February 9, 2020 News

The death is reported of Shewit Yacob, son of fighters and disabled veterans, killed on 04 February 2020 in the centre of Mendefera.

Screenshot 2020-02-09 at 10.46.08

This was in accordance with President Isaias’s ‘shoot to kill’ policy.

This happened in the very area where the EU road project is taking place, using national service conscripts trapped in slave labour.

Screenshot 2020-02-09 at 10.46.23

ወዲ ስውእ ተጋዳላይን ስንክልቲ ተጋዳሊትን ዝኾነ መንእሰይ ሸዊት ያቆብ በቲ ተኩስካ ቅተል ዝብል መምርሒ ኢሳያስ ኣፈወርቂ ኣብ ማእከል ከተማ መንደፈራ ብዕለት 4 ለካቲት 2020 ብግፍዒ ተረሺኑ

መንእሰይ ሽዊት ያቆብ ብዕለት 25 ግንቦት 1993፥ ካብ ኣብኡ ስውእ ተጋዳላይ ያቆብ ገብረትንሳኤን ካብ ኣዲኡ ስንክልቲ ተጋዳሊት ጸጋ ገብረሂወት ተወልደ።

ዕድሚኡ ንትምህርቲ ምስ ኣኸለ ናይ መባእታ ትምህርቲ ኣብ ከተማ መንደፈራ ጀሚሩ፥ ናይ ካልኣይ ደረጃ ትምህርቱ ድማ ኣብ ቤት ትምህርቲ ሳንጆርጆ ዓዲ ወግሪ ስጋዕ 11 ክፍሊ ተማሂሩ ናይ 12 ክልተ ደረጃ ትምህርቱ ንምውዳእ ብ2011/2012 ዓመተ ትምህርቲ ኣብ መበል 25 ዙርያ ንሳዋ ወረደ።

ኣብኡ ናይ 12 ክፍሊ ደረጃ ትምህርትን ወታደራዊ ስልጠናን ብምጥቕላል፥ ናብ ላዕለዋይ ደረጃ ከሕልፍ ዘኽእል ነጥቢ ስለዘይረኸበ፥ ናይ ሃገራዊ ኣገልግሎት፥ ኣባል ሓይሊ ባሕሪ ኮይኑ፥ ናብቲ ኣብ ዓሰብ ዝርከብ ጨንፈር ሓይሊ ባሕሪ ተመዲቡ ኔሩ።

ኣብቲ ዝተመደበሉ ንገለ ዓመታት ከገልግል ድሕሪ ምጽናሕ ንስንክልቲ ኣዲኡን ንምንኣስ ሓውን ንምርኣይ ናብ መንደፈራ ንዕረፍቲ መጸ። እንተኾነ ህሉው ኩነታት መነባብሮ ናይ ስድርኡ ኣዝዩ ስለዘሻቐሎን ስለዘጨነቆን ብዓቕሙ ክገብሮ ዝኽእል ንኽገብር፥ እቲ ዝነበሮ ብጊዜ ደረት ዘይብሉ ኣገልግሎት ራሕሪሑ፥ ስድራቤቱ ክናብይ ወሰነ።

ከም ውጽኢቱ ድማ፥ ኣብ እንዳ ፋጉሮ ምዓልታዊ ስራሕ እንዳሰርሕ ብዝረኽቦ ኣታዊ ንስድራ ቤቱ ክናብይ ጸኒሑ። ብዕለት 4 ለካቲት 2020፥ ሸዊት ከም ኩለን ዝሓለፍ ምዓልታት ንጉሆ ተሲኡ ናብ ስርሑ ወፈረ። ናይ ስራሕ ሰዓታት ኣኺሉ ምስተፈደሰ ድማ፥ ገዛ ቅድሚ ምእታው ምስ ገለ መሳትኡን የዕርኹቱን፥ ኣብ ውሽጢ መንደፈራ ኣብ እትርከብ ሓንቲ ቤት ሻሂ ንሓዳር ጊዜ ድሕሪ ምጽናሕ፥ ካብታ ቤት ሻሂ ምስ የዕሩኽቱ ከወጽእ ከሎ ምስቶም ኣብቲ ከተማ መንእሰያት ክገፍ ላዕልን ታሕትን ክብሉ ዘምሰዩ፥ ኣባላት ምክልኻል ስለዝተራኸበ፥ ብኡ ንቡኡ ምስ ዓርኩ ተታሒዙ፥ ኣብ ኣእዳዎም ፌሮ የእትዮም እንዳኸብከቡዎም ከለው፥ መንእሰይ ሸዊት ምስ ዓርኩ ክሃድሙ ፈቲኖም ካብቶም ሓለውቶም ብዝተተኮሰ ጥይት ልክዕ ስዓት ትሽዓተ ናይ ምሽት ህይወት መንእሰይ ሸዊት ሓለፈት።

መንእሰይ ሽዊት ክሳብ እቲ ኣገልግሎት ጠንጢኑ ስድራቤት ክናብይ ዝጀመረሉ ስዓት ንሃገሩ ብቅንዕናን ብተኣማንነትን ኣገልጊሉ እዩ። ብጀካ እዚ ካብ ክልተ ተጋደልቲ ኣቦን ኣደን ዝተወልደ ኤርትራዊ መንእሰይ እዩ።

መንእሰይ ሽዊት ስነስርዓት ቀብሩ ብዕለት 6 ለካቲት 2020፥ ፍርቂ ምዓልቲ ሓመድ ለቢሱ።

እዚ ጨካን ስርዓት ብተመልከተለይ ናይ ንጹሃት ዜጋታት ክቡር ህይወት ክቐዝፍ ካብ ዝጀምር ብዙሕ ዓመት ኮይኑ እዩ። ብኸምዚ ዝዓይነቱ ዘይሓላፍነታዊ ተግባር ናይ ዝጥፍእ ህይወታት ኤርትራውያን ንሂወት መንእሰይ ሸዊት ወሲካ ቁጽሩ ውሑድ ክኸውን ከምዘይክእል ፍሉጥ እዩ።

ሕልፈት መንእሰይ ሸዊት ኣብ ማእከል ከተማ ኣብ ቅድሚ ህዝቢ ስለዝኾነ ድኣ እዩ ክፍለጥ ክኢሉ እንበር፥ ኣብ ኩለን ዶባት ሃገርና በዚ ከርፋሕ መነባብሮ ናይዚ ስርዓት፥ እሱ ደስዓቦ ግዱድ ባርነት ኣንጸርጺሮም እግሮም ናብ ዝመርሖም ካብ ዝፈትውዎም ስድርኦምን ሃገሮምን ሃጽ ኢሎም ክጠፍኡ እናፈተኑ በዚ ተኩስካ ቅተል ዝብል ኣረሜናዊ ፖሊስ ናይዚ ስርዓት ኣብ ዶባት ብተመልከተለይ ዝትቐዝፈን ሬስኦም ሓመድ ከይለበሰ ቀለብ ኣራዊት ዝኾኑ ዕሸላት መንእሰያት ኣዲኦም ትቑጸሮም።

እግዚኣብሄር ንመንእሰይ ሽዊት ያቆብን ንኹሎም ብተመሳሳሊ መገዲ ህይወቶም ዝሓለፍ ኤርትራውያን ኣምላኽ ኣብ ገነቱ ይቀበሎም።

ንስድራቤት መዋቲ ድማ ጽንዓት ይሃቦም!

ፍትሒ ንዝተበደሉ፥ ጉቡእ መቕጻእቲ ድማ ንበደልቲ ስጋዕ ዝረጋገጽ፥ ቃልስና ክቕጽል እዩ።

ኤልሳ ጭሩም
8 ለካቲት 2020

Summary by Makeda Saba

President-Isaias-Afwerki-Interview-2

 Yesterday (07.02.2020) EriTV broadcast an interview with President Isaias (Eritrean President Isaias Afwerki Interview Part 1 (February 7, 2020) | EastAFRO.com) .  According to East.Afro.com– this is part 1 and part 2 is expected to be broadcast Sunday 09.02.2020.

In line with the style that President Isaias has established for himself this is not an interview it is more like a 2.5-hour lecture that the 2 reporters are required to listen to sitting ramrod straight.

The interview is noteworthy for what is does NOT cover in 2.5 hours:

Political Reform in Eritrea:

o   Constitution implementation

o   Recall of the National Assembly

o   Demobilisation Strategy

o   End of Grade 12 in Sawa

o   Release of political prisoners, prisoners of conscience

o   The role of Abraham Afwerki in the Government of Eritrea

o   Presence of UAE and Saudi military bases in Assab

Economic Reform in Eritrea:

o   Strategy for independent small business

o   Youth employment (free from National Service)

o   Food security – the high level of malnutrition of Eritrean children

o   Financial Reforms

o   Etc.

Progress on Ethiopia Eritrea peace process and specifically:

o   The Economic and Security arrangement –

o   Ethiopia access to Massawa and Assab

o   Road connection with Ethiopia

o   Etc…

President Isaias interview is focused on:

o Ethiopia

o UNHCR continued  facilitation of Eritrean Refugees

o How South Sudan should never have separated from Sudan

o Sudan

Ethiopia

According to President Isaias:

There never was a border dispute with Ethiopia, the war was orchestrated by TPLF Junta, bolstered up by External Henchmen to further their agenda. “ (https://twitter.com/samueltukue/status/1225924576661602304?s=20 )

“…. The main spoiler in Ethiopia is still the TPLF Gang. Ethiopians need to make the right choice. Thinking they can change the mindset of the TPLF is futile. They particularly need to be aware of the motives of outsiders.” (https://twitter.com/samueltukue/status/1225926539537256449?s=20 ) In this case I note that he is not considering Eritrea or the Eritrean Government as one of the interfering  ‘outsiders’ that Ethiopia  has to be aware of.

“…. TPLF, even as it finds itself immersed in total bankruptcy, has and continues to engage in an act of an all-out destructiveness. This should not derail Eritrea and Ethiopia from the path of peace, solidarity and prosperity.” (https://twitter.com/samueltukue/status/1225935090267643906?s=20 )

The President refers to the Ethnic Federalism in Ethiopia as led by a narrow group (i.e. TPFL) as bankrupt and in need of reform he states: “We call it game over, and the Ethiopians have said enough.” He refers to the TPLF as the impediment   finalising the issue of the Bademe border. He is of the view that the TPLF continues to be threat for Eritrea, it is working to divide Eritrean along ethnic lines and it continues to build refugee camps for Eritrean, and to collaborate with UNHCR to entice Eritrean youth out of the country, contributing to the brain drain of the country. He accuses the TPLF for the continued failure to finalise the issue of Bademe.

In a report – Eritrea: National Service, exit and entry (https://drc.ngo/media/5624986/country_report_eritrea_2020.pdf) -   reports that  according to their  sources the Eritrean Government  considers the:

Other sources suggest that the Eritrean government is reluctant to demobilise conscripts from national service because of external concerns. These concerns are related to the Tigray region in Ethiopia and the Muslim Brotherhood in Sudan. According to five Western Diplomats, it is a concert for the Eritrean leadership how the ruling party in the Tigray regional state, TPLF will react to the new situation following peace agreement. TPLF is perceived to be a state within the state and will not necessarily follow the federal government of Ethiopia.”

IGAD and Regional influence

Following  recent meeting between PM Abiy, President of Somalia Foramajo and President Isaias the three leaders agreed to work towards  regional integration a Horn of Africa coalition  referred to as a ‘Cushitic Alliance ‘ (https://www.theeastafrican.co.ke/news/africa/Eritrean-president-floats-regional-bloc-idea---/4552902-5441802-12c3n3z/index.html)  .

According to the Garowe ONLINE editorial (https://www.theeastafrican.co.ke/news/africa/Eritrean-president-floats-regional-bloc-idea---/4552902-5441802-12c3n3z/index.html) the three leaders indicated that they  may invite other partners to the Alliance  and though these were not names it is likely : “…..[these] will come from the neighbourhood , meaning Djibouti, Sudan, South Sudan …… [or] even countries from  across the Arabian Peninsula.”

Such a coalition would overlap extensively with the role presently exercised by IGAD an institution that President Isaias want to replace and which, in his interview, he refers to as a: “. puppet organisation …. remotely controlled by global powers…

Summary

During the interview President Isaias explains that given the ethnic divisions and conflict in Ethiopia, it is not possible for Eritrea to stand by and do nothing.

February 7, 2020 News

Screenshot 2020-02-07 at 12.26.43

Source: UNICEF Report

Eritrea drought, malnutrition and choleraThis is truly shocking.

UNICEF has classified over 60% of Eritrean children under 5 as being “stunted, wasted or underweight.” To put it bluntly – they are close to starvation.

  • Worse than children in Zimbabwe, where half the population are going hungry.
  • Worse than South Sudan, where children are suffering from years of civil war, and just one MSF hospital received 1,000 malnourished children in 2019.
  • Worse than Mozambique, struggling to recover from hurricanes and conflict.

Any self-respecting government would resign if UNICEF produced a report showing this level of suffering.

But President Isaias Afwerki does nothing: all is well. Just keep quiet about the reality of childhood malnutrition.

February 6, 2020 News

In an under-reported visit, Prime Minister Netanyahu has been in Sudan and Uganda, mending fences and possibly preparing the ground for expelling African asylum seekers now living in Israel.

This is the view of Ha’aretz, which wrote this story: “Warming Israeli-Sudanese Relations Worry Asylum Seekers Waiting for Refugee Status. Netanyahu’s comments have shaken up community of 6,000 Sudanese in Israel, fearing their lives could be upended.”

Eritreans may also face deportation to either Sudan or Uganda.


Source: Al-Monitor

Netanyahu’s Africa blitz: photo-ops and pleasing the US

ARTICLE SUMMARY
Israeli diplomats fear that the drive for cooperation projects with African countries is being replaced by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s desire for photo-ops and by hints that relations with Jerusalem would open the door to Washington.

Sudan reported Feb. 2 that Washington had invited head of its Sovereign Council Gen. Abdel Fattah al-Burhan for a visit. The following day, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visited Uganda, secretly meeting there with Burhan. After the meeting, Netanyahu announced proudly to the world that Israel and Sudan, two enemy countries, agreed to work together toward normalizing ties. A statement issued by Netanyahu’s office noted that the prime minister believed the current Sudanese regime is headed in a new positive direction, and that he had also expressed this view to US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. “Burhan is eager to help his country modernize by taking it out of isolation and putting it on the world’s map,” the statement read.

Indeed, Netanyahu’s diplomatic blitz was applauded not just in Jerusalem, but also in Washington. Pompeo praised both countries, congratulating Burhan on “his leadership in normalizing ties with Israel.” In Sudan, on the other hand, things looked a bit different, with the government cautiously noting that Burhan informed no one and consulted no one before taking off to Uganda. Clearly, the road to normalizing ties between Khartoum and Jerusalem is not going to be as smooth as presented by Netanyahu in Kampala.

Israel and Sudan have a turbulent past, with two issues at the crux of animosity: Iran and the conflict with the Palestinians. Back in January 2009, mysterious fighter jets attacked an Iranian arms convoy in the Sudanese desert. In April that year, an Iranian vessel laden with arms bound for the Gaza Strip was torpedoed off the coast of Sudan. Khartoum suspected that Israel was behind the attacks, in an attempt to thwart arms smuggling into Gaza. The toppling of Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir in April 2019 changed the country’s priorities, with its new leaders distancing themselves from Tehran. But what exactly do the current leaders in Khartoum expect from Israel?

Over the past decade, Netanyahu has invested much efforts in cultivating Israeli ties with African states, or in his own words, “bringing Israel back to Africa.” He had stated on numerous occasions that Africa is part of Israel’s list of diplomatic priorities. Netanyahu made no secret of the fact that he was hoping to change the balance of power within the United Nations through this African campaign. He argued that Israel needs the African countries on its side in its UN battles against the Palestinians. Still, he kept noting that his African efforts embodied Israel’s long-term vision of showcasing its commitment to share with others its best practices and technologies in fields that include smart agriculture, water management, high-tech and health innovation.


Bribes, Bombs and Saudi Billionaires: The Secret History of Israel’s Explosive Relations With Sudan

Source: Ha’aretz

Netanyahu wants Sudan to join the ‘friends of Israel’ club of Sunni Arab states. The Mossad, with Saudi help, has tried that before

Yossi Melman

Feb 05, 2020 3:51 PM

The meeting Monday in Uganda between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, head of Sudan’s transitional Sovereignty Council, is just another chapter in the convoluted history of the two countries. It is a story of ups and downs, war, expedience, animosity, gun-running and people-smuggling, conspiracies, the long reach of Iran, clandestine bank transfers and – above all – a relationship wrapped in overlapping layers of secrecy.

The opening chapter in that history was written in the first half of the 1950’s. Sudan was negotiating its independence from the joint British and Egyptian government, known as the “condominium,” which had ruled since 1899.

Sudan’s major opposition, the Umma party, feared that Egyptian president Gamal Abdul Nasser, keep to concretize his ideology of pan-Arabism ideology, and his ambitions for leadership of Africa and the Arab world, would try to bloc Sudan’s independence, in coordination with those Sudanese nationalists who favored unification with Egypt.

Umma’s representatives, led by Sadiq al-Mahdi – who, 30 years later would become Sudan’s prime minister – met secretly in London with Israeli diplomats, among them Mordechai Gazit, then the first secretary of the London embassy. The Sudanese emissaries sought the diplomatic and, if possible, economic assistance of Israel, a sworn enemy of Egypt.

In January 1956, Sudan gained its independence and was recognized by both the UK and Egypt. The task of maintaining the clandestine encounters with Israel, which continued for a few years, was transferred from Israel’s Foreign Ministry to the Mossad.

From the beginning, Sudanese-born Nissim Gaon, an Israeli-Swiss international businessman, played an important role in facilitating relations between Israel and Sudan, with an emphasis on economic ties. Over the years Israel benefited from Gaon’s investments and experience in the tourism and hotel industries.

The honeymoon in the relations between the two countries was cut short at the end of the 1950’s. A military coup d’état – one of several to come – and Nasser’s beguiling spell turned Sudan into Israel’s adversary. Sudan even sent a small military contingent to assist Egypt in the Six Day War of June 1967, and for the next decade there were no bilateral encounters, not even clandestine ones.

With this reality in mind, Israel replayed the old dictum of my enemy’s enemy is my friend, and set to work to build secret ties with forces in opposition to the Sudanese government. Mossad operatives, led by David Ben Uziel, better known as “Tarzan,” infiltrated Sudan in 1969. Their mission was to help the South Sudanese tribes fighting against the central government in Khartoum.

Using air strips and bases in Uganda and Kenya, Israeli air force pilots dropped ammunition and weapons to assist the rebel forces of General Joseph Lago, who also traveled to Israel and met with Prime Minister Golda Meir. On the ground, “Tarzan” and his team, together with Lago’s troops, walked hundreds of kilometers in the bush, bombing bridges on the Nile and ambushing Sudanese soldiers.

The civil war ended in the mid 1970’s – but it wasn’t the end of Israel’s involvement. Instructed by Prime Minister Menachem Begin, Mossad and Israeli navy personnel smuggled Ethiopian Jews to Promised Land, using that accumulated knowledge and experience of the terrain. Risking their lives and working alongside with Israelis of Ethiopian origins, they devised a highly daring plan, which eventually had two phases.

The first, between 1977 and 1980 and codenamed “Operation Brothers,” used Israeli boats to rescue Ethiopian Jews picked up from Sudan’s Red Sea coast. To enhance the operation, the Mossad registered a front company in Europeand rebuilt a defunct diving resort. With Mossad operatives masquerading as diving instructors, the resort served as a command and control center. In this way 17,500 Jews were brought to Israel – yet it was achieved at a slow pace, and it could not be scaled up.

So in 1981, Defense Minister Ariel Sharon met secretly in Kenya with Sudanese leader General Jaffar al-Numeiri. Sharon, with the help of Israeli businessman Yaacov Nimrodi, former Mossad operative Dave Kimchi, and Saudi billionaire Adnan Khashoggi (acting quasi-independently of the Saudi authorities), plotted to turn Sudan into a depot for weapons intended for use to overthrow Ayatollah Khomeini’s relatively young regime in Iran.

The scheme called for Israel to send weapons to Sudan, financed by Khashoggi (both Khashoggi and Nimrodi foresaw tidy commissions.) Numeiri would receive a generous payoff. The deposed Shah’s son would be installed as Iran’s new ruler. Another goal was to divert some of the weapons to foment a rebellion in Chad, and country that could boast uranium mines of strategic interest, that would result in an Israel-friendly government.

But Sharon and his plotters were conspiring behind the back of the Mossad. When Mossad chiefs Yitzhak Hofi and Nahum Admoni learnt about the plan, they first complained to Begin and then they killed it.

Three years later, in 1984, the Mossad proved its strength once again. It decided to adapt once again the modus operandi for the emigration of the Ethiopian Jews. Thanks to bribes given to both Sudanese leader General Jaafar al-Numeiri and Omar Abu Taib, his security agency head, they agreed to turn a blind eye. Those 30 million dollars – donated by the American Joint Distribution Committee, the largest global Jewish welfare organization – lubricated the establishment of a new stage in smuggling out Ethiopia’s Jews.

The Ethiopian Jews were taken at night to Khartoum airport, and flown by “Trans European Airways” to Israel via Brussels. The company was owned by George Gutelman, a Belgium Jew who was more than happy to help the Mossad. Ephraim Halevy, later Mossad head, was in charge: It was called “Operation Moses.” Ironically the main business of Gutelman’s airline – a charter company offering low-cost flights -was to ferry Muslim pilgrims to Mecca.

In executing Operation Moses, the Mossad was assisted by the CIA. This way an additional 30,000 Ethiopian Jews were brought to Israel. But the airlift played a part of the downfall of the Numeiri regime, which was accused of collaborating with Israel. For a short time, Numeiri was replaced by Israel’s old friend, Sadiq al-Mahdi.

Soon, another military coup d’état took place in Khartoum and brought General Omar al-Bashir to power in 1989. Deeply influenced by a charismatic Muslim cleric called Hassan Tourabi, the duo controlled Sudan and turned it into a military theocracy. Osama bin Laden found sanctuary in Sudan from 1990 to 1996. And Sudan formed strong ties with Iran.

The result was that Sudan allowed its territory to be used as a transit point and storage facility for weapons smuggled by Iran’s Qods Force to Hamas in Gaza.

Israel couldn’t watch from the sidelines. From 2009 onward the Mossad – providing information – and Israel’s air force retaliated with a series of air strikes against boats and trucks carrying Iranian weapons and on arms depots on Sudanese soil.

In the last decade, the Sudan-Israel rollercoaster has turned and twisted on. General Bashir was declared a war criminal by the International Criminal Court for his part in perpetrating genocide in the Darfur region and in south Sudan. Sudanese refuges escaping the atrocities hoped to find shelter in Israel; treated as asylum-seekers in only the most formalistic manner, almost none were recognized as refugees, and now Netanyahu and his rightwing cabinet hope the conditions are right to deport them.

South Sudan, which suffered so much, declared its independence, and promptly began to purchase weapons from Israel – and in another historical irony, it, too, embarked on a civil war and perpetrated its own atrocities.

And General al-Bashir’s attraction to Iran waned, and with it, sprung the seeds of a renewed relationship with Israel. Bashir betrayed Iran, and befriended Saudi Arabia, solidifying his reorientation by sending Sudanese troops to fight in the civil war in Yemen – which partly functions as a proxy war between Iran and Saudi Arabia – in return for Saudi money and oil.

Encouraged by the last five years of Saudi Arabia’s burgeoning openness towards the Jewish state, Bashir started to flirt with Israel. He had deeply expedient reasons: he hoped that Netanyahu and the Mossad would be able to leverage the political clout of AIPAC and U.S. Jewish organizations to cleanse him of his crimes, to rehabilitate his reputation, in return for forming diplomatic relations with Israel.

According to foreign reports, in the twilight years of al-Bashir’s rule, Mossad chief Yossi Cohen met with his Sudanese counterpart General Salah Goshfor initial discussions on some form of trade and diplomatic relations between the two countries.

But Sudan’s domestic unrest and a long-pent up wave of opposition to his rule stood in his way. By then, the Mossad knew he was a dead horse, and his days in power numbered. He was finally deposed in April, 2019.

Now, with al-Bashir gone, the conditions could be ripe for a renaissance of relations between Jerusalem and Khartoum. With a tail wind from U.S. President Donald Trump and various Gulf states, Netanyahu’s government has quietly but eagerly renewed its efforts to turn Sudan into another regional Sunni Arab state friendly to Israel. For the time being, Israel’s immediate request is small, and mundane: to allow Israeli planes to over fly over Sudan’s airspace.

It won’t be an easy ride: Sudan’s political opposition challenged al- Burhan’s stance the moment news of his meeting leaked out; they accused him of cooperating with the “enemy,” while the country’s civilian leadership claimed that they had not been notified about the meeting in advance at all. Al-Burhan deflected the criticism with the all-purpose reasoning that he met with Netanyahu for the benefit and welfare of the Sudanese people – emphasizing that the détente does not diminish his support for the Palestinians.

Netanyahu’s immediate political concern was to grab headlines to enhance his pre-election prestige. Indeed, former defense minister Moshe Ya’alon, a leader of the anti-Netanyahu opposition, argued that Israel’s national interests would have been better served by keeping the meeting secret and not publicizing it for short-term domestic political gains.

Clearly the bigger prize would be to open formal trade and diplomatic ties. It is certainly still a defense and security win that the leader of a state as overtly hostile as Sudan was, only a few years ago, has divested from Iran and Hamas, and is interested, however cautiously,in accommodation with Israel.

Netanyahu likes to say it’s another clear sign of how the Middle East’s geopolitics are changing. The jagged and inconsistent history of relations between Israel and Sudan suggests this particular change might not be so smooth, or sustained.

January 29, 2020 News

Source: Businessweek

The United Kingdom and Somaliland are seeking ways with which they can partner to improve security in the Horn by building the capacity of the defence forces.
AFRICA INDUSTRY

UK Seeking Working Relationship With Somaliland On Military Matters

The United Kingdom and Somaliland are seeking ways with which they can partner to improve security in the Horn by building the capacity of the defence forces.

The newly appointed defence attaché at the United Kingdom Embassy for Somalia/Somaliland, Lt Col Huan Davies has been in Somaliland where he held talks with high ranking military personnel of the country and officials of the ministry of defence.

Lieutenant-Colonel Davies met with the Somaliland Defense Minister, Abdiqani Mohamoud Atteeye, and the Army Chief of Staff, Major-General Nouh Tani, with whom he discussed defence matters of mutual concern and the strengthening of ties between the two sides besides an update of progress on programmes implemented.

On the other hand, The Somaliland officials have appreciated UKAID support for defence sector delivered by Axiom and the UK office in Hargeisa.

Axiom International is implementing a capacity building programme in Somaliland on behalf of the UK Government. Ultimately the objective is to increase stability and security in Somaliland.

Sources close to the deliberation stated that the Attaché is following up on several security-related projects the United Kingdom partners with national agencies and security branches which cover defence issues, training, capacity-building, provision of basic supplies indispensable to peace and stability and the rule of law.

Somaliland which remains internationally unrecognized has an army which has played a vital role in the security of the horn of Africa which previously was a hub of pirates.

Somaliland has severally expressed an interest in hosting British and Russian naval bases, which would add to an already active military presence along the coast of the Red Sea – one of the world’s busiest and most strategically important maritime passages.

Last January, the then British Defense Secretary Gavin Williamson paid an unannounced visit to Somaliland and met with President Muse Bihi Abdi, Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Yasin Hagi Mohamoud, and Defense Minister Essa Ahmed as well as Nuh Ismail Tani, a top army general.

In 1991, the Horn of Africa territory of Somaliland seceded from Somalia, which had itself gained independence from Britain in 1960. But for the past 28 years, Somaliland has remained officially unrecognized as a country – a status it resents.

Russia has also previously announced its intention to set up a naval base in Saylac, Somaliland while the United Arab Emirates is also building a military base in Berbera which includes a coastal-surveillance system.

February 3, 2020 News

Source: Ha’aretz

Netanyahu Heading to Uganda to Meet Regional Leaders

Israel currently deports asylum seekers to Uganda ■ Reports in recent years said Israel may renew ties with Muslim nations in Africa

Yoweri Museveni and Benjamin Netanyahu at the Entebbe airport in Uganda on July 4, 2016.

REUTERS/Presidential Press Unit/Handout via REUTERS

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu set out on Monday morning for a one-day visit to Uganda, where he is expected to meet with leaders of other African countries.

“I am setting out for another visit to Africa, my fifth in three and a half years,” Netanyahu stated. “Israel is making a big return to Africa, and Africa has already returned to Israel. These are important ties politically, economically and in terms of security,” he said, adding that he hopes to have good news upon his return.

In July 2016, the prime minister participated in a ceremony in Uganda to mark the 40th anniversary of Operation Entebbe, a hostage rescue by Israeli commandos at Entebbe Airport in 1976. The operation, which aimed to rescue 106 passengers of an Air France flight that was hijacked by members of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, succeeded in freeing 102 of the hostages. Netanyahu’s brother Yonatan, who led the mission, was killed.

During the 2016 visit, Netanyahu met Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni, Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta, Rwandan President Paul Kagame, South Sudan President Salva Mayardit, then-Ethiopian Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn Boshe, Zambian President Edgar Lungu and former Tanzanian Foreign Minister Augustine Mahiga.

It has also been reported that in the past, Israel contacted the American administration and other foreign governments in an attempt to encourage them to improve their relations with Sudan and to make overtures in its favor, in light of the severance of ties between the Arab-African country and Iran.

Reports in Israel and abroad in recent years have said that Israel might renew its diplomatic relations with several Muslim countries on the African continent, including Mali, Niger and Sudan. After Netanyahu visited Chad in 2019, it was reported that Israel was working to formalize ties with Sudan, and Israeli officials spoke  about it publicly on several occasions, especially after the ouster of  dictator Omar al-Bashir.

Haaretz previously reported that Israel had secretly deported asylum seekers from different African countries to Uganda. To this day, asylum seekers are being deported to Uganda in what Israel has called “voluntary departure.”

31 January 2020

United States Department of the Treasury (Washington, DC)

Washington, DC — The Ministers of Foreign Affairs and Water Resources of Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan and their delegations met with the Secretary of the Treasury and the President of the World Bank, participating as observers in negotiations on the filling and operation of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), in Washington, D.C. on January 28-31, 2020.  At the conclusion of the meetings, the Ministers reached an agreement on the following issues, subject to the final signing of the comprehensive agreement:

  1. a schedule for a stage based filling plan of the GERD; 
  2. a mitigation mechanism for the filling of the GERD during drought, prolonged drought, and prolonged periods of dry years; and
  3. a mitigation mechanism for the annual and long-term operation of the GERD in drought, prolonged drought, and prolonged periods of dry years.

They also discussed and agreed to finalize a mechanism for the annual and long-term operation of the GERD in normal hydrological conditions, a coordination mechanism, and provisions for the resolution of disputes and the sharing of information.  Moreover, they also agreed to address dam safety and pending studies on the environmental and social impacts of the GERD.

The Ministers have instructed their technical and legal teams to prepare the final agreement, which shall include the agreements reached above, for a signing of the three countries by the end of February, 2020.

The Ministers recognize the significant regional benefits that will result from this agreement and from the operation of the dam with respect to transboundary cooperation, regional development and economic integration.  The Ministers reaffirmed the importance of transboundary cooperation in the development of the Blue Nile to improve the lives of the people of Egypt, Ethiopia, and Sudan.

February 1, 2020

Trump’s Travel Ban Expanded

President Donald Trump is expanding his controversial travel ban to include six more countries.

Trump’s Travel Ban Expanded
HuffPost

LAGOS (Reuters) - Eritrea denounced a U.S. ban on immigrant visas for its citizens as "unacceptable" on Saturday, while Nigeria's government said it had created a committee to address the issues that prompted U.S. President Donald Trump to add the country to the ban.

Nigeria and Eritrea were among six countries, four of them in Africa, added to an expanded version of the U.S. visa ban announced on Friday in a presidential proclamation.

U.S. officials said the countries failed to meet U.S. security and information-sharing standards, which necessitated the new restrictions.

"Nigeria remains committed to maintaining productive relations with the United States and other international allies especially on matters of global security," a Nigerian presidential statement said.

Nigeria, the most populous nation in Africa, is the biggest country on the list whose citizens will be suspended from U.S. visas that can lead to permanent residency. Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan and Myanmar were also slapped with a similar ban.

Nigeria's information minister told Reuters they had no warning of their inclusion on the list before it appeared in the media. [L8N29W549]

Eritrean Foreign Minister Osman Saleh Mohammed said the government saw the ban as a political move that would hurt the country's relations with the United States.

"We find this move unacceptable," he told Reuters by telephone. "We will, however, not expel the U.S. ambassador," he added.

The U.S. government also said it will stop issuing "diversity visas" to nationals of Sudan and Tanzania.

The visas, which Trump has criticized, are available by lottery for applicants from countries with low rates of immigration.

(Reporting by Libby George in Lagos and Felix Onuah in Abuja Additional report by Giulia Paravicini in Addis Ababa; Editing by Angus MacSwan and Helen Popper)

Source=https://news.yahoo.com/nigeria-creates-committee-tackle-issues-145352173.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmluZy5jb20vc2VhcmNoP3E9ZXJpdHJlYStibGFzdHMrdS5zLit2aXNhK2JhbiUyQytuaWdlcmlhK2NyZWF0ZXMrY29tbWl0dGVlK3RvK2FkZHJlc3MraXNzdWVzJmZvcm09RURHVENUJnFzPVBGJmN2aWQ9MDc1Y2YxM2YxMDdjNDhhMGJiNThlZmFlM2NmYTI0MjYmcmVmaWc9YmRmYTU5YTQxNDZhNDQwY2UxYmM5ZTM4MzUwOTc4MzcmY2M9U0Umc2V0bGFuZz1lbi1VUyZlbHY9QVkzJTIxdUFZN3RiTk5aR1oyeWlHTmpmT0Vidnc2MXFlZDZMN0xIZmhWbkVhVUtwaG9mVjg0NDQzMGQzb044R2E5aVd6b3JqajVlYW4zbEV0NEJUSkxERWtXRnRyY2RXeW1GQWFYU2JUcHRzdkcmcGx2YXI9MCZQQz1MQ1RT&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAARIvAqGMOiUzx2mMfRm1qU7q5UJvm5wxBLwATLIuLdTwqj-W2uWPbJx4CToYH8bqzworh9rOoyhvUDtnSQuKUYxkSOBmnwyv5rgFBZItGawBZdnsqNNzQyX9m3KZvQlFNEPNRCp4eWyFkqGpOvJDRnxdcRWixK0ryJgsCpy9JgB

U.S. expanding immigrant limits

Saturday, 01 February 2020 21:19 Written by
story.lead_photo.caption In this Sept. 2017 file photo, a flag is waved outside the White House, in Washington. The Trump administration announced Friday that it was curbing legal immigration from six additional countries that officials said did not meet security screening standards, as part of an election-year push to further restrict immigration. Officials said immigrants from Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar, Eritrea, Nigeria, Sudan and Tanzania will face new restrictions in obtaining certain visas to come to the United States. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

WASHINGTON -- The Trump administration announced Friday that it was restricting immigrants from six additional countries that officials said failed to meet minimum security standards.

Officials said immigrants from Kyrgyzstan, Burma, Eritrea, Nigeria, Sudan and Tanzania will face new restrictions in obtaining certain visas to come to the United States. But it is not a total travel ban, unlike President Donald Trump's earlier effort that generated anger around the world for targeting Muslims.

Trump signed a proclamation on the restrictions Friday; they take effect Feb. 21.

The announcement came as Trump tries to promote his crackdown on immigration, highlighting a signature issue that motivated supporters in 2016. The administration recently announced birth tourism restrictions, and it is touting the sharp decline in crossings at the U.S.-Mexico border and citing progress on building the border wall.

"It is fundamental to national security, and the height of common sense, that if a foreign nation wishes to receive the benefits of immigration and travel to the United States, it must satisfy basic security conditions outlined by America's law enforcement and intelligence professionals," the White House said in a statement.

Kyrgyzstan, Burma, Eritrea and Nigeria are to see all immigrant visas suspended; those are applicants seeking to live in the U.S. permanently. They include visas for people sponsored by family members or employers as well as the diversity visa program that made up to 55,000 visas available in the most recent lottery.

In December, for example, 40,666 immigrant visas were granted, with the State Department using a computer drawing to select people from around the world.

Sudan and Tanzania will have diversity visas suspended. Nigeria is already excluded from the lottery along with other countries that had more than 50,000 natives immigrate to the U.S. in the previous five years.

Nonimmigrant visas are not affected. They are awarded to those traveling to the U.S. for a temporary stay, including visas for tourists, those doing business and people seeking medical treatment. During December, for example, about 650,760 nonimmigrant visas were granted worldwide.

The new restrictions were met with criticism from immigrant advocates, who slammed them as a new Muslim ban.

Sudan and Kyrgyzstan are majority-Muslim countries. Nigeria, the seventh-most-populous nation in the world with more than 200 million people, is about evenly split between Christians and Muslims but has the world's fifth-largest population of Muslims, according to the Pew Research Center.

Omar Jadwat, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Immigrants' Rights Project, said the previous visa restrictions should not be expanded.

"President Trump is doubling down on his signature anti-Muslim policy -- and using the ban as a way to put even more of his prejudices into practice by excluding more communities of color," he said, saying families, universities and businesses in the United States would be affected the most.

Rumors swirled for weeks about a potential new ban, and initially Belarus was considered. But Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was headed to the Eastern European nation as the restrictions were announced, and Belarus was not on the list.

Acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf said Homeland Security officials would work with the countries on bolstering their security requirements to help them work to get off the list. Wolf said some nations were able to comply with the new standards in time.

"These countries for the most part want to be helpful, they want to do the right thing, they have relationships with the U.S., but for a variety of different reasons failed to meet those minimum requirements," Wolf said.

The current restrictions follow Trump's travel ban, which the Supreme Court upheld as lawful in 2018. They are significantly softer than Trump's initial ban, which had suspended travel from Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen for 90 days, blocked refugee admissions for 120 days, and suspended travel from Syria. The government suspended most immigrant and nonimmigrant visas to applicants from those countries. Exceptions are available for students and those with "significant contacts" in the U.S.

Trump has said a travel ban is necessary to protect Americans. But opponents have argued that he seeks to target Muslim countries, pointing to comments he made as a candidate in 2015 calling for a "total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on."

The seven countries in the travel ban include nations with little or no diplomatic relationship to the U.S. and five majority-Muslim nations: Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen.

Observers had expected a new announcement around the third anniversary of the Jan. 27, 2017, enactment of the first order.

A Section on 02/01/2020

Print Headline: U.S. expanding immigrant limits

Source=https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2020/feb/01/u-s-expanding-immigrant-limits-20200201/

Ethiopia’s navy is reborn – in Djibouti

Saturday, 01 February 2020 11:28 Written by

February 1, 2020 Ethiopia, News

The revival of Ethiopian Navy, the Horn of Africa, the Red Sea, Regional power dynamics

Special for Africa ExPress
Makeda Saba
24 January 2020

The modern Ethiopian Navy was established by Emperor Haile Selassie, with the assistance of the United Kingdon, in 1955 and had its Naval Headquarters in Massawa with presence in: Assab; Dhalak Islands and Asmara.

In 1991, at the end of the Eritrean war for independence, Ethiopia became a landlocked country. For a while, the Ethiopian Navy continued to patrol the Red Sea, using Yemen as its operational base. By 1993 operations from Yemen ceased and the Ethiopian Navy moved to Djibouti. Though the Ethiopian Government attempted to negotiate, with Eritrea, access for its Navy to Assab, this was not an arrangement that newly independent State of Eritrea could accept.

Djibuti to host Ethiopia’s Navy

Even though, Eritrea did not allow Ethiopia to establish a Naval presence in Assab, at the time it did seek Ethiopian support during it dispute with Yemen over the Hanish Islands. Hence, Ethiopia leased to Eritrea (1996) 4 military helicopters. These helicopters were never returned to Ethiopia as by 1998 the Eritrea/Ethiopia border war started.[i]

By 1996 the Ethiopian Navy ceased to exist. However, Ethiopia’s commercial fleet continued to access both the port of Massawa and Assab. This activity ended when the Eritrea/ Ethiopia border war started in 1998.[ii] Therefore, Ethiopia with a population of over 100 million people, became totally dependent on Djibouti for commercial access to the sea. [iii]

Since 1998, realising the vulnerability of depending on only one port, Ethiopia has adopted a strategy of diversification of port access both on the Red Sea as well as the Indian Ocean. Therefore, it has negotiated access to ports in Djibouti, Somalia (Berbera); Kenya (Mombasa; Lamu); Sudan (Port Sudan). In the port of Berbera, the Ethiopian government has acquired a 19% interest in the development of the port. The other partners in the project are DP World with a 51% share: and Somaliland with a 30% share. [iv] The Ethiopian government has also negotiated an ownership share in the port of Djibouti [v] as well as Port Sudan.[vi] And, it has been busy developing the infrastructure to connect Ethiopia to the ports such as the rail link to Djibouti[vii]; the road links to Berbera[viii] and Lamu. [ix]

Ethiopia is not the only State seeking to establish a strategic presence along the shipping routes of the Bab al Mandab Strait and the Suez Canal. A route that links the Indian Ocean, the Red Sea and the Mediterranean Sea.  In recent years, China; Turkey, United Arab Emirates (UAE) have, in addition to economic presence, secured a military presence in an effort to secure the shipping lane from pirate and other interferences. [x]

Since the events of the Arab Spring in 2011 both Saudi Arabia and UAE started to focus on the East and Horn of Africa as strategic for their efforts to counter and minimize the reach and influence of Iran and possibly contain ‘Arab Spring Like “democratising events. Both governments are absolute monarchies who according to Dr Mehari Taddele Maru[xi]:

“…. [totally] reject any form of republican democratic rule. As a result, they are resistant to any kind of democratic dispensation in the region as well as the Horn of Africa……. [The] monarchs of these two countries…. [ consider] that any democratic dispensation in the region could …[threaten] their power.”

In the Horn of Africa, the Saudi and UAE governments have acquire interests in the management of key port facilities (Djibouti, Berbera; Port Sudan), they have also established military bases in Somalia (Mogadishu); on the Yemeni Island of Socotra as well as in Eritrea (Assab). From Assab the Saudi/UAE coalition are launching military operations against Yemen as well as carrying out training of Yemeni counterterrorism forces. The Saudi/UAE coalition also provides equipment to the trained Yemeni counterterrorism forces.

The expanding UAE/Saudi influence in the Horn of Africa region, was recently evidenced in June 2018:

“…. [when] Eritrea and Ethiopia announced – after a flurry of visits to and from Emirati officials – that they had reached an agreement to end their thirty-year war.

The ending of the “No Peace and No War” status between Eritrea and Ethiopia, was followed by the: opening of land borders; lifting of UN sanctions on Eritrea; re-establishing of telecommunication links as well as air transport. For the first time, in more than twenty years, Ethiopian ships docked in the Eritrean ports of Massawa and Assab fuelling the hope of future trade and economic normalisation between the two countries and, there were visions of road and possibly rail networks linking the two countries.

However, as of December 2018, all the land borders between Eritrea and Ethiopia are closed. And, there is no clear and transparent process addressing the border issues between the two countries or the economic and trade normalisation. The peace process between the two countries, is stagnating as is highlighted by such events as the failure of President Isaias Afwerki to accept, for more than 18 months, the credentials of the Ethiopian Ambassador H.E. Redwan Hussein. A situation that was remedied only in December 2019 after the intervention of the UAE. [xii]

Thoughthis stagnation is not ideal, it may be a situation that Prime Minister Abiy is temporarily happy to live with, as he works to: (i) transition the country away from a command style economy as well as a political environment dominated by the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) and, by extension the Tigray People Liberation Front (TPLF); (ii) prepare the country  for the general elections in 2020; (iii)  assert the role of Ethiopia as a regional power and, (iv) protect her interests by securing negotiated access to multiple port facilities; as well as projecting military power.

Abiy Ahmed, primo ministro dell’Etiopia

According to a BBC report [xiii] the Ethiopian government became very concerned that: “that Djibouti was controlled by foreign naval forces. US, China, Japan and France ….”.  Therefore, aware of the strategic and political threat posed to the Ethiopian interest  by: (i) the presence of foreign military powers along the coastal areas of the Horn of Africa; (ii) piracy; (iii)human trafficking;  as well as (iv) the ongoing proxy war between Saudi Arabia/UAE coalition and Iran in Yemen; the Ethiopia government, in addition to a strategy of diversifying its access to ports, has also adopted a strategy of boosting its military presence in the region by establishing a Navy to protect its interest in the shipping routes of the Bab al Mandab Strait with a focus on both the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean.[xiv]

The formation of the new Ethiopian Navy is an initiative that has received support from France. Who, in March 2019 agreed, as part of its own endeavours to boost its economic ties with the country, to help the Ethiopian government to build a navy.[xv] According to Capital Ethiopia the new navy[xvi]: “… [ will] be based in Djibouti”? A location that is facilitated by the existing infrastructure links such as roads and rail.

In addition to the economic and military efforts, the Ethiopian government is also working at the diplomatic level to maintain political relationships with all the foreign powers with an interest in the Horn of Africa and, the shipping routes of the Bab al Mandab Strait.  This diplomatic engagement includes Qatar, who is a rival of the Saudi and UAE. Hence, the President of Ethiopia – Sahle Work Zewde, has recently met with the Qatar’s Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, H.E Sheikh Mohamed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, to review bilateral relationships between the two states and how to improve them. [xvii]

To date, though Eritrean government websites such as TesfaNews have reported on the formation of the new Ethiopian navy and its location in Djibouti, officially the Eritrean government has not reacted. Despite the efforts of the Saudi/Emirate coalition, as well as the Ethiopian government, the relationship between Eritrea and Djibouti is also not progressing to address outstanding issues of the Eritrea/Djibouti border; as well as the fate of Djiboutian soldiers missing in action since 2008.[xviii] Hence, It is possible that the Eritrean government will interpret the presence of an Ethiopian navy in Djibouti as a threat and a further justification to maintain  a policy of  indefinite National Service.