” as someone “whom governments hold for reasons including those related to religion.”
Common instances of this type of imprisonment include governments jailing dissident clerics and members of non-state sanctioned faiths, and convictions on “blasphemy laws,” which in some cases don’t carry a punishment for false accusations, and which are often used to persecute religious minorities.
USCIRF’s 2016 annual report noted that “the incarceration of prisoners of conscience” still “remains astonishingly widespread, occurring in country after country” like China, Eritrea, Iran, North Korea, and Pakistan.
For instance, 80 year-old Abdul Shakoor, an Ahmadi Muslim living in Pakistan, was “falsely accused of selling to an undercover police officer an Ahmadiyya commentary on the Qur'an and other publications,” which is against the law in the country, Fr. Reese and Mark noted, adding that Shakoor received “concurrent sentences of five years and three years in prison” in January.
There is also the case of the “Baha’i Seven,” members of the Baha’i minority religious sect in Iran. Two of them were arrested in 2008 and “given 20-year sentences on false charges of espionage, propaganda against the ‘Islamic Republic,’ and establishment of an illegal administration.”
“The plight of these prisoners highlights the abysmal status of religious freedom in the countries that persecute them,” the op-ed insisted.
The U.S. can also do more for these prisoners, Fr. Reese and Mark insisted.
For instance, the State Department could “compile a comprehensive list of religious prisoners which would better enable State to advocate” for their liberation.
They added that the State Department should “follow USCIRF's long-standing recommendation to designate Pakistan a country of particular concern (CPC), marking it as one of the world's worst abusers of religious freedom.”
The CPC list identifies countries where the worst persecutions of religious freedom take place, either at the hands of the state or by non-state actors in states that do not stop the abuses.
The list is used to pressure these countries to improve their human rights records. Currently, the State Department lists Burma, China, Eritrea, North Korea, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Iran, Sudan, and Saudi Arabia as CPCs.
USCIRF has recommended more countries be added to the list: Central African Republic, Egypt, Iraq, Syria, Nigeria, Pakistan, and Vietnam.
“As we mark International Religious Freedom Day, let us stand for the freedom of all people to practice their religion alone and in groups, in public and in private, and let the United States and the international community hold governments accountable for the protection of this inalienable human right,” Fr. Reese and Mark concluded.
መጀመርያ መን እዩ ስለፊ ዲሞክራሲ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ ዘይፈልጥ እኳ ኣሎ እንተዘይተባህለ ገለ ውሑዳት ግን ብርግጽ ዘይፈልጥዎ ክህልዉ ይኽእሉ። ሰልፊ ዲሞክራሲ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ ነቲ ቅኑዕ ቅኑዕ፥ ነቲ ጌጋ ከኣ ጌጋ እናበለ፥ ካብቲ ብጉባኤታቱ ኣቢሉ ዝጸደቐ መተከላቱ ንየማን ይኹን ንጸገም ከየላገሰ ንጹር ዕላማኡ ተኸቲሉ ዘሰላስል ሰልፊ እዩ።
እቲ ኣዝዩ ዘገርም ግና እቲ ኣብ ልዕሊ እዚ ሰልፊ ዝወርድ ዝነበረ ጸለመን ምክፋእን ክሳብ ከም ካልኣይ ገጽ ናይ ሓደ ቀርሺ ምስ ስርዓት ኣስመራ ከመሳስልዎ ዝተነዝሐ መናፍሓትን ሓሶታትን እናፈሸለ ይኸይድ ምህላዉ እዩ። ብድሕሪ ሕጂ ነዚ ብዝምልከት ዝቕልቀል ከኣ ኣጉል ሽጣራን ዝጠፈሸ ኣገባብን እዩ ክኸውን። ስለዚ መን እዩ ሰልፊ ዲሞክራሲ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ ምግላጽ ደጊም መዓልቱ ወይ ግዚኡ ኣኺሉ እዩ። እዚ ሰልፊ እዚ ብሃገራውነቱን ፖለቲካዊ ራኢይኡን ህዝቢ ከይርደኦ፡ ከይፈልጦን ከይዓስሎን ብዝተፈልለዩ ወገናት ንምዕንቃፍ፡ ኣንጻሩ ዝንዛሕ ዝነበረ ምዃኑ መባእታዊ ናይ ፖለቲካ ኣፍልጦ ንዘለዎ ኣካል ንጹር እዩ።
እዚ ሰልፊ እዚ ዝገብሮ መዓልታዊ ምንቅስቓሳትን ተጻዋርነትን ንኸምክኑ ካብ ነዊሕ ግዜ ኣትሒዙ ካሳብ እዛ ሰዓት እዚኣ ሕብርታቱን ዓይነቱን እናተቐያየረ ዝውርወር ዝነበረ ሓሶታት እናፈዀሰ ይብለል’ኳ እንተሃለወ፥ ጸጸኒሖም ዝቕልቀሉ ባእታታት ግን ፈጺሞም ካብቲ እኩይ ተግባራቶም ምሉእ ብምሉእ ኣይተዓገሱን። እዚ ሰልፊ እዚ ተበዲሉ እንከሎ ከም በደለኛን፥ ጸረ-ሃገርን ሓድነትን ርእይቶ ካለኦት ዘይቕበልን ገይሮም ከቕርብዎን ክኸስዎን እንከለዉ፡ ርኢና ከምዘይረኣና ክንሓልፎ ጸኒሕና። ናይዚ ሕድገት ቀዳማይ ምኽንያትና ነቲ ንህዝብና ጅሆ ሒዙ ዝሳቒ ዘሎ ምውጋእ ምዃኑ ስለ ኣነቐድም እዩ። በቲ ካልእ ወገን ከኣ ሓሶትን ጠቐነን ውዒሉ ሓዲሩ ዝፈሽልን ዝፈኲስን ምዃኑ ስለ እንርዳእ እዩ። እዚ ክበሃል እንከሎ ግና እቲ ዘይሓላፍነታዊ ጸለመታት ሃስያታት ኣይነበሮን ማለት ኣይኮነን።
እቲ ክርአ ዝጸንሐ ጹረትን ትዕግስትን መንቀሊኡ ሕመቕ ዘይኮነ፡ ምእንቲ ሓድነት ህዝብን ሃገርን እዩ። በዚ ምኽንያት ክግለጽ ዝግበኦ ዘይተገልጸ ሓቅታት ከም ዝተሓልፈ ፍሉጥ እዩ። እቶም ነዚ ሰልፊ ክጸልእዎን ከርሕቕዎን ዝህቅኑ ገለ ወገናት ኣካይደኦም ንረብሓ ኩላትና ይመስሎም ይነብር። ውድባት ኣይረብሓን እየን፥ ኣይሰርሓን እየን እናተባህለ ብድፉኑ ምውራይ ነዚ ሰልፊ ሃስይዎ እዩ። እቶም ከምኡ ዓይነት ጃምላዊ ፍርዲ ዝህቡ ሰልፍና ይሰርሖ ንዝነበረ ይድምስሱ ስለ ዝነበሩ። ሎሚ ከኣ ሕሉፍ ሓሊፍዎም ንሰልፍና መዳርግቲ’ቲ ንህዝብና ዝጭቚንን ዘጋፍዕን ዘሎ ስርዓት እዩ ክብሉ ይመጣጠሩ ኣለዉ። ኣብዚ ጉዳያት እቲ መንእሰይ ይኹን እቲ ብዛዕባ እዚ ሰልፊ ኣፍልጦ ዘይብሉ ወገናት ምእንቲ ክመዝን፥ ገለ ካብቲ ንጹር ራኢ እዚ ሰልፊ ምጥቃስ ኣድላዪነት ኣለዎ።
1- ስልጣን ዋንኡ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ እዩ።
2- ንእንኮ ሰልፊ ዘይኮነስ ኣብዝሓ ሰልፍታት የድልየና።
3- ስርዓት ህግደፍ ምልጋስ ብኤርትራዊ ሓይልን ለውጢ ካብ ውሽጥን።
4- ህልዊ ስርዓት ኣልጊስካ፡ ኣብ ክንድኡ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ ብዘጽድቖ ቅዋም ዝግዛእ መንግስቲ ምምስራት
5- ንጉዳይ ሃገር ሓቢርካ ብምስራሕን ዲሞክራሲያዊ ስርዓት ብምትካልን መሰል ኩለን ብሄራት፡ ኣውራጃታትን ውልቀሰብን ዘውሕስ ሕጊ ክሕንጸጽ።
6- ግርጭታት ብሰላማውን ዲምክራሲያውን ኣገባብ ምፍታሕን ሰላማዊ ምቅብባል ስልጣንን፥
7- ንኹሉ ዝሓቊፍ ሰፊሕ ሃገራዊ ጽላል ክምስረት
8- ስልጣንን ጸጋታትን ሃገር ብማዕረ ክመቓራሕ ... ወዘተ ዝኣምንን ንምዕዋቱ ዝቃለስን ሰልፊ እዩ።
እዚ ገለ ካብቲ መትከላት ናይቲ ሰልፊ እዩ። ስለዚ ብሓደ ወገን ምልክን ምልካዊ ኣተሓሳስባን በቲ ካልእ ወገን ድማ ኣብ ቅድሚ ሕጂ ኩሉ ማዕረ ምዃኑን ልዕሊ ሕጊ ክኸዱ ዝደልዩ ንኸይቅልቀሉን ብትብዓት ዝቃለስ ዘሎ ሰልፊ እዩ። በዚ መሰረት ኣቶም እቲ ጽባሕ ክምስረት ንቃለሰሉ ዘለና ስርዓት ካብዚ ወጻኢ ክኸውን ዝጽበዩ ወገናት ዝነዝሕዎ ጸለመ ንፋስ ከምዝወቕዖ ሓሰር ዝብተን ክኸውን እዩ።
ድራር መንታይ
ኣኽብሮት ማለት ክብረት ንዝግበኦ ክብሪ ምሃብን፡ ክብረትን ሓድነትን ኣብ ሰብ ማለት ኢዩ። ምክብባር እንተድኣ ኣልዩና ንህይወት ካብኡ ንላዕሊ ዘገድስ ነገር የለን።ኣኽብሮት ብፍላይ በቶም ኣብ ህይወቶም ብዙሕ ተመክሮ ዝደለቡ ናይ ዕድመ ሰብ ጸጋ ወይ በቶም ንብዙሕ ዓመታት ኣብ ትምህርቲ ግዜኦም ዘሕለፉ ምሁራት ሰባት ግቡእ ክብሪ ረኺባ ኢያ። ምኽንያቱ ኣብ ጉዕዞ ህይወት፣ ፍልጠት፣ኣርሒቕካ ምሕሳብን ልቦናን ብብዙሕ ጻዕሪን ብቕጻሊ ትምህርቲ ናይ ስነ ስርዓትን (ስነ-ምግባር) ዝርከብ ኢዩ። ንምክብባር ከም ሕያውነት ወይ ጽቡቕ ጠባይ ምኹስኳስ ማለት ንኹሉ ዕላማ፣እምነት ወይ ተግባር ናይ ሰባት ናይ ግድን ክብሪ ይግበኦም’ዩ ማለት ዘይኮነ፣ንመሰረታዊ ክብሪ ናይ ደቂ ሰባት ንካልኦት ክንፈልጠሎም ኣሎና ማለት’ዩ። ዋላ’ውን ዕላማኦምን ክብሩን ካብ ናትና ዝተፈልየ ወይ ምስ ናትና ዘይሳማማዕ አንተኾነ። ኣብ ማሕበረ-ሰብና ወይ ሃይማኖታዊ ትካላትና ምክብባር ማለት ንኻልኦት ሰባት ግዳይ ናይ ጽልእን ቂምን ብምግባር ፈጠርቲ ናዕብን ህውከትን ከም ዝኾኑ ምግባር ማለት ኣይኮነን። ሓፈሻዊ ኣረኣእያ ናይ ምክብባር እምበኣር ኣብ መንጎና ሰላምን ስምምዕን ዘራጋግጽ ኮይኑ፣ ነብሲ-ወከፍ ሰብ ግዲኡ ከበርክት ወይ ናይ ምምሃር ድሌት እንተዽኣ ኣልዩና’ውን ክምህረና ትጽቢት ይግበር።
እዛ ጥዕምቲ ቤትና ጠባይና ዝህነጸሉ ሚዛን ኣመለኻኽታና ዝቕረጸሉ መሰረታዊትን ዝበለጸትን ቤት ትምህርቲ ኢያ። ንመሰረታዊ ናይ ሞራል መትከልን ማሕበራዊ ጠባያትን ካብቲ ኣቛቑማ ናይ ሓንቲ ስድራ-ቤት ካብ ወለድና ኢና እንመሃር። ኣኽብሮት ምስ ስነ-ምግባርን ሞራልን ብምትሕሓዝ ኣብ ቤትና እነማዕብሎ ትኽክለኛ ጠባይ ኢዩ። ሃብትና እንተ ጠፍኤ ኣብ ዝኾነ ግዜ ዝትካእ ስለ ዝኾነ ብዙሕ እንኸስሮ የልቦን፣ነቲ ብኣኽብሮት ዝግለጽ ጠባይና እንተ ኣጥፋእና ግን ኩሉ ነገር ከሲርና ማለት’ዩ። ንካልኦት ከነፍቅርን ከነኽብርን እንኽእል ንነብስና ከነፍቅርን ከነኽብርን ከሎና ጥራሕ ስለ ዝኾነ፣ኣኽብሮት ንነብስና ከመይ ዝበለ ሞራል ከም ዘሎና ዝሕብር ክኸውን ከሎ፣ኣኽብሮት ንኻልኦት ሰባት ግን ኩነታት ጠባይና ዝሕብር ብምዃኑ፣ንዝኾነ ሰብ ምኽባር ልቦናን ክብርን ዝህብ ከም ዝኾነ ክንግንዘብ ይግባእ።እሙናት ኣዕሩኽ ክህልዉና ንደሊ እንተድኣ ኮይና፣ንኩሉ ሰብ ከነኽብር ይግባኣና።ምኽንያቱ ክብሪ ሰብ ዘይሕልዉ ሰባት ውሑዳት ኣዕሩኽትን ተሓባበርትን ይህልውዎም፣ ካልኦት ሰባት’ውን ክቐርብዎም ሕጉሳት ኣይኮኑን።እምበኣር ኣብ ህይወትና ክንከብር ንደሊ እንተድኣ ኮይና፣ብዘይኣፈላላይ ናይ ዕድመ፣ዓሌት፣ ጾታ፣ ሃይማኖት ንኻልኦት ሰባት ከነኽብር ኣሎና።ነብሲ-ወከፍ ሰብ ከም ሰብ መጠን ክኽበር ኣለዎ፣ ናቱ ወይ ናታ ፋይናንሲያዊ ትሕዝቶ፣ ሃይማኖታዊ እምነት፣ ማሕበራዊ ምትእስሳር፣ፖሊቲካዊ ስነ-ሓሳብ ብዘየገድስ ።ንኻልኦት ሰባት ከነኽብር ከሎና ንነብስና ነኽብር ኣሎና ማለት’ዩ። ንነብስና እንተ ኣኽበርና ስነ-ስርዓት ከም ዝህልወና ይገብር፣እቲ እነርእዮ ስነ-ስርዓት ከኣ ናይ ካልኦት ሰባት ስምዒት ከም እንርዳእ ይገብረና።ዋላ ንዓና’ውን ዝምልከት እንተ ዘይኮነ፣ንካልእ ሰብ ግን ኩሉ ነገር ማለት ስለ ዝኾነ ናይ ኮልኦት ሰባት ስምዒት ከነኽብር የድልየና። ኣኽብሮትና ንካልእ ሰብ ብምርኣይና ብግልጺ ሓደ ኣገዳሲ ክፋል ኣብ ምህናጽ ጥቡቕ ውልቃዊ ዝምድና ዝሕግዝ ወሳኒ ተግባር ነርኢ ኣሎና። እዛ እትስዕብ ኣገዳሲት ሓጻር ታሪኽ ንፍረ-ነገርን ኣድላይነትን ኣኽብሮት ንነብስኻን ንካልኦትን እተዘንቱ ስለ ዝኾነት ተገዲስና ንከታተልንመሃር።
ሓደ ግዜ ሓደ ድኹም ሽማግለ ሰብኣይ ምስ ወዱን ሰበይቲ ወዱን ምስ ሓደ ወዲ ኣርባዕተ ዓመት ወዲ ወዱን ክነብር ከደ።ኣእዳው ናይቲ ሽማግለ ሰበኣይ ዘንቀጥቅጣ፣ኣዒንቱ ጽልግልግ ዝብላ፣ኣብ ኣሰጓጉማኡ ዝተዓናቐፍ ነበረ።.እቶም ስድራ ኣብ ናይ ድራር ጠረጰዛ ብሓባር ይበልዑ ነበሩ፣እንተኾነ እተን ዘንፈጥፍጣ ኣእዳውን ዘይርእያ ድኹማት ኣዒንትን ናይቲ ሽማግለ ኣብ መግቢ ሓቢርካ ምብላዕ ሽግር ፈጠራ። ዓይኒ-ዓተር ካብ ማንካኡ ኣንከራርየን ናብ ምድሪ-ቤት ወደቓ፣ጸባ ዝሓዘ ኩባያ ምስ ኣልዓለ እቲ ጸባ ናብቲ ጨርቂ መሸፈን ጠረጴዛ ፈሰሰ፣ወዱ ነቲ ሽማግለን ሰበይቲ ወዱን ብሰንኪ’ቲ ሽማግለ ሰብኣይ ዘጋጠመ ርስሓትን ድብልቕልቅን ሓረቑ።ስለዚ ወዱ ብዛዕባ ኣቦይ ሓደ ነገር ክንገብር ኣሎና በለ፣ብብዝሒ ዝፈስስ ጸባን፣ብርቱዕ ድምጺ ዝህብ ኣበላልዕዑን ናብ ምድሪ-ቤት ዝወደቐ መግብን ቀሊል ኣይኮነን፣ብማለት እቶም ሰብኣይን ሰበይትን ሓንቲ ንእሽቶ ጠረጴዛ ኣብ ኩርናዕ ናይቲ መግቢ ዝብለዖ ክፍሊ ኣዳለዉ።እቲ ኣባሕጎ ንበይኑ ኣብታ ንእሽቶ ጠረጴዛ እናተመገበ፣እቶም ዝተረፉ ስድራ-ቤት ግን ኣብቲ ናይ ስድራ-ቤት መብልዒ ጠረጴዛ እናተሓጎሱ ብሓባር ይምገቡ ነበሩ።እቲ ኣባሕጎ በብግዚኡ ክልተ-ሰለስተ ሸሓኒ ሰይሩ ስለ ዝነበረ፣ብድሕሪ’ዚ መግቡ ኣብ ብዕንጨቲ ዝተሰርሐ ዕሙቕ ዝበለ ሸሓኒ ይምገብ ነበረ።እቶም ስድራ-ቤት ናብቲ ኣባሕጎ ገጾም ቁሊሕ እንተበሉ ሓደ-ሓደ ግዜ ንበይኑ ኮፍ ኢሉ ክነብዕ ይረኤ።ገለ ፋርኬታ ወይ መግቢ እንተ ኣውደቐ እቶም ሰብኣይን ሰበይትን ኣብኡ ዘውጽእዎ ዝነበሩ መሪር ቃላት ሓውሲ ተግሳጽ ወይ ኩራ ነበረ። ነዚ ኩሉ ተግባር ናይቶም ሰብኣይን ሰበይትን እቲ ወዲ ኣርባዕተ ዓመት ሕጻን ብጽሞና ይዕዘብ ነበረ።ሓደ ምሸት ቅድሚ ድራር እቲ ኣቦ፣ ነቲ ሕጻን ወዱ ኣብ ምድሪ-ቤት ከፍ ኢሉ ብስብርባር እንጨቲ ኳሕኳሕ ከብል ከሎ ተዓዘቦሞ፣ብልኡም ቃላት እንታይ ይገብር ከም ዘሎ ሓተቶ፣እቲ ሕጻን ድማ ከምቲ ናይ ኣቡኡ ልስልስ ብዝበሉ ቃላት ኦ !! ንእሽቶ ሸሓኒ ኢየ ዘዳሉ ዘለኹ፣ ኣነ ምስ ዓበኹ ንዓኻን ንማማን መብልዒ ዝኾናኹም ኢሉ ብምምላሽ፣ፍሽኽ ኢሉ ስርሑ ናብ ምቕጻል ከደ።
ቃላት ናይ’ቲ ሕጻን ነቶም ወለዲ ኣዚዩ ስለ ዝተሰመዖም ክዛረቡ ኣይከኣሉን፣በቲ ዝተሰምዖም ናይ ሕሊና ወቐሳ ንብዓቶም ከም ውሕጅ ብምዕጉርቶም ወረር ኢሉ ወረደ።ክዛረቡኳ እንተ ዘይከኣሉ ክልቲኦም እንታይ ከም ዝግበር ፈለጡ፣እቲ ሰብኣይ ንናይ ኣቡኡ ኣእዳው ብምሓዝ ቀስ ኢሉ መሪሑ ኣብታ ናይ ስድራ-ቤት ጠረጴዛ ኣቐመጦ።ዝተረፈት ዕድመ-ህይወቱ ድማ እቲ ኣባሕጎ ኣብታ ናይ ስድራ-ቤት ጠረጴዛ እናተመገበ ሓለፈ።ካብዚ ንደሓር ሰብኣይ ይኹን ሰበይቱ ብዛዕባ’ቲ ዝወድቕ ፋርኬታ፣ዝፈስስ ጸባ ይኹን ዝበላሾ ጨርቂ- ጠረጴዛ ብዙሕ ምግዳስ ኣይነበሮምን።
እምበኣር ካብዛ ሓጻር ታሪኽ እዚኣ እንመሃሮ ፍረ-ነገር ወይ ስነ-ምግባር ሓደ ሰብ “ዝዘርኦ ከም ዝዓጽድ ወይ ከም ዝሓፍስ” ኢዩ።ምስ ወለድና ዘሎና ዝምድና ወይ ርክብ ብዘየገድስ፣ ወለድና ብህይወት ካባና ምስ ተፈልዩ ጥራሕ ኢና ኩሉ ግዜ እንናፍቖም።ነቲ ጽቡቕ ተግባራቶምን ልቦናኦምን ልዑል ዋጋ ብምሃብ ኩሉ ግዜ ብኣኽብሮት ንዝክሮም።እምበኣር ንደቅና ኩሉ ግዜ ነኽብሮምን ንከናኸኖምን እንተድኣ ኮይና፣ንሳቶም’ውን ብግዲኦም ከምቲ ኣብ ታሪኽ ናይ’ቲ ሽማግለ ሰብኣይ ዝረኣናዮ ምስ ኣረግናን ምስ ደኸምናን ከኽብሩናን ክካናኸኑናን ኢዮም። “ኢድ ሸናሒት ጸናሒት” ስለ ዝኾነ። ልክዕ’ዩ ፍልጠት እንተድኣ ሰኒቕና፣ሞያዊ ብቕዓት ንምውሓስ ዕድል ይህበና።ብተዛማዲ ጽቡቕ ጠባይ እንተድኣ መስሪትና፣ ናይ ምክብባር ጠባይ ከነማዕብል ዕድል ይህበና።ናይ ጥንቲ ወለድና ጽቡቕ ሞራል ወይ ስነ-ስርዓት ነይሩዎም ኢዩ።ምኽንያቱ ዝነኣድ ጥበብ ወይ ብልሓት ስለ ዝነበሮም።እንተኾነ ነቲ ካብ ወለድና ዝወረስናዮ ዝነኣድ ናይ ሞራናን ስነ-ስርዓትናን ጠቕሚ ኣብ ኤርትራ ኣባና ክብጽሕ በቢቑሩብ ክሃስስ(ከንቆልቁል) ጀሚሩ። ምኽንያቱ ገለ ውልቀሰባት ነቶም ብዕድመ ዝደፍኡ ወለዲ ኣብ ክንዲ ብትሕትናን ብኣኽብሮትን ኣጸዋውዓ ኣቱም ኣቦይ፣ ኣትን ኣደይ ምባል ቁንጭል ኣቢልካ ኣታ ሰብኣይ! ኣቲ ሰበይቲ! ኢሎም ብምጽዋእ ከሕስርዎምን ከናሽዉዎምን ስለ ዝጀመሩ።ንሕና እቶም ኣብ ወጻኢ እንነብር ዘሎና’ውን ነቲ ካብ ሽማግለታትና ዝወረስናዮ ዝነኣድ ሞራልን ጽቡቕ ስነ-ምግባርን ንኽብረዝ ኣብ ምቅልጣፉ ሓጋዚ ተራ ተጻዊትና ኢና።ምኽንያቱ ኣብ ወጻኢ መጺና ነቶም ካባና ዝተፈልየ ባህላዊ ተመክሮታትን ጽልዋታቶምን ስለ ዝተጠቐምና።ኩሎም እቶም ናይ ቅኑዕ ሞራል ክብርታትን ዝነኣዱ ናይ ጠባይ ተመክሮታትን ካብ ወለድና ዝተመሃርናዮም ናብ መንእሰያት ተካእትና ካብ ምትሕልላፍ ብርግጽ ፈሺልና ኢና።ምኽንያቱ ምክብባር ንጽቡቕ ተግባር ኣዚዩ ዝነኣድ ምዃኑ ክንርደኦ ኣይከኣልናን። ምናልባት ብምስትብሃል ትዕዝብቲ ኣይንወስደሉን ንኸውን እምበር ፣ኩሉ’ቲ ኣብ ርእሲ ካልእ ሰብ እንገብሮ ሕማቅ ተግባራት ተመሊሱ ንዓና ኢዩ ዘሕስረና። እቲ ኣብ ህይወትና ንነዊሕ ግዜ ዘዋህለልናዮ እከይ ተግባራት እናጸንሐ ኢዩ ዝርብሸና።ኣብ መጨርሽታኡ ከኣ ናብ ሓደ ኣጸያፊ ፍጡር ኣብ ዓለም ይልውጠና።እምበኣር ነዚ ኣብ ወጻኢ ዝነብር ሕብረተ-ሰብና ዘርእዮ ዘሎ ናይ ሞራል ውድቀት(ፍዘት) ንምብርባር ምንቅስቓስ ዘድለየና ይመስል። መናድቕ ናይ ባህላዊ ውርሻናን ልምዳዊ ተመክሮታትናን ብዘይተደለይቲ ለውጥታት ኣብ ጠባያታትና ተሰባቢሮም’ዮም። ፋሕ-ብትን ዝኣተዎ ማሕበረ-ሰብ፣ ዝተፋናጨሉ ሃይማኖታዊ ትካላትን ዝተበታተኑ ስድራ-ቤታትን ኣለዉና።ሕብረተ-ሰብና ብዘሕዝን ኩነታት ይከፋፈል ከምዘሎ ዘረዳኣካ ናይ ሰብኣይን ሰበይትን ፍትሕን ውላድ ካብ ወለዶም ምፍልላይን ልሙድ ተርእዮ ኮይኑ’ሎ።ገለ ካብ ደቅና’ውን ኣንፈቶም ስሒቶም፣ካብ ትምህርቶም ብምቁራጽ ሸቀጥቲ ሓሺሽን ኣባላት ናይ ገበነኛታት ጉጅለ(gangs) ኮይኖም ዝርኣዩ ውሑዳት ኣይኮኑን።ንሕናን ደቅናን ዘጋጥመና ዘሎ ሽግር ምኽንያት ማሕበረ-ሰብናን ሃይማኖታዊ ትካላትናን በቲ መርዛም ፖሊትካ ዝተለኽፉን ዝተመረዙን ብምዃኖም ከም ውጽኢት ናቱ ከኣ ኣብ ሓደ ክጥርንፉናን ነንሓድሕድና ከም እንተሓጋገዝን ክገብሩናን ኣይከኣሉን። ፖሊቲካ እቲ ሓቀኛ ትርጉም ናይ’ቲ ቃል ቅኑዕን ሰላማዊን ኢዩ።ብዘተኣማምንን ብጥንቃቐን እንተድኣ ተሰሪሑሎ እውን ገስጋሲ ክኸውን ዝኽእል’ዩ።ኣብ ኩነታትና ግን እቲ ሽግር ዝኸውን ዘሎ ንፖሊቲካ ብሕጋዊ መንገዲን ትኽክለኛ መዋቕሩን ተረዲእና ኣይንሙከሮን ኢና።ብስም ፖሊቲካ ዘይተደለይቲ ሕማቕ ስጉምትታት ይውሰዱ።ከም ሳዕቤኑ ከኣ ኣብ ብዙሕ ህልዊ ዛዕባታት ናይዞም ኣብ ወጻኢ ዘሎና ኤርትራዊያን ፖሊቲካ ዝለዓለ ቦታ ወይ መድረኽ ሒዙ ይርከብ።ኣብ ብዙሕ ኣብነታት ዝተሓላለኸን ዝተዓመጸን ብምዃኑ፣ከም ሓደ ምሕረት ዘይብሉ ቀታሊ ሕማም መንሽሮ ኮይኑ ኣሎ።ሕማም መንሽሮ ሓደ ግዜ ኢዩ ዝቐትል፣እዚ ኣባና ወሪዱ ዘሎ ረሳሕ ፖሊቲካ ግን መዓልታዊ ኢዩ ዝቐትል፣ስለዚ ነዚ ኣብ ሕብረተ-ሰብና ዝደሚ ዘሎ ጠጠዎ ከነብሎ ኣሎና፣ምኽንያቱ እዚ ዝቕጽል ዘሎ ሕማቕ ሳዕቤናት ናይ ፖሊቲካና ኣብ ወጻኢ ንዘሎና ኤርትራዊያን ኣብ ስድራ-ቤታት ይኹን ኣብ ውልቀሰባት ደረጃ ቀታሊ ተመክሮ ኮይኑ ኣሎ። እምበኣር እዛ እትስዕብ ታሪኽ ናይ ደማስን ደባስን ብልክዕ ከም ኣብነት ናይ ሕማቕ ተግባርና ማለት ነዞም ኣብ ወጻኢ እንነብር ሕብረተሰብና ዘሎ ኩነታት ፖሊትካ ስለ እትገልጽ ብምስትውዓል ንከታተል።
ደማስን ደባስን ንነዊሕ ግዜ ጥቡቕ ዕርክነት ነበሮም።ኣብ ኤርትራ ኣብ ካልኣይ ደረጃ ሓቢሮም ምስ ተማህሩ፣ናብ ኣሜሪካ’ውን ብሓደ መጺኦም ብሓደ ዑቕባ ረኺቦም።ኣብ ሓደ ከተማ ከም ጎረባብቲ ይነብሩ ነይሮም።ክልቲኦም ዓበይቲ ስድራ-ቤት ማለት ደማስ ምስ በዓልቲ ቤቱ ሽዱሽተ ቆልዑ፣ደባስ ድማ ምስ በዓልቲ ቤቱ ሓሙሽተ ቆልዑ ነይሮሞም።ደማስን ደባስን መራሕቲ ታክሲ ክኾኑ ከለዉ ፣ኣንስቶም ሓቢረን ኣብ ናይ ጽጉማት መናበዪ ቤት ይሰርሓ። ደቆም ኣዚዮም ዝፋቐሩ ኣዕሩኽ ብምዃን ባምቡላታትን ናይ መጻወቲ ቪድዮታት እናተማቐሉን እንዳ ተላዋወጡን ናብ ሓደ ቤት ትምህርቲ እናተማላለሱ ኣብ ሓደ ዓይነት ስፖርት ወይ ምውስዋስ ኣካላት እናሰርሑ ናይ ሓባር ኣዕሩኽቲ እናሃለውዎም ሓቢሮም ኢዮም ዓብዮም።እዞም ክልተ ስድራ-ቤታት ዋላ’ኳ ኣብ ዝተፋላለያ ክልተ ገዛውቲ ይንበሩ’ምበር ዳርጋ ከም ሓደ ዓቢ ስድራ-ቤት ኢዮም ነይሮም።ዝኾነ ይኹን ማሕበራዊ ምንቅስቓሳት ከም ናብ ዙረት(ሽርሽር) ምኻድ ወይ ናብ ኤርትራ ምብጻሕ ከም ሓደ ስድራ-ቤት መጠን ሓቢሮም ኢዮም ዝጓዓዙ ነይሮም።ደማስን ደባስን ኣብ ናይ ቡን ዕረፍቶም ኣብ ስታር-ባክስ እናተራኸቡ መዓልታዊ ብዛዕባ ደቆም፣ስድራ-ቤቶም፣ቤተ ክርስትያን ብፍላይ ድማ ብዛዕባ ፖሊቲካ የዕልሉ ነይሮም።ብዛዕባ ፖሊቲካ ዝርርብ ኣብ ዝጀመሩሉ ግዜ ዝልዓል ርሱን ክትዕ ኣብ መንጎኦም ክሃድእ ዘይክእል ቅርሕንቲ ስለ ዝተፈጥረ እቲ ዘይጥዑይን ዘሕርቕን ዝምድና ቀስ-ብቐስ ኣብዞም ክልተ ሕሙማት ኣራእስ ስድራ-ቤታት ጽልእን ቅርሕንትን ከም ዝምዕብል ኮነ። ድሕሪ ቁሩብ ግዜ ብሰንክ’ቲ ዘጋጠመ ናይ ፖሊቲካ ዘይምስምማዕ እቲ ብቀጻሊ ዝራኸቡዎ ዝነበሩ ናይ ግዜ ቡን ዕረፍቶም ኣቋረጸ።ደማስ ናይቶም ደገፍቲ መንግስቲ ኢዮም ዝበሃሉ ጉጅለ ኣባል ምዃኑ ከፍልጥ ከሎ ደባስ ድማ ናይቶም ተቓወምቲ ዝበሃሉ ጉጅለ ኣባል ኮነ። ከም ሕማቕ ዕድል እቲ ንነዊሕ ዝጸንሐ ዕርክነቶም ብዘሕዝን ኩነታት ኣብ ሓደጋ ስለ ዝወደቐ ነንሓድሕዶም ከም ተጻላእቲ ክረኣኣዩ ጀመሩ።እቲ ዘሕዝን ነንሓድሕዶም ተጻዋዊሮም ክካባበሩ ዘይምኽኣሎም’ዩ።ከም ኣጋጣሚ ኣብ ናይ ክልቲኦም ኣዕሩኽ ገዛ እንተ ተራኸቡ’ውን ሰላም ክበሃሃሉ ፍቓደኛታት ኣይኮኑን።ናይ ክልቲኦም ኣንስቲን ደቆምን ኣብ ዝኾነ ቦታን ግዜን ዋላ’ውን ምስቶም ናይ ቀደም ኣዕሩኽቶም ማሕበራዊ ርክብ ከይገብሩን ከይተሓባበሩን ብክልቲኦም ሰብኡት ደማስን ደባስን ጽኑዕ ናይ ምኽልካል መጠንቀቕታ፣ተገይሩሎም ኢዩ።ኣብ መንጎ’ዞም ንጹሃት ስድራ-ቤታት ከምዚ ዝበለ ዝይምቹእን እከይን ኩነታት ክፍጠር ዘሕፍር’ዩ።ብተወሳኺ ብምኽንያት ፖሊቲካ ኣብ ህይወት ደቅና ዝንዛሕ ሕማቕ ሳዕቤናት ክንዕዘብ ልሙድ ተርእዮ ኮይኑ ኣሎ።ደሃብ ጓል ኣቶ ደማስን ደጀን ወዲ ኣቶ ደባስን ኣብ ካልኣይ ደረጃ እናተማህሩ ተሓጻጽዮም ኔሮም።እቲ ሕጸ ካብ መሰረቱ ብናይ ክልቲኦም ወለዲ ምትብባዕ ዝተደገፈ ኢዩ ነይሩ።ፖሊቲካዊ ምፍልላይ ናይ ደማስን ደባስን ዝጀመረሉ ደሃብን ደጀንን ናይ ኮሌጅ ቀዳማይ ዲግሪ ትምህርቶም ኣብ ዝፈጸሙሉ ግዜ ኢዩ።እቲ ዘገርም እዞም ርእሲ-ሓሰማ ዝኾኑ ክልተ ወለዲ ብሰንኪ ናይ ገዛእ ርእሶም ፖሊቲካዊ ፍልልይ ናይዞም መንእሰያት ደቆም ሕጸ ክብትንዎ’ኳ እንተደለዩ ደሃብን ደጀንን ብዘይ ፍቓድ ወለዶም ኣብ ሓደ ርሕቕ ዝበለ ከተማ ከይዶም ብቤት ፍርዲ ቃል ኪዳኖም ኣሰሩ።ንወለዶም ዝበልዎም ከኣ “ፖሊቲካኹም ናይ ርእስኹም ጉዳይ’ዩ፣መርዓና ከኣ ንዓና ጥራሕ ዝምልከት ጉዳይና’ዩ” ከም ወለድና መጠን ንፈትወኩምን ነኽብረኩምን፣ነቲ ኣብ መንጎኹም ዘሎ ናይ ፖሊቲካ ፍልልይ ኣተሓሕዛ ግን ንክልተ ንጹሃት ስድራ-ቤታት ዝበታትን ስለ ዝኾነ ኣይነኽብርን ኢና፣ይኹን እምበር ተስፋ ንገብር ሓደ ግዜ ናብ ርህራሄ ዘለዎ ስምዒት ተመሊስኩም ክትራዳድኡ።
ደሃብን ደጀንን ኣብዚ ግዜ’ዚ ኣዳምን ኣድያምን ዝተባህሉ ክልተ ምጩዋት ቆልዑ ኣለውዎም። እዞም መጻምዲ ካብ ስድራኦም ብዙሕ ርሑቕ ዘይኮነ ኣብ ሓደ ዓቢ ከተማ ሓቢሮም ይነብሩን ይሰርሑን ኣለዉ። ሓደ ሓደ ግዜ ናይ ክልቲኦም እናሕጎታት ንደቂ-ደቀን ንምብጻሕ ናይ በዓላትን(ፌስታታትን) ዕለተ-ልደቶምን ዝኸውን ህያባት ሒዘናሎም ይመጻ። ኣዳምን ኣድያምን ግን ዘሰቅቕ ተመክሮ ካብ ወለዶም ስለ ዝተማህሩ ምስ ዓበዩ ናይ ዝኾነት ሃገር ፖሊቲካ ክሰምዑን ከንብቡን ዝግደሱ ኣይነበሩን። ስለዚ ከም ጽቡቕ ኣጋጣሚ ደሃብን ደጀንን ኣንጻር’ቲ ዘይረብሕ ኣተሓሳስባ ናይ ወለዶም ጸኒዖም ብምምካት ኣብ ሾቶኦም ክበጽሑ ክኢሎም። ይኹን’ምበር ደቅና ጌና ነቲ መናድቕ ናይ ጭካኔን ድንቁርናን ናይ ወለዶም ክሰብርዎ ኣይከኣሉን። ሓደ ካብቲ ትርጉም ዘይብሉ ናይ ድንቁርና ስራሕ ኣብ ወለዲ እንዕዘቦ ገለ ካብ ደቅና ሓንቲ ኤርትራዊት ጓል ኣውራጃኦም እንተ ዘይኮይና ወይ ወለዶም ሓደ ፖሊቲካዊ መርገጽ እንተ ዘይኣለዎም ክማራዓዉ ኣይፍቀደሎምን። ብካልእ ኣዘራርባ ንሕና ኣብ መንጎ ስድራ-ቤታትን ኣብ መንጎ ውልቀሰባትን ኣብ ወጻኢ ንዘሎ ሕብረተ-ሰብና ብቑዕ ንዘይኮነ ምኽንያት ናይ ግርጭትን ፖሊትካዊ ፍልልያትን ብዘይ ብረት ሲቪላዊ ኵናት ንምብራዕ ዝኣወጅና ንመስል።
ፖሊቲካ ኣብ ናይ ኤርትራ ኦርቶዶክስ ተዋህዶ ኣብያተ-ክርስትያናት ንምቁጽጻር ብዝግበር ውጥን፣ ንጥፈታት ናይ ምእመናን ንምቁጽጻር ኣዕናዊ ስጉምታት ተወሲዱ’ዩ። ኩልና ከም እንፈልጦ ናይ ኤርትራ ኦርቶዶክስ ተዋህዶ ኣብያተ-ክርስትያናት ኣብ ወጻኢ ሃገራት ዘለዋ ኣብ ክልተ ሃገረ ስብከታት ተኸፊለን ኣለዋ። ሓደ ጉጅለ ናይተን ኣብያተ ክርስትያናት(ሓደ ዳዮስስ) ንዕላማ መንግስቲ ደጋፊ ክኸውን ከሎ፣እቲ ካልኣይ ጉጅለ ናይ ኣብያተ ክርስትያናት(ካለኣይ ዳዮስስ) ንምፍራስ ቀኖና (ሕጊ) ናይ ኤርትራ ኦርቶዶክስ ተዋህዶ ቤተ ክርስትያን ማለት ንናይ ብጹዕ ወቅዱስ ፓትሪያርክ እንጦንዮስ ካብ ማዓርጎም ብዘይ ሕጊ ምውራድ ንዝተወስደ ውሳኔ ዝቃወም ኣካል ኢዩ። እምበኣር ምፍንጫል ኣብያተ ክርስትያናት ኣብ ስድራ-ቤታት ኤርትራ ዘኸትሎ ሕማቕ ሳዕቤን ካብዛ ሓጻር ታሪኽ ናይ ወዳጀን ወረጃን ንከታተል። ወዳጀን ወረጃን እተባህሉ ሰብኣይን ሰበይትን ኮይኖም ምስ ሓሙሽተ ኣባጽሕ ደቆምን ኣርባዕተ ደቂ-ደቆምን ብሓባር ን40 ዓመታት ነበሩ።ወዳጀን ወረጃን ኣብ ሓደ ናይ ኤርትራ ኦርቶዶክስ ቤተክርስትያን ማለት ቅድሚ ኣብ ክልተ ምፍንጫለን ሓቢሮም ይመላለሱ ነይሮም።ወዳጀን ወረጃን ቅድሚ’ቲ ናብ ቤተ-ክርስትያን ዝኣተወ ፖሊቲካ ጽቡቕ ምርድዳእ ስለ ዝነበሮም ብኣዕሩኽቶምን ቤተ-ሰቦምን ኣዚዮም ዝተኸበሩን ዝተፈዉን ነበሩ። ቅድሚ ውሑድ ዓመታት ግን ወዳጀ ምስቶም ኣንጻር ምግሃስ ቀኖና ቤተ ክርስትያን ጠጠው ዝበሉ ኣብያተ ክርስትያናት ከምልኽ (ክመላለስ) ወሰነ። ወረጃ ድማ ኣብተን ደገፍቲ ውሳኔ መንግስቲ ናይ ምግሃስ ቀኖና ዝኾና ኣብያተ ክርስትያናት ንኽትመላለስ ወይ ከተምልኽ ወሰነት። ምፍንጫል ቤተ ክርስትያን ዘምጽኦ ሰበብ ወዳጀን ወረጃን ብዕርቂ ክፍታሕ ኣብ ዘይክእለሉ ፍልልይን ዘይምስምማዕን ኩነታት ተፈጥረ። ኣብዚ ህሞት’ዚ ኣብ መንጎ ሰብኣይን ሰበይትን ምክብባር ስለ ዘየለ ሓደ ናይ ጽልኢ ኩነት ናብ ካልእ ናይ ጽልኢ ኩነት እናማዕበለ፣ ዘይምርድዳኦም ናብ ዝለዓለ ደረጃ ብምኻዱ፣ነዊሕ ከይሰጎመ ኩነታት ቃል ኪዳኖም ኣብ ሽግር ወደቐ። እዞም መጻምዲ’ዚኦም ተዳናጊሮም ወይ ካብ ግጉይ እምነት ንምድሓን ንቃል-ኪዳኖም ኣብ ከምዚ ዝበለ ከቢድ ሓደጋ ከውድቕዎ ብምኽኣሎም፣ኣብ መጨረሻ ቃል ኪዳኖም ብፍትሕ ክድምደም ወሰኑ። ኣብተን ክልተ ኣብያተ ክርስትያናት ዝነበሩ ምእመናንን ካህናትን ነቲ ቃል ኪዳን ናብ ንቡር ንምምላሱን ኣብ መንጎ ወዳጀን ወረጃን ሰላምን ስምምዕን ክፍጠረሉ ዝከአለሉ ጉዳይ ንምግባር ብመንጎኝነት ጻዕሮም ከካይዱ ኣይከኣሉን። ደቆም ግን ንኣቦኦምን ኣዲኦምን ኣቃራሪቦም ብሓደ ሓቢሮም ብሰላም ንሓዋሩ ክነብሩ ዝከኣሎም ፈቲኖም’ዮም ፣እንተኾነ እቶም ክልተ ወለዲ ኣዚዮም ደረቃት(ነቓጻት) ስለ ዝነበሩ ንደቆም ክሰምዕዎም ኣይከኣሉን።ቁም ነገርን ዕላማን ናብ ቤተ ክርስትያን ምኻድ ተነጺጉ ወይ ተረሲዑ ወይ ድማ ነዞም ተረርቲ ርእሲ ክልተ ወለዲ ትርጉም ዘይህቦም ብላሽ ኢዩ ነይሩ ማለት’ዩ። ብካልእ ኣዛራርባ ፖሊቲካ ንትምህርቲ ወንጌል ዓብሊሉን ስዒሩን ማለት’ዩ።ንደቆም ዘሕርቕን ትጽቢት ዘይተገብረሉን ውሳኔ እምበኣር ወዳጀን ወረጃን ኣብ ሽምግልናኦም ተፋላልዮም ነበሩ። ስለዚ ታሪኽ ናይ ወዳጀን ወረጃን ከምኡ’ውን ታሪኽ ናይ ደማስን ደባስን ነዞም ኣብ ስደት ዘሎና ኤርትራዊያን ብርቂ (ፍሉይ ነገር) ኣይኮነን። ከምዚ ዝበለ ኣስቃቕን ጽዩፍን ኩነታት ኣብ ብዙሓት ኣብ ስደት ዘለዋ ስድራ-ቤታት ኤርትራ ከጋጥም ክንዕዘብ ዘሕዝን’ዩ።
ምክብባር ኣዚዩ ጠቓሚ ነገር’ዩ ምኽንያቱ ሓደ ሰብ ንኻልእ ሰብ ከኽብር ስለ ዝረኤ፣ ከምኡ’ውን ውልቃዊ መሰልን ክብርን ናይ’ቲ ሰብ ከም ሰብ መጠን ስለ እትዕቅበሉ። ምክብባር፣ መብዝሕትኡ ግዜ ስምምዕ ዘለዎ ቤትን ሰላም ዝሰፈኖ ማሕበራዊ ኣከባብን ንኽምዕብል ንውሕ ዝበል ግዜ ዘድልዮ ኢዩ።ስለዚ ኣብቶም ሓድሕዳዊ ምክብባር ዘለዎም ውልቀሰባት ዘሎ ርኽክብ ንጹርን ቅኑዕን ክኸውን ኣለዎ፣ ምእንቲ ሓድነትን ጸጥታን ናይ ሓባራዊ ዝምድናኦም ክድልድል።መብዝሕትኡ ግዜ ኣኽብሮት ዝወሃብ ነቶም ዝግብኦም ሰባት’ኳ እንተኾነ ዋላ ነቶም ዘይግቦኦም ሰባት’ውን ኣኽብሮትና ከነርእዮም ኣሎና።እዚ ከኣ ካብቲ ነጸብራቕ ናይ ጠባዮም(ኣቀራርባኦም) ዘይኮነ ካብ ነጸብራቕ ጠባይና(ኣቀራርባና) ዝብገስ ክኸውን ኣለዎ።ንሕና ካብ ዝተፋላለዩ ብሄራት ማለት ብዙሕ ዝተፋላለዩ ባህልታት፣ቋንቋታት፣ዓሌታትን ሃይማኖታዊ ድሕረ-ባይታን ዘሎና፣ዝመጻእና ኢና።ናይ ከምዚ ዓይነት ፍልልይ ከኣ ኢዩ ንኩሉ ህይወታትና ኣገዳስን በዳህን ክገብሮ ዝኽእል፣እዚ ግን ንዘሎና ማሕበራዊን ፖሊቲካውን ፍልልያትና ኣወጊድና ኣብ መንጎና ምክብባር ምስ ዝህሉ ጥራሕ ኢዩ።ማሕበራዊ ዝምድናታት ከም ውልቃዊ ዕርክነትን ንቤተ-ክርስትያን ዝምልከቱ ጉዳያትን ከምቲ ኣብ ደማስን ደባስን ከምኡውን ኣብ መንጎ ወዳጀን ወረጃን ዘጋጠመ ፖሊቲካዊ ኩነታት ብውልቀሰባት ደረጃ ገደ ክህልዎ የብሉን። ነንሓድሕድና እንተድኣ ተኻባቢርና ከም ኣዕሩኽን ቤተ-ሰብን ተሓቛቝፍና፣ ቀጻሊ ዝኾነ ማሕበረሰብ፣ሰላም ዝሰፈኖም ሃይማኖታዊ ትካላትን ነቕ ዘይብሉ ስድራ-ቤታትን ከነቋቑም ምኸኣልና ኔርና።ብልክዕ ክንዝክሮ ዝግበኣና ንሓባራዊ ምርድዳእና፣ንሓባራዊ መፍትሒ ሽግርና ንሓባራዊ ብድሆታትና እቲ ቀንዲ መሰረቱ ሓድሕዳዊ ምክብባርና ምዃኑ ክንርዳእ ይግባእ።ሓደ ካብቲ መሰረታዊ ትምህርቲ ኣብ ግዜ ንእስነትና ካብ ወለድና ዝቐሰምናዮ፣ማለት ካብቶም ቅድሜና ኣብ እምነቶም ጸኒዖም ብፍርሓት ኣምላኽ እናተመርሑ ርጉእ ናይ ሰላም ጉዕዞ ዘሕለፉ ሽማግለታትና ዝተመሃርናዮ ክብርን ሓድነትን ናይ ሰባት እናሓለና ንቕድሚት ሓቢርና ክንስጉም ኢዩ። ልቦናኦም ዘዛኻኽረና ቅድሚ ሰብ ምዃን፣ፍጡር ሰብ ምዃን ባርኾት ምዃኑ ኢዩ።ብተዛማዲ ሓደ መዓልቲ ንሕና’ውን ካብቲ ንሕና እንግምቶ ኣብ ዝሓጸረ እዋን ክንሽምግል ምዃና ፈሊጥና፣ነቲ ካብ ወለድና ዝተመሃርናዮ ኩሉ ንተካእቲ መንእሰያት ደቅና ክንምህሮም ኣሎና።ደቅና ብዛዕባ ናይ ስነ-ምግባር መሰረታዊ-ሕጊ ወይ እምነት፣ብዛዕባ ናይ ስነ-ሞራል ክብሪ፣ንነብስኻን ንኻልኦትን ብከመይ ኣኽብሮትካ ተርኢ ክፈልጡ ኣባና ስለ ዝምርኮሱ ወይ ትጽቢቶም ካባና ስለ ዝኾነ ክንምህሮም ኣሎና።ንሕና ኩልና ዝተፋላለና’ኳ እንተኾና ኣብ መወዳእታ ግን ኩልና ኣሕዋትን ኣሓትን ኤርትራዊያን ስለ ዝኾና ክንሳማማዕን ክንካባበርን ይግባኣና።ንሓድሓድና እንተ ዘይተኻባቢርና ዋላ ሓደ ዘኽብርና ስለ ዘይብልና፣ስለዚ ምእንቲ ክብሪ ክንረክብ ከነኽብር ኣሎና፣ስለ’ቲ ጽቡቕ ተግባርና ከኣ ካብ ልዑል ኣምላኽ ጸጋ ንቕበል።
ደራሲ ብእንግሊዝኛ፣ ዶር/ ተስፋ ገብረመድህን
ናብ ትግርኛ ተርጓሚ፣ መም/ተኽለ ስብሃቱ ተስፉ
ዝኸበርኩም ተኸታተልቲ እዚ መርበብ፣ ሎሚ መዓልቲ ጉዳይ ስለ ዝነበረኒ ካብ ስራሕ ቀልጢፈ ወጻእኩ። ዝነበረኒ ዕማም ምስ ወዳእኩ፣ ኣብ መርበብ ቶጎሩባ ናይ ሰለስተ ገዳይም ተገደልቲ ስእሊ በቲ የመናይ ኩርናዕ ርኣኹ። እንታይ ተረኽበ ብምባል ነቲ ስእሊ ምስ ጠወቕኩዎ ኣብ ‘ስመር ቲቪ ዝብል መስኮት “ ይወስደኒ። ፎሮ ዝብልን መንነቱ ዘይፍለጥን ብጻሊም ዝተቅብኤ ስብ ዘረባ ይጅምር ። እቲ ኩሉ ጸርፉ ኣብ ኤርትራዊ ባህሊ ንቡር ዘይምዃኑ ገረመኒ ። እቶም ሰማዕቱ ነዚ ብዘይእሩም ቃላት ዝህቦ ኣስተምህሮ ፣ ዓገብ ዝብሉ ኣይኮኑን ። ከመስግንዎን ክውድስዎን ከኣ ትሰምዕ። ብዝያዳ እኳ ደኣ ኣብቲ ሰመር ሩም ኣይትዮም ንዘረባ ፎሮ እንተ ሰምዑ ደስታ ዝስምዖም እዮም ዝመስሉ: ዕድል ረኺቦም ሕቶ እንተ ሓቲቶም ከኣ ብታሕጓስ ምሉእ ለይቲ ከይደቀሱ ዝሓድሩ እዮም። ንሱ ሕቶታቶም ከምልስ እንከሎ ደስ ከም ዝበሎ: ከምቲ ኣብ ህግደፍ ዝተመሃሮ ናይ ምድንጋር ቃላት እናተጠቕመ ይምልሰሎም። ኣሜን ኢሎም ከኣ ይቕበልዎ።
ፎሮ ዝብሃል ሰብ፣ ንነዊሕ ግዜ ሰባት ክዛረብሉ ወረ ገሊኦምሲ ሓቂ መሲልዎም ዝሓዘኑን ዝጎሃዩን ኣለዉ። እንተኾነ ፎሮ ኣብ ክፍሊ ስለያ ተዋፊሩ ክሰርሕ እንከሎ ከም ፈላሲ ዳዊት ክደገም ድዩ ግዜኡ የሕልፎ ነይሩ? ወይስ ተጋደልቲ ይቐትልን ይኣስርን ነይሩ? ከምቲ ንሱ ዝብሎ ብ1978 ተሰሊፉ ነቲ ኣብ ውሽጢ ህግ ኣብ 1972, 1973 ዝነበረ ኩነታት ብዓይኑ ዝረኣየ ስለ ዘይኮነ፣ እቲ ዝትርኾ ዘሎ ብኻልኦት ናይ ሽዑ ተጋደልቲ ካሳብ ዘይተረጋገጸ፣ ሰማዕቱ ሓስዩ ከየሕስወኩም ነቲ ዝብሎ ዘሎ ክትመራመርሉ ዝሓሸ እዩ። ሓደ ኣብ ስላያ/ ሓለዋ ሰውራ፡ ዝተዋፈረ ተጋዳላይ ካልኦት ተጋደልቲ ይቐትሉ ነይሮም፣ ኣነ ግና ኢደይ ሕጹብ ከም ጲላጦስ እየ። ሓንቲ ኣይገበርኩን ክብል እንከሎ፣ ኣብ ሓራን ዲሞክራሲያዊትን ኤርትራ የራኽበና ጥራሕ ምባሉ ይሓይሽ። ኣብዚ ግዜ እዚ ካብ ባዕላዊ ከሰስትን ፍረድትን ምዃን ተቖጢብና ፣ በበታ ዘላትና ዓቕሚ ብውልቀ ወይ ከኣ ተወዲብና ኣንጻር እዚ ኢሰብኣዊ ጉጂለ ህግደፍ ምቅላስ እዩ ዝግብኣና ።
ከም ናተይ ኣፍልጦ ሰልፊ ደሞክራሲ ኤርትራ፡ ካብ ዝተመስረተትሉ ዕለት ጀሚረ ፣ ድሕሪ ሓድነት ናይ ክልቲኡ ሰልፍታት ከኣ ኣብ ሰዲህኤ ብምህላወይ ኣብ ዝተፈላለዩ እዋናት ሓቅነት ዘይብሎም መደናገርትን ኣጸለምትን ጽሑፋት ኣንጻር ራኢን ተልእኾን ሰልፊ ዲምክራሲ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ ክዝመርን ክድረፍን ሰሚዐ ኣሎኹ። እንተኾነ ኣይከም ናይ’ዚ ፎሮ ዝብሃል። ብዝኾነ ነቲ ኩሉ ጸለመ መልሲ ንምሃብ ግዜ እውን ኣይረኽበሉን። እንተኾነ ካብቲ ሓቂ ዘይብሉ ዋህዮኡ ገለ ክነፍርሰሉ።
ሀ/ ሰዲኤ (EDP) ዝመስረቱ ተጋደልቲ ከምቲ ንሱ ዝገለጾ ዘይኮነስ፡ እዞም ዝስዕቡ እዮም ፣ ዶ/ር ኣሰፋው ተኸስተ ፣ ዶ/ር ተስፋይ ግርማጼን፡ ኣንበሳደር ሕብረት በርሄ፣ ኣምባሳደር ኣድሓኖም ገብረማርማርያም፣ ኣቶ መስፍን ሓጎስን ዶ/ር በረኸት ሃብተስላሰን እዮም። እዚ ነቶም ሓቂ እትደልዩ መንእሰያት ኣገዳሲ ሓበሬታ እዩ። ኣብ ሰዲኤ ዓብዳላ ኣደም መስራቲ ዘይኮነስ፣ ኣባል ኮይኑ እውን ኣይፈልጥን። ዓብዳላ ኣደም ለንደን ምስ መጸ ብገለ ኣባላት ሰዲኤ ተሓቲቱስ ኣባል ክኽውን ከምዘይደለየ ኢና ንፈልጥ። ስለዚ ዓብደላ ኣደም ምስ ሰዲኤ ዝኾነ ዘራኽብ ነገር ኣይነበሮን የብሉን ከኣ። ስለዚ ፎሮ ነቶም ሰዓብቱ ዓብደላ ኣደም፡ መስፍንን ኣድሓኖምን መስሪቶማ ናይ ኢሳያስ ኣፈውርቂ ውድብ እያ ክብል ዘቕርቦ መደረ ሓቂ ኣይኮነን። እዞም እተጠቕሱ ዜጋታት ሰለይቲ ህግድፍ ምባሉ ከኣ ጽባሕ ምድሪ ምስ ወግሔ ተሓታቲ ኽከውን እዩ።
ለ/ ፎር ንኣንበሳደር ኣድሓኖም ገብረማርያም ካብ ተልእኮ ኢሳያስ ኣፈውርቂ ነጻ ምዃኑ ድሕሪ ምሕባር፣ ንዓብዳላ ኣደምን መስፍን ሓጎስን ግና ካብ ጸጋታት ህዝቢ ኤርትራ ዶላራት ኣብ ናይ ባንክ ሕሳባቶም ካብ ኤርትራ ይለኣኸሎም ኣሎ ክብል ንሰማዕቱ ካብታ ናይ ሓሶት ዋህዮ ሕፍስ ኣቢሉ ከይተሰከፈ ክንስንሰሎም ይስማዕ። ነዚ ዘረጋግጽ ዋላ ሓንቲ ጭብጢ ወይ መርትዖ የብሉን። እቶም ሰማዕቱ እውን፣ ሓቅነት ናይቲ ዝብሎ ዘሎ ከረጋግጹ፣ ክንደይ ንወርሒ ወይ ከኣ ኣበየናይ ሃገርን ባንክን እቲ ገንዘብ ክምዝቕበልዎ ንክሓቱ ዘኽእሎም ድፍረት ወይ ትብዓት የብሎምን። ብዝተባህሎም ሓሶት ጥራሕ ሰኒቖም ይኸዱ። ኩነታት ኣንበሳደር ኣድሓኖም ገብረማርያምን መስፍን ሓጎስን ዝፈላሊ ናይ መነባብሮ ፍሉይነት ኣይረኣኹን ። ከም ዝኾነ ኣብ ስደት ዝነብር ኤርትራዊ በቶም ኣብ ዓዲ ዘነበሩ ዘለው ስድራኦምን ቤተ ሰቦምን ከም ዝሻቐሉ እየ ዝፈልጥ። ኣባላት ሰዲህኤ ወልቃዊ ናብራኦም ካብ ሓደ ተራ ኤርትራዊ ሰደተኛ ዝፈለ እንተ ኮይኑ ከኣ ብመርተዖ ክረጋገጽ ይግበኦ። መስፍን ሓጎስ ኣበየናይ ናይ ሓሙሽተ ኮኾብ ሆቴል ክድቅስን ክበልዕን ተራእዩ? ፍሉይ ክዳን ዝኽደን፡ ፍሉይ ሳእኒ ዝረግጾን፣ መኻይን ዝዝውርወን እንተ ዝኸውን መርኣያ ናይ ሕቡእ ገንዘብ ኮይኑ መተወስደ። እዚ ጸለመ’ዚ ብስነ መጎት ክተሰንዮ ዘይከኣልን ሰባት ናይ ዕለታዊ ናብራኦም መብሊዒ ክገብሩዎን ሃየንታ እዩ ።
ሓ/ ፎሮ ኤርትራዊ ሃገራዊ ባይቶ ንደሞክራሲያዊ ለውጢ ብሰንኪ ሰዲህኤ ከምዝፈረሰ ንሰምዓቱ ክምድር እንከሎ፡ ዘቕረቦ ጪብጢ የለን። እቶም ተገዲስና ኩነታት ባይቶ እንከታተል ዜጋታት ግና እቲ ሓቂ ንፈልጦ ኢና። ኪዳን ብሓባራዊ ምርድዳእ (consensus) እምበር፣ ብኣብዝሓ ድምጺ ዝውስን ትካል ኣይነበረን። እንተኾነ ኪዳን ብብዝሒ ድምጺ ካብ ኪዳን ከውጽኡና ወሲኖም እዮም። ኣብ ምምስራት ባይቶ ጠለብ ሰዲህኤ ግዜ ንወስኽ ኣይንትሃወኽ፡ ነቶም ሰነዳትና ከኣ ብግቡእ ነጻፍፎም ዝብል ነበረ። እቶም ኣሰናደውቲ ግና ዝምውሉና እካላት ሕጂ እንተ ዘይተገብረ ኣይንምውልን ስለ ዝበሉና ናይ ግድን ክንገብሮ ኢና ምስ በሉ፡ ኣብቲ መስርሕ ዕግበት ስለ ዘይነበረና ሰዲህኤ ስሒብና። ባይቶ ከኣ ከምቲ ንሕና ዝበልናዮ፡ ብዘይ ጽፉፍ ሰነዳት ስለ እተበገሰ’ዩ ከም ሳዕቤኑ ኣብ መንጎ ፈጻሚ ኣካልን ባይቶን ናይ ስልጣን ምርጋሕ ዝተረኽበ። ብተወሳኺ ኣብ መንጎ ውድብ ኩናማን ኣባላት ባይቶን ብጉዳይ ስውእ ሓምድ እድሪስ ዓዋተ ዝተፈጥረ ዘይመሰረታዊ ፍልልይ ክሳብ ሕጂ ይቕጽል ኣሎ። ነዚ ዝምልከት ሓው ዳኒኤል ተወልደ ሓደ ካብቶም ፍሩያት ተዋሳእቲ ኣብ ባይቶ ዝነበረ ኣብቲ እዋን’ቲ፣ ንሰልፊ ዲሞክራሲ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ፡ ካብ ክልኦት ብዝሰነቖ መሰረት ዘይብሉ ጸለመ ክሳብ ዝኣኽሎ ኣጸሊምዎ እዩ። እንተኾነ ክልተ ዓመት ይገብር፣ ኣብ ቦስቶን ዝገበርናዮ ህዝባዊ ኣኼባ፣ ካልኦት ብዘጋገይዎ የጸልመና ከም ዝነበረ ኣብ ቅድሚ ኣኼባ ይቕሬታ ሓቲቱ እዩ። ስለቲ ምቕልሉነቱ ከኣ የመስግኖ። እዚ ጭቡጥ መርትዖ ናይቲ ባይቶ ኣብ ልዕሊ ስዲህኤ ዝስንዝሮ ዝነበረ ዘይቅቡል ጸለመ ምዃኑ እዩ። ስለዚ ነቲ ሓቂ ክፈልጥ ዝደሊ እቲ ጸገም ባይቶ ባዕሎም ዝፈጠርዎ እምበር ሰዲህኤ ዝፈጠሮ ኣይነበረን ኣይኮነን ። ሰዲህኤ ውድባት ክንጥርንፍ ደኣ ይቃለስ እምበር፡ ውድባት ክፍርስ ዝካየዶ መስርሕ የለን።
ዝኾነ ተጋዳላይ ንህግደፍ ወይ ንኢሳያስ ኣፈወቂ ምእንቲ ኣብ ስልጣን ክንብር፣ ካብ ዝፈትዎም ደቁን ቤተሰቡን ተፈልዩ ኣብ ጽምዋ ስደት ዓመታት ከርተት ክብል እንታይ ረብሓ ስለ ዘለዎ ኮን ይኽውን? እዚ ሕልና ዘለዎ ዜጋ ዝቕበሎ ኣይኮነን። ከምዚ ዓይነት ኣተሓሳስባ ዘለዎም ዜጋታት ጭቡጥ ሓበሬታ ክሳብ ዘየቕረቡ፣ ብተዘዋዋሪ መንገዲ ተሓባበርቲ ናይ ህግደፋዊ ስርዓት ይኾኑ ኣለዉ። ሓቂ ሎሚ እንተ ዘይወጸት ጽባሕ ክትወጽእ እያ ።
ሰልፊ ዲምክራሲ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ፡ ብቕዋሙን መትከላቱን ዝተኣማመን፣ ንነዊሕ ወለዶታት ከገልግል ዝኽእል ሃገራዊ ራኢ ይውንን። እዚ ስለ ዝኾነ “ድሕሪ ህግደፍ ኣብ ኤርትራ ስልጣን ክሕዝ ይኽእል እዩ” ብምባል ስግኣት ዝሓደሮም ወገናት ካብ ምጽላሙ ዓዲ ኣውዕሉን። ሓደ ምሁር ብ2009 ሰዲህኤ ኣብ ኤርትራ ኣብ 2011 ኣብ ዝግበር ምርጫ ክሳተፍ እዩ ክብል መዲሩ ነይሩ። ኩልና ከም እንፈልጦ ሎሚ 2016 ኣብ ምፍጻም ኣሎና። እዚ ምሁር እዚ ነቲ ዝበሎ ክስሕቦን ይቕሬታ ክሓተሉን መተገብአ። እዚ ከምዚ ዝኣመሰለ ብሂላት ካብ ስግኣት ዝተበገሰ፡ ኣብ መንጎ ሰዲህኤን ካልኦት ተቓወምትን ዘይምትእምማንን ጥርጠራን ንምፍጣር ዝተማህዘ እዩ።
ኣብ መደምደምታ፣ ሓቂ ዘይምዝራብ ኣብ ሕብረተሰብኣዊ ባህልና እንተኾነ’ውን ፍቱው ኣይኮነን። ኩሎም ኣብ ምዝርጋሕን ምእካብን ሓበሬታ ዝተዋፈሩ ዜጋታት ሓቅነት ናይ ሓበሬታ ምንጭታቶም ንምርግጋጽ ሓላፍነቶም ምዃኑ ክዝንጉዑ የብሎምን። ሓፋሽ ህዝቢ ሓቀኛን እዋናውን ሓበሬታ ክረክብ መሰሉ ስለ ዝኮነ። እንትኾነ እዚ ኣብ ሓድሓደ መርበባት ሓበሬታ ዝወጽእ መግለጽታት ጸኒሑ ከኣ ሓቅነቱ ዝፈሽል ዘሎ፣ እቲ ጉድለት ክፍተሽን ክምርመርን ኣለዎ። እቶም ወረ ዘቐብሉ ዘለዉ ደገፍቲ ተቓውሞ ተመሲሎም፣ ልኡኻት ህግደፍ ከይኮኑ ምጥንቃቕ የድሊ ኣሎ። ወነንቲ መርበብ ንሓድነትን ምምስራት ዲሞክራሲያዊት ኤርትራን ኣበርክቶ ዘይብሎም ጽሑፋት እንተ ዘየስተናግዱ መተመርጸ ።
ዝኽሪ ንስውኣትና
ክብሮም ግረነት
More...
Presenting Country Reports to Third Committee, Experts Propose Changes to Unjust, Inhumane Practices, as Delegates Question Findings
Written by United NationsNon-compliance on the part of States had hindered the ability of human rights rapporteurs to investigate violations in countries under their purview, the Third Committee (Social, Humanitarian and Cultural) heard today during its first day of interactive dialogue on area-specific situations.
Of the five Special Rapporteurs presenting reports to the Committee, only one, assigned to Myanmar, had been granted access to the territory under her mandate. In the absence of access, the other four — covering human rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Belarus and Eritrea — had gathered information remotely. The cooperation of all States was a fundamental obligation of United Nations membership, two of the experts recalled.
Sheila B. Keetharuth, Member of the Former Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in Eritrea and Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in that country, said there were “reasonable grounds” to believe that its officials had committed crimes against humanity since 1991. The Government had failed to cooperate with the Special Rapporteur and the Commission from the beginning. She encouraged the General Assembly to adopt a resolution submitting the Commission’s report to the Security Council for possible referral of the situation to the International Criminal Court.
In Belarus, there had been no substantial improvements in the human rights situation over the past decade, despite numerous United Nations recommendations, reported Miklós Haraszti, Special Rapporteur on that situation. The “smooth-looking” conduct of recent parliamentary elections should not eclipse the underlying systemic violations, he said. In the Occupied Palestinian Territories, a deepening occupation was stifling the economy and fostering an atmosphere of despair and hopelessness, reported Michael Lynk, Special Rapporteur for the territory.
In the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, there were mixed signs of progress, the Committee heard. Special Rapporteur Tomás Ojea Quintana said political tensions and the prospect of instability continued to impede progress on the human rights agenda. However, there were positive signs, such as a five‑year economic plan to improve living standards and a new strategy to increase life expectancy at birth.
Yanghee Lee, Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in Myanmar, commended the Government for its progress in recent years, while stressing that many human rights challenges remained. In Kachin and Shan states, humanitarian access to conflict areas was the worst it had been in recent years, while in Rakhine state, discriminatory policies and practices continued to deny Muslim communities of their most fundamental rights. “This is not what peace should look like,” she said.
During the discussions, several delegates expressed opposition to the raison d’être of the Special Rapporteurs, arguing that country-specific mandates and resolutions violated the principles of universality, impartiality and non-selectivity. Such interventions used human rights as a pretext to interfere in States’ internal political affairs and were better left to existing mechanisms, such as the Universal Periodic Review of the Human Rights Council, several said.
Making that point, Venezuela’s representative, speaking on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement, said the selective adoption of country-specific resolutions exploited human rights for political purposes and that such matters were better left to existing mechanisms, such as the Universal Periodic Review of the Human Rights Council. Many called instead for engagement in a spirit of cooperation and dialogue. In that spirit, Singapore’s delegate said no draft resolution against Myanmar would be tabled in the Third Committee.
The observer of the State of Palestine spoke in a point of order.
The Third Committee will reconvene at 10 a.m. on Friday, 28 October, to continue its discussion of the promotion of human rights. It is expected to start with an interactive dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in the Palestinian Territories Occupied since 1967.
Background
The Third Committee (Social, Humanitarian and Cultural) met today to continue its discussions on the promotion and protection of human rights. For further information, see Press Release GA/SHC/4172.
Dialogue on Human Rights in Myanmar
YANGHEE LEE, Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in Myanmar, commended the Government for progress it had made in recent years and thanked it for its cooperation throughout her mandate. Hundreds of political prisoners had been released, repressive laws had been rescinded and a major peace conference had been held. Yet, many human rights challenges remained, including the curtailment of the rights to assembly, association and expression. Despite a growing democratic space, she expressed concern about the continuing dominance of the military in politics. It still held 25 per cent of parliamentary seats and controlled several powerful ministries. Without constitutional reform — which would be challenging given that it required military approval — the transition from a military to a fully civilian Government would not be possible.
She also voiced concern that landmines continued to be laid, noting that Myanmar was the third most heavily mined country in the world. In Kachin and Shan states, humanitarian access to conflict areas was the worst it had been at any point in recent years. “This is not what peace should look like,” she said. In Rakhine state, discriminatory local orders, policies and practices continued to deny Muslim communities of their most fundamental rights. Restrictions on freedom of movement had impacted every area of life: access to education, livelihoods and health services. Birth registration had not taken place in conflict-affected areas in several years, placing children at risk of underage recruitment, trafficking and child labour. Ending the institutionalized discrimination of Muslim communities and accountability for alleged systematic human rights violations were urgent priorities.
The representative of Myanmar reiterated his opposition to country specific mandates, as they ran contrary to the principles of non-selectivity and non-politicization. Yet, Myanmar had fully cooperated with the Special Rapporteur and was the only country under the Human Rights Council’s agenda item 4 that had received the Special Rapporteur’s visits. Acknowledging that all the recommendations had been made in good faith, he expressed hope that Myanmar would receive the necessary international support to continue its efforts to promote the fundamental rights of all people and to uphold the rule of law. Describing the country’s progress, he also elaborated on persistent challenges in fostering peace and national reconciliation after decades of internal armed conflict. On the situation in Rakhine state, which had attracted international attention, he said Government actions had been taken in response to a violent armed attack on its security forces. He rejected distorted information reported in the media about the use of excessive force, explaining that security forces had been ordered to use maximum restraint unless confronted by armed resistance.
When the floor opened, several representatives, including those of Japan and Republic of Korea, asked the Special Rapporteur which of her extensive recommendations should be considered priorities. Others, such as the representatives of Eritrea, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, and Cuba, among others, expressed their opposition to country-specific mandates. The United Kingdom’s representative, who noted that “Burma’s” relationship with the United Nations was changing, asked what the Special Rapporteur saw as the optimum level of support to the country’s authorities. Several delegations, including Norway’s representative, asked for reflections on how the international community could help improve the situation in the State of Rakhine.
Ms. LEE, responding, said the new Government had inherited many negative legacies from the military dictatorship, and underlined that the international community must be cognizant of that. Regarding attacks in some states, she said she had advocated for access to many areas but humanitarian access had been blocked. Where non-State media had been allowed some access, they had been prevented from reporting on the situation under the pretext of national security. Turning to the citizenship laws, she said they had to be reviewed, but the Government had not indicated any interest in that. She had raised objections with authorities about outdated and discriminatory laws, which required reform.
Protection of civilians was her major concern, she said, adding that humanitarian access had worsened in several states and that the human rights implications of increased military conflict were of great concern. Clashes had occurred in jade-mining areas, another sign that natural resources and conflict were linked. Opening an office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Myanmar with a full mandate was crucial and had been promised by the previous Government, yet not delivered. The last General Assembly resolution had included some benchmarks for the Government to address the rule of law and other issues. By discontinuing the resolution, she expressed concern that the Third Committee had signalled that Myanmar had met those benchmarks. She said she did not feel they had been met.
Also participating in the interactive dialogue were representatives of the United States, China, Thailand, Australia, Switzerland, Egypt (on behalf of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation), Russian Federation, Czech Republic, Jordan, Singapore, Saudi Arabia, Viet Nam, and Iran, as well as the European Union.
Dialogue on Human Rights in Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
TOMÁS OJEA QUINTANA, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, in his new capacity, said political tensions and the prospect of instability continued to impede progress on the human rights agenda amid reports of two nuclear tests and several missile launches by the Government, as well as increased military readiness among other countries and implementation of Security Council sanctions. As Council measures to deter nuclear proliferation should also protect civilians from the impacts of sanctions, he urged support for national relief efforts in the wake of Typhoon Lionrock, which had affected 140,000 in the country’s northeast. Describing a pattern of civil and political rights violations, he cited severe restrictions on freedom of movement, the conditions and treatment of prisoners and structural deficiencies in the public food distribution system.
He went on to note signs of a positive change in recent social and economic policies, including a five-year economic plan to improve living standards and a new strategy to increase life expectancy at birth. He also welcomed programmes in the health sector developed with the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), noting that all such initiatives should be carefully monitored. He encouraged the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and the international community to explore all venues for cooperation, conscious that a balance must be achieved between “situating” responsibilities for rights violations and engaging with duty bearers. Next month, he would visit Japan and the Republic of Korea, and anticipated future trips to China and the Russian Federation, with the aim of building regional and international platforms for cooperation. He regretted that the representative of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea was not in the room for the interactive dialogue.
When the floor was opened for questions, several countries expressed reservations about the practice of country-specific resolutions, which violated the principles of universality, impartiality and non-selectivity. They said such interventions used human rights as a pretext to interfere in States’ internal political affairs, arguing that such issues were better addressed through the Universal Periodic Review of the Human Rights Council. Many who supported the Special Rapporteur’s mandate wanted to know what more he could do to engage the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and gain access to the country. Several asked what could be done to ensure accountability for human rights violations.
Mr. QUINTANA expressed concern that the divergence of opinion had hindered genuine dialogue on human rights and said the General Assembly should bear the opinions of the Non-Aligned Movement in mind as part of a fruitful dialogue with delegations that supported such resolutions.
To questions about his ability to engage with the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, he acknowledged that engagement would take time, patience and dedication. There were, as several delegates had pointed out, alternative human rights mechanisms. The Universal Periodic Review had made a series of recommendations, which he urged the Government to review. Thematic rapporteurs, such as the Rapporteur on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, could also be used to engage the Government on human rights issues.
To the concern raised by many delegates about accountability, he pointed to a forthcoming report by two independent experts on guidelines for accountability related to human rights. He stressed that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea was not in a period of political transition and thus accountability there should not be dealt with in the same way as it was in transitional justice programmes.
Participating in the interactive dialogue were representatives of Venezuela (also speaking on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement), Syria, Japan, Australia, Lichtenstein, Netherlands, United States, Russian Federation, United Kingdom, Belarus, Switzerland, Czech Republic, China, Republic of Korea, Germany, Cuba, Norway, Maldives, Iran, Ireland, Lao People’s Democratic Republic and Argentina, as well as the European Union.
Human Rights in Belarus
MIKLÓS HARASZTI, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Belarus, discussing his findings, said that while had been only very few positive developments, one of them was the signing of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Much of his report focused on human rights in electoral processes in Belarus, especially parliamentary elections on 11 September 2016, which he said had been held without the violence by law enforcement that had marred previous elections. However, there had been no steps to either change the oppressive legal framework or modify restrictive practices, and the “smooth-looking” conduct of those polls should not eclipse the underlying systemic violations, he said.
The “guided” nature of electing a “token” opposition party member and an independent cultural activist to Parliament had made those choices a selection by the Government, he said. There had been no equal access to the media for the contestants. Neither the voter turnout nor the votes were verifiable, and the Chair of the Central Election Commission had been in place for 20 years. Describing a legal and administrative system of human rights restriction, he said the freedoms of expression and media continued to be violated. Belarus was the only country in Europe that lacked a privately-owned national media. Suppression of the freedoms of association and assembly persisted. Despite recommendations by various United Nations bodies, there had been no substantial changes in the human rights situation in the last decade, he said, urging Belarus to stop its use of the death penalty and engage with the Special Rapporteur.
The representative of Belarus said country-specific discussions could only “rip up controversy” and overburden the international community’s agenda. There was no need or context for such attention and Belarus had constantly conducted a dialogue with the human rights machinery. A national plan on human rights had been put in place based on recommendations from the Universal Periodic Review and treaty bodies, but that information had been distorted in the report. The views of observers had also not been taken into account. “We do not need to be taught how to live,” she said, stressing that after the Second World War and the Chernobyl nuclear accident, Belarus had created a strong State. It would remain a contributor to peace and agreement.
When the floor opened for interaction, a number of representatives, including those of Ecuador and Bangladesh, protested the existence of any country-specific mandates, while delegates of Eritrea, Venezuela and Lao People’s Democratic Republic suggested that the Universal Periodic Review was the correct venue for such discussions. Representatives of Norway, United Kingdom and Germany meanwhile, urged Belarus to place a moratorium on the death penalty as the first step toward abolition. Several others asked about space for civil society in Belarus, with Poland’s representative requesting an update in the context of elections.
Mr. HARASZTI, responding, described steps that could have “miraculous” effects on the human rights situation, such as the repeal of article 193.1 of the penal code, which was the chapter that criminalized all activity not permitted by the State. Under it, the most important human rights organizations had been made de jure criminal in everything they did because they were not registered. To questions on improving elections, he noted that although Belarus had invited observers of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), parliamentary elections had not been complied with and only unimportant procedural recommendations had been heeded. Cooperation with OSCE should go beyond inviting observers into complying with their recommendations.
He expressed agreement with the representatives of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan that dialogue should be the basis for improving human rights, and urged those delegations to believe him and the Human Rights Council that his mandate was about cooperation, not about the other accusations lobbied at him. It would be a very important step forward if Belarus would send him their action plan, he said, adding that he would take it as a good gesture toward cooperation.
Participating in the interactive dialogue were representatives of the United States, Czech Republic, Cuba, Russian Federation, Lithuania, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Switzerland, Iran, Ireland, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, China, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Syria, and Bolivia (also speaking on behalf of Nicaragua), as well as the European Union.
Dialogue on Human Rights in Eritrea
SHEILA B. KEETHARUTH, Member of the Former Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in Eritrea and Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in Eritrea, presented that body’s final report (A/HRC/32/47), which had found reasonable grounds to believe that Eritrean officials had committed crimes against humanity since 1991, including enslavement, imprisonment, enforced disappearances, torture, other inhumane acts, persecution, rape and murder. Eritrea’s military/national service programmes included arbitrary and indefinite detention, often for years. The Commission documented extensive use of arbitrary arrest and detention, and numerous cases of enforced disappearances and rampant torture. There had been no material changes in the situation. The country still had no Constitution or Parliament, and indefinite national service persisted. While Eritrea had refused to allow the Commission to visit and have unhindered access to sites and locations, the Commission had been able to corroborate information provided by witnesses.
Turning to her mandate as Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Eritrea, she stated that the Government had failed to cooperate with the Special Rapporteur and the Commission from the beginning. The Commission had requested that the African Union establish an accountability mechanism to investigate, prosecute, and try individuals believed to have committed crimes against humanity. Additionally, it had recommended that Member States provide Eritrean nationals seeking protection with refugee status. “It is not safe to forcibly return those who have left Eritrea,” she said. She would continue to implement her mandate over the coming months, and expressed hope the General Assembly would adopt a resolution submitting the Commission’s report to the Security Council for a possible referral of the human rights situation in Eritrea to the International Criminal Court.
The representative of Eritrea said he saw little value of entering into dialogue with a biased Special Rapporteur. He preferred an approach marked by dialogue and understanding and which took note of Government achievements. The country mandate was unwarranted for Eritrea and an insult to Africa. The most appropriate venue for such discussions was the Human Rights Council and he rejected a politicized approach. The Government’s priority was to protect its people, live in harmony and build its political system. Political participation, including of women, was high. Eritrea was committed to development. It was an independent and modest regional actor and favoured engagement. Further, national ownership was an undeniable pillar for nation-building. Women’s and children’s rights were protected and remote areas were being developed. He acknowledged that achievements were modest and that Eritrea had a long way to go, but the Government shouldered its international obligations and cooperated with international human rights mechanisms. Yet, it was being treated unfairly, singled out for human rights violations, while those in other countries went unnoticed.
During the ensuing dialogue, delegates raised questions and concerns about ongoing human rights violations, impunity and engagement with the international human rights mechanisms. Several asked about follow-up to issues and recommendations, while others reiterated their opposition to the selective and politicized nature of country mandates, stressing that the Human Rights Council, particularly the Universal Periodic Review, were the most appropriate venues for the promotion and protection of human rights.
The representative of Ethiopia said the mayhem in his country was the result of the deployment of Eritrean terrorists. Eritrea had destabilized the Horn of Africa and committed crimes against humanity. Eritrea was on the Committee’s agenda, he said, not Ethiopia.
Ms. KEETHARUTH reiterated her commitment to “look at all comments” in the implementation of her mandate. She welcomed Eritrea’s engagement with the international community, which should lead to tangible improvements for its citizens, such as improved treatment of detainees. Building trust was required, internally and externally. Regarding forced labour, she said citizens must have a choice as to whether and how they wished to work. Development, while important, did not give license to violate human rights. Any engagement with the United Nations must work towards ending impunity, with human rights violators punished. Engagement with United Nations bodies should not be selective. Access to Eritrea had only been given to the Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights to a model prison and only for 15 minutes. More time was needed for a proper assessment.
Participating in the discussion were representatives of Venezuela (also on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement), Myanmar, Djibouti, United States, Zimbabwe, Germany, United Arab Emirates, Ecuador, Ethiopia, China, Norway, Cuba, Belarus, Bolivia, the United Kingdom, Bangladesh, Switzerland, the Russian Federation, Pakistan, Burundi, Iran and Egypt, as well as the European Union.
Dialogue on Human Rights in Palestinian Territories
MICHAEL LYNK, Special Rapporteur on the Situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, presented his first report to the Committee, which was based on interviews with human rights non-Governmental organizations, Palestinian officials and United Nations officers in Jordan, as he had been unable to travel to the Occupied Palestinian Territories due to Israel’s noncompliance with his mandate and refusal to grant him access to the territories. He also had been unable to meet with activists in the Gaza Strip due to Israel’s restrictions on their movement.
He highlighted three areas of particular concern: violence and lack of accountability, collective punishment and forcible transfers and the right to development. On the first issue, he observed that, too often, Israel used lethal force as a first choice, rather than the last resort. In only the rarest instances did cases brought before Israeli military law enforcement result in indictment. Israel was increasingly using administrative detention and imprisoning Palestinian children. It continued to collectively punish Palestinians, through home demolitions, geographic closures, infringements on freedom of movement and the decade-long blockage of Gaza. Forcible transfers, in the form of repeated demolitions of Arab Bedouin communities, the refusal of housing permits to Palestinians and destruction of humanitarian aid facilities, also violated international law. Finally, the Israeli occupation was a violation of Palestinians’ right to development. “No other society in the world faces such an array of cumulative challenges,” he said, adding, “the result has been a stifled and disfigured Palestinian economy that Israel, the Occupying Power, decisively controls and exploits for its own benefit.”
3,800 'Migrants' Die in the Mediterranean Sea So Far in 2016: How Many of them Eritreans?
Written by EPDP information Office
The UNHCR reported on 26 October that at least 3,800 migrants/refugees died in the Mediterranean Sea so far this year. It said this is the largest figure of deaths counted in one year in the recent sad history of this sea. The figure for the year 2015 was given to have been 3,771 deaths. How many of the Eritreans? No one knows. Migrants reported missing in the past two years were reported to be 3,930. How many of them Eritreans? No count is taken for a fast emptying nation with a government that cares less about the suffering and loss of its own people.
The French newspaper Tribute de Genève reported on Thursday, 27 October, quoting agencies that the rate of death was one out of every 47 persons who tried to cross the Mediterranean from Libya to Europe during the current year. The rate was 1 death out of 88 for the e 330,000 persons who crossed the Mediterranean as a whole This route was described to have been "the deadliest" ever in record.
Some estimates give the figure of up to 30,000 deaths in the sea in recent years while trying to reach the shores of Europe for safety. But even Europe cared less at least until Lampedusa of 3 October 2013 when 368 refugees, almost all save six were Eritreans fleeing from Africa's most repressive regime.
And who will tell even an estimated figure of Eritrean deaths in the Mediterranean Sea at least during the past ten years? No one. The regime in Eritrea, which has been there for 25 years since the country became independent, did not even care to take census of its own population let alone to try to know how many died in the deserts and the high seas.
The last time Eritreans were counted in an official census was in 1931 when they were about 600,000. Today, after 85 long years, the count remains unknown: some estimates put the population at about 3m while UN estimates reach the figure of 6.5m. This is one indicator of the absence of a properly functioning government in that cares to take count of own people.
ኤርትራ ብበበይኑ ናይ ብዙሕነት ሕብሪ ዝወቀበት ናይ ሓባርና ሃገር እያ። ብዙሕነታ፡ ብሃይማኖታዊ እምነት፡ ብብሄራት፡ ብቋንቋ፡ ብጀኦግራፊያዊ ኣቀማምጣን ባህልን ይግለጽ። እዚ ብዙሕነት’ዚ ዝፈጥሮ ኣብ ብዙሕ ተረኽቦታት ዝንጸባረቕ ናይ ሓሳብ ብዙሕነት እውን ኣብ ኤርትራ፡ ነይሩ፡ ኣሎን ክቕጽልን እዩ። ኩሉ እዚ ብዙሕነት ኣብ ክውንነታ ነናቱ እጃም ዘለዎ፡ ኣሳንዩ ክነብር ዝግበኦ እምበር ዝውገድ ኣይኮነን። ገለ ካብዚ ብዙሕነት ከተወግድ ወይ ከተስተናዕቕ ምፍታን ከኣ ንምሉእነት ኤርትራ ኣብ ሓደጋ ዘውድቕ ስለ ዝኾነ፡ ቅቡል ኣይኮነን።
ሰልፊ ደሞክራሲ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ ነዚ ብዙሕነት ተቐቢሉን ኣኽቢሩን “ ናይ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ፡ ሃይማኖታዊ፡ ብሄራዊ፡ ቀቢላዊ፡ ባህላውን ቋንቋውንብዙሕነት ይኣምንን ከም ሃገራዊ ቅሙጥ ጸጋን ሓይልን ይቖጽሮን።” ዝብል መሰረታዊ ሓሳብ ሓደ ካብ ኣገደስቲ ሰነዳቱ እዩ። ነዚ ብዙሕነታዊ ሓሳብን እምንቶን ናይ ምዕቃቡ ግቡእ ከም ዘለዎ ንምዕዛዝ ከኣ “ኤርትራ፡ ሰላምን ሓድነትን ዝሰፈና ሃገር ንኽትከውን፡ ነዚ ናይ ብዙሕነት ባህልን ሓርበኛነትን ጸጋ ብምልላይ ንኤርትራዊ ሃገራዊ ሓድነትን ብዙሕነትን ንምዕቃብ ይጽዕር።” ብዝብል ነዚ ቀዳማይ ሓሳብ የራጉዶ።
እዚ ብግቡእን ሓልዮትን እንተ ተመሓዲሩ መልክዕናን ግርማናን፡ ተዘይተመሓዲሩ ከኣ ክፋእናን ውድቀትናን ዝኸውን ናይ ኣተሓሳስባ ብዙሕነትና ኣብ ብዙሕ መዳያት እዩ ዝንጸባረቕ። ኣብ ኣገላልጻ ፖለቲካዊ መንነት ናይቲ ኣብ ኤርትራ ዘሎ ጨቋኒ ጉጅለ ይንጸባረቕ። “ድሕሪ ውድቀት ጉጅለ ህግደፍ ኤርትራ ብኸመይ’ያ ትመሓደር?” ዝብል ሕቶ ኣብ ምምላስ እውን ይንጸባረቕ። ገሊኦም “ጉጅለ ህግደፍ ናይ ውሱን ሃይማኖታዊ እምነት ወኪል’ዩ” ይብሉ። ገሊኦም ድማ ናይ ውሱን ብሄር ወኪልን ሓላው ረብሓን እዩ” ካብ ምባል ድሕር ኣይብሉን። ገሌና ከኣ “ጉጅለ ህግደፍ ውሱን ጸረ ህዝቢ ባርያትን ጸቢብ ረብሓን ናይ ዘራኽቦም ኣንጻር ህዝቢ ዝጨከኑ፡ ንዝኾነ ኤርትራዊ ሃይማኖትን ብሄርን ዘይውክሉን ዘየኽብሩን ውሑዳት ምትእኽካብ እዩ” ንብል። “ኣብ ኤርትራ ድሕሪ ህግደፍ ሕቶ ደሞክራሲ ብኸመይ ይምለስ?” ንዝብል ሕቶ ዝወሃብ መልሲ እውን በቲ ኣቐዲሙ ዝተጠቕሰ ናይ ሓሳብ ፍልልይ ዝጽለው እዩ።
ገሊኦም ኣብ መጻኢት ኤርትራ ዝምስረት ስርዓት ሃይማኖታዊ ክኸውን ይጽዕቱ። ገሊኦም ድማ የለን ነናይ ብሄርካ መንግስቲ ብምምስራት እባ ክብሉ ይስምዑ። እዚ ጥራይ ዘይኮነ ኣብ ዙርያ እዚ ሸነኻዊ እምነታት ይውደቡን ነቲ ጌጋ ዝብልዎ ናይቲ ጉጅለ ኣካይዳ ይደግምዎን። ገሌና ከኣ ብፍላይ ሰልፊ ደሞክራሲ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ፡ እዞም ክልተ ንብዙሕነታዊ ሓድነትና ዘህስሱ ሓሳባት፡ ካብ ፖለቲካዊ መድረኽ ኤርትራ ናይ ምስራዞም ስልጣንን ሓላፍነትን’ኳ ተዘየብሉ፡ ኣብ ኤርትራ በዞም ዝተጠቕሱ ጫፋት ዘይእለ፡ ደሞክራስያውን ዘይሃይማኖታውን (ሰኩላር) ስርዓት ክምስረት ኣለዎ ኢሉ ይኣምን። ንምዕዋቱ ድማ ይቃለስ። ኣብ ክንዲ “ንገሌና” ንኹልና ዝብል ሓሳብ ንምጐልባት ድማ ከይሰልከየ ይሰርሕ። ካብዚ ንኤርትራዊ ውድዕነት ዘንጸባርቕ እምነቱን መትከሉን ዝነቅል “ሰደህኤ ማእከላዊ እምንቶኡ ዲሞክራስያዊ ምሕደራ ህያው ንምግባር ኣብ ሞንጎ ብሄራትን ሕብረተሰብኣዊ ጉጅለታትን ሰላምን ቅሳነትን ተዋሃሂድካ ናይ ምንባር ባህሊ ከስፍን፣ ነቶም ንኤርትራዊ ሃገርነት፡ ብዙሕነትን ሃገራዊ ልዑላውነትን ዝፈታተኑ ግድላት ብንቕሓት ክብድሆምን ክምክቶምን እዩ፤ .. ሰዲህኤ ሰኩልያር ስርዓተ-መንግስቲ ንምህናጽ ኣብ መንጎ ሃይማኖትን መንግስትን ኢድ ምትአትታው ክህሉ ከም ዘይብሉ ይኣምን። ከም መቐጸልታ ናይዚ ድማ ሰዲህኤ ሓያልን ኣዎንታዊ አምንቶኡን ኣብ ሃይማኖታዊ ናጽነት የረጋግጽን፣ ሃይማኖት ኣብ ዉልቀን ሕብረተሰብን ዘለዎ ክብርን ጽልዋን ድማ ይፈልጥን የኽብርን።” ዝብል መትከል ቀንዲ ኣካል መሰረታዊ ሰነዳቱ እዩ።
እቶም ኣብ ትሕቲ ዝተፈላለዩ ኣተሓሳስባታት ዝተወደብና ተቓወምቲ ውድባት ነዚ ካብ ብዙሕነትና ዝምንጩ ናይ ሓሳብ ፍልልያት ከነከኣእሎ እምበር ከነወጋግዶ ኣይንኽእል ኢና። ነዚ ፍልልያት ኣሳንዩ፡ ንዘድልዮ ዓቂቡ ንዘየድልዮ ገሊፉ ናይ መወዳእታ መልክዑ ከትሕዞ ዝኽእል ህዝቢ ኤርትራ፡ ዝመሓደረሉ ቅዋም ከጽድቕ ኣብ ዝኽእለሉ መድረኽ ምስ ደየበ ጥራይ እዩ። ሽዑ እዩ እቲ ህዝቢ ዝድግፎ ኣተሓሳስባ ኣካል ቅዋም ኮይኑ ዝትግበርን ኩልና ክንቅየደሉ እንግደድን። እቲ ተቐባልነት ዘይረኸበ ኣተሓሳስባ ከኣ ንክስማዕ ዕድል ይረክብ። እዚ ዝትግበር ኣምበኣር እቶም ሕጂ ኣብ ህዝባዊ ዳኛ ዘየብሉ ሜዳ “ናተይባ ይበልጽን ይሓይሽን” ንበሃሃል ዘለና ውድባት ነንኣምነሉ ኣተሓሳስባ ሒዝና ኣብ ቅድሚ ህዝቢ ሕጋዊ፡ ኣሳታፊ፡ ሰላማውን ደሞክራስያውን ውድድር ነካይደሉ መድረኽ ምስ ጣጥሐ እዩ።
ብእምንቶይ እቲ ጉጅለ ህግደፍ ኣሊኻ ናብቲም ምስ ህዝብና ዘረኽብ መድረኽ ዘብጽሕ ኩልና እንጐዓዘሉ መንገዲ ናይ ሓባር ጐደና እዩ። እዚ መንገዲ እዚ፡ ናይ ድሕሪ ህግደፍ ፖለቲካዊ እምነቶም ትሕዝቶ ብዘየገድስ፡ ንኹሎም ኣብ ለውጢ ረብሓ ዘለዎምን ንምትግባሩ ዝቃለሱን ወገናት ናይ ሓባሮም እዩ። ዋላ ሓደ ኣካል “እዚ መንገዲ ናይ ከምዚ ፖለቲካዊ እምነት ዘለዎም ጥራይ እዩ” ኢሉ ነቲ ካልእ ከግልል ስልጣን የብሉን። ንረብሓኡ’ውን ኣይኮነን። ናይ ለውጢ ሓይሊ ኣብ ክንዲ ዘተርንዕ ዘዳኽም ስለ ዝኾነ። ሎሚ ክትስጉም እንከለኻ ብዛዕባ ጽባሕ ምሕሳብ’ኳ ሕማቕ ተዘይኮነ፡ ናይ ጽባሕ ትጽቢትካ፡ ንናይ ሎሚ ስጉምትኻ ዘዕንቅፍ ከይከውን ምጥንቃቕ ግና የድሊ። ናይ ሎሚ ውሕልነትካ ንናይ ጽባሕ ተዓዋትነትካ ዝውስን ስለ ዝኾነ። “እንተ ክንብርኩት ዘይክንብርኩት ኣብ ማይ ንብጻሕ” ዝብል ብሂል ዘይምርሳዕ። ጽባሕ ኣብ ዝግበር ናይ ፖሊሲ ውድድር ከይበልጸኒ ኢልካ፡ ከሎ ጌና ሎሚ ተዘየርሓቕኩዎ ምባል ነቲ ካብ ሎሚ ናብ ጽባሕ ዘብጽሕ ናይ ሓባር ዓቕሚ ምድኻም ከም ዘስዕብ ምስትብሃል የድሊ። ከምዚ ዓይነት ልቦና እንተልዩ ጥራይ እያ እምበኣር ናይ ጽባሕ ኤርትራ ናይ ግሌና ዘይኮነትስ ናይ ኩልና እትኸውን።
ሎሚ 27 ጥቅምቲ 2016 ኣብ ከተማ ኒው ዮርክ ሕቡራት መንግስታት ኣመሪካ: ጸረ ዲክታቶርያዊ ስርዓት ኤርትራ ዝተኻየደ ሰላማዊ ሰልፊ ብዓወት ከም እተዛዘመ ተሓቤሩ።
እቲ ሰላማዊ ሰልፊ ካብ ከተማታት ኣመሪካን ካናዳን ከምኡ'ውን ካብ ኤውሮጳ ዝመጹ ደለይቲ ፍትሒ ተሳቲፎምዎ።
ጨናፍር ሰልፊ ዲሞክራሲ ህዝቤ ኤርትራ ኣብ ሰሜን አመሪካ (EPDP NA) ብወከልተን ክሳተፋ እንከለዋ፡ ኣባል ፈጻሚ ሽማግለ ሓው ኣለም ዮውሃንስን፡ ካልኦት ኣባላት ማእከላይ ባይቶ ሰልፍን፡ ኣባላት መሪሕነት ሽማግለ ዞባ ሰሜን ኣመሪካን ኣብቲ ሰላማዊ ስለፊ ተሳቲፎም።
ስላማዊ ሰልፊ ኣብ ምዝዛሙ ድማ፡ ብህያው ቲቪ ዝተመሓላለፈ ህዝባዊ ሰሚናር ተኻይዱ። እዚ ሰላማዊ ሰልፊ’ዚ ከምቲ ናይ ጀነብ ንዲክታቶርያዊ ስርዓት ኤርትራ ዳግማይ ጽፍዒት ዝሃበ ተረኽቦ ምንባሩን፡ ህዝብና መሰላቱ ንምምንዛዕ ዘኽእሎ ባይታ ዝመድመደ ምዃኑን ዝምስከረሉ እዩ።
ኣተሓሒዝና ኣብ ጥብቆ ዘሎ ስእላዊ መግለጺ ነቕርብ።
