Coronavirus, Covid19 – information leaflets in Tigrinya and Arabic

These leaflets have been provided by a range of organisations. They are important in helping people tackle this virus in their own language.

Screenshot 2020-04-11 at 07.31.38

You can find all the leaflets here

Here are  some in Tigrinya (more available here)

COVIDSickANDExposed_TI

COVIDExposedNOTSickYet_TI

stop-the-spread-of-germs-tigryna

sick-with-2019-nCoV-fact-sheet-tigryna

feelingsick-tigrinya-branded

2019-ncov-factsheet_TIGRINYA

TIGRINYA

Here are some Arabic (more available here)

Caregivingforlovedones-Arabic

COVIDcasepositiveARABIC

Arabic stop-the-spread-of-germs poster 3.18.2020 disclaimer

130-012-AR

sick-with-2019-nCoV-fact-sheet-arabic

COVIDcasepositiveARABIC (1)

feelingsick-arabic-branded

Saturday, 11 April 2020 20:45

Radio Dimtsi Harnnet Sweden 11.04.2020

Written by

ኤርትራውያን ብዛዕባ ኢሳያስን ቀይናን ኣተሓሳስባኡን፡ እንታይ ይብሉን እንታይ ይገብሩን በቲ ተግባሩ ዝቕየስ እምበር ንምንኣዱ ኮነ ንምንቃፉ፡ ከም ልበ-ወለድ ዝንገርን ዝድረስን ኣይኮነን። ኢሳያስ ግና ኣብ ማእከል ጐልጐል ክነኣድን ክምጎስን ዝደሊ ዓይኒ ሓሰኻ ዘየብሉ ዕቡይን ስሱዕን ፍጡር እዩ። ሒደት ዘይበሃሉ ኤርትራውያን ካብ ናይ ቅድም ኣነቓቕላኡ ጀሚሮም ብዛዕባኡ ዕቃበን ጥርጣረን ከም ዝነበሮምን ክቓለስዎ ከም ዝጸንሑን ስኑድ እዩ።

ብኣንጻሩ ብዙሓት ኤርትራውያን፡ ብፍላይ ከኣ ኣብ እዋን ብረታዊ ቃልስን ኣብ ግዜ ናጽነትን ኤርትራን፡ ልዕሊ ዝግበኦ ሕሉፍ ሓሊፎም ብግጥምን ዜማን ንኢደሞን ኣመጒሰምዎን። “ወዲ ኣፎም ብርየ፡ ንሱ ኣንበሳ ዓሻክሩ ነብርየ” ተባሂሉ። “ወዲ ኣፎም፡ ኢሱ ….. ወዘተ” ዝብሉ ናይ ቅብጥሮት ኣስማት እውን ኣውጺአምሉ። እንተኾነ እዚ ናእዳን ቅብጥሮትን ንዝተወሰነ ግዜ ሒዝዎ ዝጸንሐ ንላዕሊ ናይ ምንቅዕራር ኣመልካቲ (ግራፍ)፡ ኣቕጣጫኡ ቀይሩ ናብ ቁልቁል ክንቆት፡ ደሓር ከኣ ንሓዋሩ ከምዘይትንስእ መሬት ክዘብጥ ግዜ ኣይወሰደሉን። ሚዛን ህዝቢ ኤርትራ ኣብ ኢሳያስ ንከንቆቁል፡ ኣብ ልዕሊ ናይ ውግእ ሓርበኛታት ማይሓባር ዝወሰዶ ጭካነ፡ ኣተገባብራ ግዱድ ውትህድርና፡ ምስ ዝተፈላለያ ጐረባብቲ ሃገራት ዝኣጐዶ ተኽታዂ ውግኣት፡ ሕገመንግስቲ ከይትግበር ብኢደ ወነኑ ምእጋድ፡ ኣካይዳና ሕገመንግስታዊ መልክዕ ይሓዝ ንዝበሉ ብጉጅለ 15 ዝፍለጡ ገዳይም ተቓለስቲ ምእሳር፡ ኣብ ሃይማኖታዊ ትካላት ኢድ ምእታውን መራሕተን ምእሳርን ምቕታልን ትካላተን ምውራስን፡ ንዝተወሰነ ግዜ መማረጺ ሓበሬታ ሒዘን ክቐርባ ጀሚረን ዝነበራ ናይ ብሕቲ ጋዜጣታት ምዕጻውን ጋዜተኛታተን ምእሳርን፡ ኣብ ልኡላውነት ኤርትራ ምውጋይን ሎሚ ከኣ እነሆ ህዝብና ብሰንኪ ዓለም ለኻዊ ለበዳ ሕማም ኮሮና ኣብ ጨንቂ እናሃለወ ነብሱ ፈትዩ ምሕባእን ዝኣመሰሉ ተግባራት ዘቃልዕዎ ተግባራት እዮም። እዞም ውትሩ ዝጥቀሱ ኣበሳታት  ኢሳያስን ምምሕዳሩን ነናቶም ንህዝብና ደም ዘንብዑ ዝርዝራት ኣለዉዎም።

ህዝቢ ኤርትራ ነዞም ዝተጠቕሱን ካለኦትን ጸይቅታት ህግዲፍ ምኹናንን ምቅዋምን ጥራይ ዘይኮነ፡ ከምኡ ዓይነት ተግባራት ነውሪ ዝኾነሉ፡ ብሕገ-መንግስቲ ዝቕለስ ስርዓ-መንግስቲ ንምትካል ኣብ መስርሕ ቃልሲ ዘሎ ህዝቢ እዩ። ህላወን ንጥፈታትን ተቓወምቲ ፖለቲካዊ ሰልፍታትን ውድባትን ኤርትራ፡ ህዝባዊ ምንቅስቓሳትን ካለኦት ተበግሶታትን ከኣ ነዚ እዩ ዘመልክት። እቲ ኣንጻር ኢሳያስን ጉጅለኡን ናይ ምቅላስ ንቕሎን ተበግሶን ማዕባሊ እምበር፡ በዞም ክሳብ ሕጂ ተጋሂዶም ዘለዉ ኤርትራዊ ናይ ቃልሲ ትካላትን ባእታታትን ጥራይ ተደሪቱ ዝግለጽ ኣይኮነን። ኣብዚ ቀረባ መዓልታት፡ 95 ልዑል ደረጃ ትምህርቲ ዘለዎም ኤርትራውን ነቲ ቃልሲኳ ኣጋይሽ እንተዘይኮኑ፡ ብሓባር ኣብ ጐኒ ህዝቦም ከም ዝስለፉ ምእዋጆም፡ ንኤርትራዊ ሓይልታት ለውጢ ዓብይ ፍናን ዝህብ እዩ። ብኣንጻሩ ከኣ ንዕርበት ጸሓይ ኢሳያስ ዘቀላጥፍ  እዩ። ከምኡ እውን ነቲ ገለን ብጉርሒ ገለን ድማ ብገርህንፍርሕን ሓሓሊፉ ዝርአ ደገፍ ንኢሳያስ ዝሓክኽ እዩ። እዚ ምሁራዊ ኣበርክተኦም ቀጻሊ ክኸውን ናይ ኩልና ትጽቢት ምዃኑ ምዝኽኻሮም ከኣ ኣገዳሲ እዩ።

ጸረ ህዝቢ ተግባራት ኢሳያስ ከምቲ ንሱ ዝደልዮን ዝሓስቦን ኣብ ኤርትራ ጥራይ ተሓቢኡ ዝተርፍ ኣይኮነን። ብኣንጻሩ ጽልዋኡ ካብ ኤርትራ ወጻኢ ከንጸባርቕ ናይ ግድን እዩ። ኤርትራውያን ሓይልታት ለውጢ ኣብ ኩሉ ኩርነዓት ወጻኢ ዓለምና ኩነታት ኤርትራ ክትርዳእን ኣብ ልዕሊ ምምሕዳር ዲክታቶር ኢሳያስ  ናይ ዓገብ ተጸዕኖኣ ከተሕይል ክሰርሑ ጸኒሖምን ኣለዉን። ነቲ ጸረ ህዝቢ ተግባራቱ ዝምጥን ውጽኢትኳ እንተዘይኮነ ሳላ ቃልሲ ኤርትራውያን ኣብ ወጻኢ ኣብዚ እዋንዚ ኣብ ልዕሊ ኢሳያስ ዝወርድ ዘሎ ተጽዕኖታት፡ ንኡስ ዝመስል ግና ድማ እንዳማዕበለ ዝኸይድን ቀጻልን እዩ። ኣብዚ ቀረባ እዋን ጉዳይ ሰብኣዊ መሰል ኣብ ኤርትራ ክከታተላ ብባይቶ ሰብኣዊ መሰል ሕቡራት ሃገራት ዝተመዛ ወ/ሮ ዳኒየላ ክራቨትዝ ምምሕዳር ኣቶ ኢሳይስ ብህጹጽ ናይ ሕልናን ፖለቲካን እሱራት ክፈትሕ ዘቕረበኦ መጸዋዕታ ሓላፍነት ዝስመዖ መራሒ ሃገር እየ ንዝብል ቀሊል ግምት ዝወሃቦ ኣይኮነን። ብጉዳይ ጋዜጠኛታት ዝግደሱ ትካላትን ዓበይቲ ማዕከናት ዜናን ንጉዳይና ዝህብዎ ዘለዉ ቆላሕታ እውን ቀሊል ኣይኮነን። ኤርትራዊ ዛዕባ ብቐንዱ ንዓና ንኤርትራውያን ዝምልከትኳ እንተኾነ፡ ኣብ ቅድሚ ሕብረተሰብ ዓለምን ትካላቱን ቦታ ምርካቡ ከኣ ኣዝዩ ሓጋዚ እዩ።

ዘራጊ ተግባራት ኢሳያስ ቀንዲ መንቀሊኡን ምንጩን ደኣ ኣብ ኤርትራ ይኹን እምበር፡ ብፍላይ ንጐረባትና ዘቕስን ኣይኮነን። ኢሳያስ ንቐልቢ ህዝብናኳ ሎሚ እንደየናይ ከይጥምዝዞ፡  ንቀልቢ ናይ ርሑቕ ተዓዘብቲ ንምጥምዛዝ ኣብዚ ከባቢና ኣብ ዝሓለፈ ኣዋርሕ ምዕግርጋር ጀሚሩ ነይሩ።  ነቲ ኣብ ምብራቕ ኣፍሪቃ ክሰርሕ ዝጸንሐ ብሰንኪ ዘይውሕሉል ዲፕሎማስያዊ ኣተሓሕዛኡ  ዝገደፎ ከባብያዊ ናይ ልምዓት ማሕበር  ኢጋድ ኣፍሪሱ ካልእ ምትእኽኻብ ክፈጥር ተንቀሳቒሱ። እንተኾነ ከምቲ “ስንኩል ንስንኩል ይዋቕዑ ብድንኩል” ዝበሃል፡ ብዘይካ ነቶም ከምኡ ብዙሕ ዘይተወገነ ዘቤታዊ ጸገማት ዘለዎም መራሕቲ ሶማልን ኢትዮያን ንኻለኦት ከዕግብ ኣይከኣለን። ህዝቢ ሶማልን ኢትዮጵያን እውን ኣካይዳ ኢሳያስ ካብ ቀደሙ ዘራጊ ምዃኑ ስለ ዝርድኡ፡ ብፍላይ ከኣ ኢትዮጵያውያን ምሁራትን ፖለቲከኛታትን ብዝተፈላለዩ መንገድታት “ኣብ ውሽጣዊ ጉዳይና ኣይትእተወና” ይብልዎ ኣለዉ። ቅድሚ ወርሒ ኣቢሉ 49 ኢትዮጵያውያን ደቂ ኦሮሙ ዶክተራት ብቐጥታ ናብ ኢሳያስ ዝጸሓፍዎ ናይ “ኢድካን እግርኻን ኣክበልና” ደብዳበን እቶም ውሽጡን ውሻጠኡን ዝፈልጡዎ ነባራት መራሕቲ ህዝባዊ ወያነ ሓርነት ትግራይ ከሰምዕዎ ዝጸንሑ ስምዕታን ከኣ ኢሳያስ ኣብ ዘዝኸዶ ይኸስር ከም ዘሎ ዘረድእ እዩ። እታ ዕርክነት ኢሳይስን ዶ/ር ኣብይ ኣሕመድን እውን “ሞተት ሰተኾት” ትበሃል ዘላ እያ ትመስል።

እምበኣር ከምቲ “ንነዊት ጨነቖ፡ በቲ ኣርዑት ሓነቖ፡ በቲ ከኣ ዕርፊ ተወቖ” ዝበሃል፡ ኢሳያስ ብዓዲ ኮነ ብግዳም ቀጻልነቱ ትቕምስል እያ ዘላ። ዝያዳ ንክትሓርር ከኣ ሕጂ እውን ዝጽበየና ሓቢርካ ናይ ምጽዳፉ ቀሊል ግና ከኣ ኣገዳሲ ዕማም ኣለና። እዚ ግና፡ ቀንዲ እዋናዊ ቀዳምነትና ህዝብና ብኮሮና ቫይረስ ከይህሰ ምስራሕ ምዃኑ ብዘይምዝንጋዕ እዩ።

Progressive Alliance Statement on Covid 19 1

(Printed below is a must-read declaration approved by over 100 social democratic, socialist and progressive parties in the Progressive Alliance, in which Eritrea is represented by the EPDP - Eritrean People’s Democratic Party in exile. The statement calls upon democratic and progressive forces to play a leading role in shaping a new World Order in the aftermath of this pandemic. For now, it calls for the creation of an international fund under the UN to support the treatment of coronavirus patients worldwide to tackle its long-term consequences. It underlines the important of give due attention to peoples that cannot expect “financial support nor medical protection from their governments.” The statement adds: “Immediate medical support needed for refugee camps in preparation for the spread of the viral disease. Refugees and displaced persons are most vulnerable and must not be forgotten. International institutions and states must continue and even increase their aid and assistance.” -- Good reading, Harnnet.org).

Borderless challenges require borderless solidarity:

The Covid-19 pandemic has become a scourge for mankind. Hundreds of thousands have already contracted it and many thousands have died and will die of it. The virus causes enormous suffering, creates individual and collective insecurity worldwide by threatening people across borders and destabilizing entire countries and regions.

The fatal consequences of this pandemic particularly affect people who are less fortunate, who are already starving and who cannot expect financial support nor medical protection from their governments and public authorities, those who are suffering of war and expulsion where again women are the most exposed. Covids-19 is an enormous challenge for everyone.

Medical and health care as well as social and economic systems are reaching their stress limits. Progressive answers to these challenges are needed – today and for the time afterwards. Social Democrats, Socialists and Progressives are at the forefront in fighting the health, social and economic effects of this unprecedented crisis.

What we need is social cohesion and solidarity, at national and global level! Over the next few weeks, the foundations of a new world order shall be laid. Progressives need to raise their voices now in order to have a say in its shaping. The shift of control over vital public services to the private market only is the wrong path. We now can see clearly that social security and health care are not costs to be cut, but essential pillars of good functioning societies which need sustainable investments.

The ignorance and arrogance of the nationalists and populists divide societies and endangers us all. Their path is wrong and put human lives at risk - this is now more evident than ever - lacking any ethical or humanist reference and undermining our democracies. Already now, the struggle over who will have to bear the costs of the necessary rescue packages has begun.

Different from the response to the financial crisis of 2008, our democracies, societies, economies and simply the planet cannot afford another decade of austerity or uncontrolled markets.

Solidarity means that the strong use their strength to help the weak. The answer to this crisis is global solidarity. We, the parties and organisations of the Progressive Alliance, defending a multilateral approach therefore demand and promote an immediate and bold global agenda:

We call for acute measures:

  • § A global humanitarian ceasefire as urgently demanded by the UN Secretary General in order to create the necessary space to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic, even in war and crisis areas – also an immediate ending of politically motivated embargos in order to allow access to food and medical supply. It is now about saving lives and mitigating the spread of the virus.
  • § Global cooperation and coordination are the prerequisite for a successful fight against the effects caused by Covid-19. We call on governments to apply without delay the recommendation of the WHO. Those who isolate themselves and do not support others with all their possibilities show a lack of solidarity and are responsible for a major catastrophe. Mutual global support is needed by politicians, research institutes and companies to support those states and people in vulnerable areas across borders in their search for political and medical solutions.
  • § Immediate medical support for refugee camps in preparation for the spread of the viral disease. Refugees and displaced persons are most vulnerable and must not be forgotten. International institutions and states must continue and even increase their aid and assistance.

In the medium run we call:

  • § For an international fund to be created by the United Nations to support the treatment of coronavirus patients worldwide and to tackle the long-term consequences. This fund needs not only to enable acute measures, but also future-oriented investments in the general interest. We call for intensified development cooperation as we must shoulder the costs of the pandemic together as the impact and costs of the corona crisis will be enormous and will overtax many states, rush them in severe financial and economic crisis.
  • § The G20 to work closely with the United Nations to coordinate tax and monetary policies, as well as trade resumption and joint aid packages. National crisis policy is necessary and justified, poor and weak countries cannot be let alone to face the situation. The G20 countries and other strong economies are required to step up.

To prevent the risk of a new debt crisis, for tax avoidance to be coordinated and combated effectively in order to create new fiscal space and room for manoeuvre for global financing of global challenges. Targeted debt relief strategies and orderly state insolvency proceedings could take some pressure out of the debt bubble:

  • § To consider investment in health and care services as an essential investment in general interest. Covid19-crisis is not least a social crisis. Health systems at national level and worldwide are reaching their stress limit or are already beyond it. If a proof was necessary the pandemic clearly shows that the neoliberal mantra of maximizing profits at the expense of health, social and public services has also led to this crisis and weakens the states’ ability to respond and leaves people behind without any access to medical help.
  • § To agree in short term on price controls for important medical goods, international cooperation in vaccine research and clinical tests, dismantling of patent protection, helping the most affected countries to stabilise their health systems and securing the supply chains for medical goods.
  • § To review neoliberal reforms of common goods and services which have failed. We need social protection floors in all countries like requested by ILO, we urge for communalisation of public health systems as well as sustainable social investment.
  • § On the governments of the nation states to raise the respective minimum and living wages significantly in the health, care and service sector. Cost pressures were passed down in the last decades, with the result that the workers who ensure our health care and services today are at the end of wages and salaries and are not adequately protected against the virus they fight today.
  • § For an international agreement on sustainable investment programs on social infrastructures. Unlike after the financial crisis, it is important that the new liquidity on the capital markets will flow into socially meaningful real sustainable investments, e.g. social infrastructures, green deal packages etc. in the general interest to promote the socioecological transition alongside the 2030 agenda.
  • § For a redeveloped multilateralism where Progressives are in the lead for alternative policies and promoting the public interest. We call for strengthening multilateralism and giving international institutions more decision-making power. The legal and financial foundations must now be expanded. This virus does not recognise borders. While the list of challenges that we can only tackle globally and collectively is getting longer, multilateralism is on the decline. Many international institutions, such as the United Nations and the WTO, are underfunded and in crisis today, unable to fulfil their intended roles for global governance. In times of crisis more than ever: good and democratically legitimised governance are needed The largely uncontrolled advance of this unprecedent pandemic is currently used by authoritarian and undemocratic regimes to reduce even more democratic and civic space, fundamental rights and democratic institutions. Social democrats, Socialists and Progressives need to coordinate in regional and international institutions to ensure that such attempts shall not remain without consequences. Support to progressive and democratic civil society is needed.
  • · We commit to defend the rule of democratic law, the individual and collective fundamental rights and civil liberties;
  • · We promote strengthening solidarity at national and global level;
  • · We defend and promote transparency and democratic participation in good governance;
  • · We stand against any attempt of stigmatisation of refugees or minorities. Combating the effects of Covid-19 crisis needs democratic control and governance through parliaments, including use of new forms of communication in order to secure space of political debate on choices of policies, programmes and projects. The virus does not know any borders. The response to the virus cannot know any borders either! As social democrats, socialists and progressives we engage for better coordination, common approaches and set a new global progressive paradigm through our global network: the Progressive Alliance.

By RODNEY MUHUMUZA Associated Press

KAMPALA, Uganda — Weeks before the coronavirus spread through much of the world, parts of Africa were already threatened by another kind of plague, the biggest locust outbreak some countries had seen in 70 years.

Now the second wave of the voracious insects, some 20 times the size of the first, is arriving. Billions of the young desert locusts are winging in from breeding grounds in Somalia in search of fresh vegetation springing up with seasonal rains.

Millions of already vulnerable people are at risk. And as they gather to try to combat the locusts, often in vain, they risk spreading the virus — a topic that comes a distant second for many in rural areas.

It is the locusts that “everyone is talking about,” said Yoweri Aboket, a farmer in Uganda. “Once they land in your garden they do total destruction. Some people will even tell you that the locusts are more destructive than the coronavirus. There are even some who don’t believe that the virus will reach here.”

Some farmers in Abokat's village near the Kenyan border bang metal pans, whistle or throw stones to try to drive the locusts away. But mostly they watch in frustration, largely barred by a coronavirus lockdown from gathering outside their homes.

A failed garden of cassava, a local staple, means hunger. Such worries in the village of some 600 people are reflected across a large part of East Africa, including Kenya, Ethiopia and South Sudan. The locust swarms also have been sighted in Djibouti, Eritrea, Tanzania and Congo.

The U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization has called the locust outbreak, caused in part by climate change, "an unprecedented threat” to food security and livelihoods. Its officials have called this new wave some 20 times the size of the first.

“The current situation in East Africa remains extremely alarming as ... an increasing number of new swarms are forming in Kenya, southern Ethiopia and Somalia,” a new FAO assessment said.

Favorable breeding conditions through May mean there likely will be another new round of swarms in late June and July, coinciding with the start of the harvest season, the agency said.

The U.N. has raised its aid appeal from $76 million to $153 million, saying immediate action is needed before more rainfall fuels further growth in locust numbers. So far the FAO has collected $111 million in cash or pledges.

The locusts are “invading the Eastern Africa region in exceptionally large swarms like never seen before," the Nairobi-based Climate Prediction and Application Center said.

The new swarms include “young adults,” voracious bugs “that eat more than the adult ones,” said Kenneth Mwangi, a satellite information analyst at the center.

Mwangi and other officials in Kenya cited difficulties in fighting the infestation as coronavirus-related travel restrictions slow cross-border travel and delay the delivery of pesticides.

The verification work of field officers has been curtailed, making it harder for the center to update regional prediction models, Mwangi said.

In rural Laikipia county, among the worst affected in Kenya, some are calling attention to the threat to commercial farms.

“I think, unfortunately, because of other things going on around the world, people are forgetting about the problem with the locusts. But it’s a very, very real problem," farmer George Dodds told the FAO.

Aerial spraying is the only effective way to control the locust outbreak. After the locusts crossed into Uganda for the first time since the 1960s, soldiers resorted to using hand-held spray pumps because of difficulties in obtaining the needed aircraft.

Uganda's agriculture minister said authorities are unable to import enough pesticides from Japan, citing disruptions to international cargo shipments.

The government is yet to meet an additional budget of over $4 million requested for locust control, the minister said.

The sum is substantial in a country where the president has been fundraising from wealthy people to help respond to the virus and its economic disruption. Health workers are threatening to strike over lack of protective gear.

Other countries face similar challenges.

In Ethiopia, where some 6 million people live in areas affected by the locust outbreak, the infestation if unchecked “will cause large-scale crop, pasture and forest-cover loss, worsening food and feed insecurity,” the FAO says.

Bands of immature locusts are forming in areas that include the country’s breadbasket, the Rift Valley region, it said.

Ethiopia’s agriculture minister has said efforts are underway to deploy six helicopters against the infestation that could last until late August.

But ministry spokesman Moges Hailu spoke of an ominous sign: The locust swarms are now appearing in locations where they had not been previously sighted.

Friday, 10 April 2020 13:33

Egypt’s Nile monopoly is over

Written by

April 10, 2020 Eritrea Hub Ethiopia, News

Source: Ethiopia Insight
April 9, 2020, by Moges Zewdu Teshome
 
Gerd 1
 
History teaches us that when change arrives, the best way to deal with it is not to resist, but to adapt
The Nile River, the longest river in the world, stretches across eleven countries.
The Blue Nile, its largest tributary, originates from the Ethiopian highlands and flows all the way to Egypt until it enters the Mediterranean Sea.

Herodotus, two and a half thousand years ago, claimed Egypt as ‘‘the gift of the Nile’’ because it depended on its water and the fertile soils washed from the Ethiopian highlands.
 
For Egyptians, this narrative is as true today as it was thousands of years ago—but Egyptians seemingly forget that the river originates elsewhere. They allow its symbolic value to surpass its economic value. Egypt considers any tampering with the Nile River as a matter of life and death. This explains the combative approach of the Egyptian government towards negotiations over ‘‘fair and equitable utilization’’ of the Nile River.

Upper riparian countries that contribute the entirety of the water that reaches the lower basin countries, Egypt and Sudan, made no effort to tame this trans-boundary river in the past.  It was not until 1999 that the nine-nation Nile Basin Initiative (NBI) was set up, launching a series of negotiations over fair and equitable utilization of the Nile River. This showed good progress and culminated in the Cooperative Framework Agreement (the Entebbe Agreement) signed by six out of ten riparian countries in 2010. Egypt refused to sign the agreement and froze its membership in the NBI, disagreeing with upper riparian states over ‘fair and equitable utilisation’. Playing a zero-sum game, it appeared only concerned about the relative gains of other riparian states.

In a broader context, this contention demonstrates tension between the forces of continuity and of change. The assertiveness of the upper riparian countries signified a formidable force of change; a stubborn Egypt stands as an inflexible defender of continuity. Can the force of continuity hold ground when faced by a burgeoning force of change caused by the fundamentally different circumstances of today?

The force of continuity: Egyptian mythology

In any discussion concerning the use of the Nile, Egypt has always boldly claimed historical rights over ‘its water’, including the right to veto any attempt to utilize the river by upstream countries. This claim results partly from a long-held mythology and partly from its erroneous interpretation of treaties and principles of international law. The myth, simply stated, is predicated on the civil law doctrine of res nullius, something belonging to no one or abandoned. The Nile River was adopted by the ancient Egyptians and now it exclusively belongs to Egypt. The underlying assumption was that it could be appropriated by one nation to the total exclusion of others. This is, of course, totally unfounded, and could in fact equally apply to upstream countries, allowing Ethiopia or others to tame the river, with due consideration of others’ rights.

Egypt dressed up its ‘exclusive rights’ with implausible legal arguments, revolving around claims of the binding nature of treaties on (non-involved) parties and the customary law principle of ‘not causing significant harm’. The first is the 1902 Agreement between Britain and Ethiopia on the delimitation of the frontier between Ethiopia and Sudan, though Britain has no more direct interest over the utilization of the Nile River. There has been a fundamental change of circumstances and the principle of state succession does not apply to decolonization.
 
Gerd 2
 
Why the U.S. lost its way on the Nile

The recent debacle reflects an unstable global order overseen by an unpredictable superpower with waning moral and legal authority.

The post-colonial states, in this case Egypt and Sudan, acquired a distinct and new legal personality. Even if an argument could be made that the treaty was still valid, article III only prohibits actions that ‘arrest’ or totally affect the flow of Nile River to downstream states. No upstream state has ever held such a position, which would be against the principle of causing ‘no significant harm’, a principle to which all upstream riparian countries fully subscribe.

In fact, the 1902 agreement has also been repealed by two subsequent treaties (the 1929 Treaty and the 1959 Treaty), between Egypt and Britain. The 1929 treaty gives Egypt the right to veto any future projects to be developed on the Nile River; the 1959 treaty apportions the water of the entire Nile River between Egypt, Sudan, and evaporation. Ethiopia is not a party to either of these treaties and is not bound by any of their stipulations. A treaty is binding only on the parties which signed it.

Egypt also contended that under customary international law, no state should cause significant harm to the interests (existing or future) of other states. Indeed, although it has yet to be properly defined, the ‘no significant harm’ principle has acquired a customary international law status. Equally, a state which claims that significant harm has been caused to its interests by other state(s) must show the actual existence of such harm. The International Court of Justice, for example, stated Nicaragua must prove the existence of trans-boundary harm, in its judgement on the case between Costa Rica vs. Nicaragua, in para.217.
Gerd 3
 
Grand Nile compromise—a Sisyphean task?
Egypt and Ethiopia are unlikely to strike terms over GERD without agreeing a new legal framework governing the Nile Basin.
Egypt has claimed the ‘no significant harm’ factor is relevant to aspects of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), but this is essentially contrary to the Environmental Impact Assessment conducted by the Ethiopian government and the findings and recommendations of the International Panel of Experts. The project is in line with international standards and recommendations of the Panel of Experts.

The most specific claim of Egypt, and the main reason for the recent impasse in the tripartite discussions between Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan, concerns the technical issues of prolongation of the filling period and guarantees over periods of drought. Every state has a sovereign right to use the resources within their territory and no form of diktat can affect this. The timing of the filling can only be reached through mutual cooperation, the result of negotiations carried out in good faith. Nothing more, nothing less.

Ethiopia is not constructing the dam for its aesthetic value; it is to bridge the gap between its ever-increasing need for power and the capacity of the state to provide it. Without provision of alternatives or payment of compensation, Egypt has no legal or moral capacity to demand an excessively prolonged period to fill the dam. As for periods of drought, no one can buy insurance policy for an Act of God. Neither Ethiopia nor Egypt has control over drought, but both have reciprocal obligations for sustainable utilization of available resources.

The force of change: #ITSMYDAM!

History teaches us that when real change arrives, the best way to deal with it is not to underestimate it or resist it, but to adapt one’s position through accommodative strategies. The world is full of compromises and excuses, give and take. The situation in Ethiopia has changed and for the better. The late Prime Minister of Ethiopia, Meles Zenawi, made it clear that Egypt should come to terms the changing circumstances and face the realities of the 21st century. No power can stop Ethiopia from unilaterally utilizing its natural resources. The changes came because the increasing population of Ethiopia, now close to 110 million people, calls for commensurate development to provide it with renewable energy. It is part of the moral and legal obligations incumbent upon the government to meet the needs of its population in the fight against poverty.
The Blue Nile is no more an orphan but a child of Ethiopia, previously neglected but now animating every citizen of Ethiopia. The NBI and the Entebbe Agreement have been the result of Ethiopia’s relentless diplomatic efforts, underlined by the national commitment to claim a fair share of the river, symbolized by the launching of the GERD in 2011. If there is anything that unifies the ruling party, opposition, and critics alike, it is the redeemed sense of justice visible in the GERD project.
 
Gerd 4
 
Why Ethiopia rejected the U.S.-drafted GERD deal

Proposed drought-mitigation mechanisms seen as designed to protect Egypt’s contested share of Nile waters. Ethiopia Insight explains the details.

Indeed, the GERD has as much symbolic as economic value. It is being built by the contributions made by all Ethiopians and as its very name underlines it is a national symbol of unity, justice and power, demonstrating Ethiopians welcome of the ‘return of their prodigal son’. The current diplomatic schism between Ethiopia and Egypt, caused by the failed negotiations, has reinvigorated the general public’s determination to support Ethiopia’s rightful claim over the Blue Nile in general and the unstoppability of the GERD project: ‘it is my Dam!’

The force of change is well supported by the international legal instruments as well. Ethiopia is not bound by outdated and irrelevant colonial treaties. Ethiopia is a sovereign state that has the right to put its natural resources to appropriate use. The only limitation under customary international law is the obligation not to cause significant trans-boundary harm—codified in Art. 2 of the Rio Declaration and upheld by international tribunals and courts here and here. Ethiopia, indeed, has firmly adhered to this principle throughout the negotiations.

Reconciling the irreconcilable

The forces of continuity and change are not mutually exclusive. They can be reconciled if the parties negotiate on the basis of their own interests, rather than mythological positions, when heading to the negotiation table. Egypt must recognise that that Ethiopia provides the lion’s share of the water that reaches Egypt, that it is using a tiny percent of its own water, and that the circumstances have fundamentally changed in the upper riparian states. Ethiopia must not deny the reliance of Egypt on the Nile River and pledge to carry out the GERD project in a manner that does not cause any significant harm downstream. This would allow real negotiations on interests and genuine cooperation would be likely.

The problem has been that Egypt has not been negotiating on the basis of interest, but rather on pre-determined positions—a typical zero-sum game. Had Egypt accepted the basic facts, shown good faith, and been ready to give up its mythical claim of exclusive ownership of the Nile River, agreement on the technical matters, who gets what and when, could easily be reached. Egypt has no right to dictate to Ethiopia how to fill the GERD reservoir but it can negotiate an acceptable outcome, offering compensatory mechanisms or incentives where appropriate. Have these been proposed? It is impossible to provide guarantees against natural disasters like drought, but if parties cooperate in good faith, they can easily work on issues to mitigate any ensuring damage. These are questions that need to be answered, if negotiations are to proceed.
 
Ethiopia does not need Egypt’s permission to start filling GERD

The Blue Nile hydropower dam has been constructed in accordance with international legal principles and Ethiopia has the right to make it operational.
The disruption in the tripartite technical discussions, and Egypt’s refusal to negotiate, have raised concerns about conflict, though no one can afford a devastating war in the 21st century, least of all when the world is being devastated by a global pandemic.

As Thucydides stated, ‘‘it is the rise of Athens and the fear that it instilled in Sparta that made the war inevitable.’’ There is no legal or scientific basis for Egypt’s ‘perceived fear’ of potentially significant harm posed by the GERD. Its claim for exclusive use of the Nile River proves nothing but the fact that ‘‘there is a sufficiency in the world for man’s need but not for man’s greed.’’ Above all, the forces of change cannot be contained or ignored. Egypt must understand that its fears are unjustified, and if it is to continue negotiations in good faith, it must stop running after outside powers or playing with ideology.

The Nile is a water resource located in Africa. The parties in dispute are members of the African Union. The solution should be African, not something dictated by the U.S. or arranged through the Arab League. The world has moved on and the solution must provide for sustainable use of the Nile water, in Egypt as in Ethiopia, a common and agreed response for a common problem.

Source=https://eritreahub.org/egypts-nile-monopoly-is-over

Thursday, 09 April 2020 22:46

Radio Dimtsi Harnnet Kassel 09.04.2020

Written by

Source: Reuters

The bank’s Africa’s Pulse report said the region’s economy will contract 2.1% to 5.1% from growth of 2.4% last year, and that the coronavirus will cost sub-Saharan Africa $37 billion to $79 billion in output losses this year due to trade and value chain disruption, among other factors.

Africa has at least 10,956 confirmed cases of the novel coronavirus, 562 deaths and 1,149 recoveries, according to a Reuters tally based on government statements and WHO data.

“The COVID-19 pandemic is testing the limits of societies and economies across the world, and African countries are likely to be hit particularly hard,” World Bank Vice President for Africa Hafez Ghanem said.

The World Bank and International Monetary Fund are racing to provide emergency funds to African countries and others to combat the virus and mitigate the impact of sweeping shutdowns aiming at curbing its spread.

The coronavirus has led to suspension of international passenger travel in many countries on the continent, and hit sectors such as tourism.

Various African governments have announced lockdowns or curfews in response to the virus, which was slow to reach many African countries but is now growing exponentially, according to the World Health Organization.

Real gross domestic product growth was projected to fall sharply particularly in the region’s three largest economies – Nigeria, Angola, and South Africa, the World Bank said.

Oil exporting-countries would also be hard-hit; while growth would likely weaken substantially in the West African Economic and Monetary Union, and the East African Community due to weak external demand, disruptions to supply chains and domestic production.

The bank said the spread of the flu-like respiratory disease also had potential to lead to a food security crisis on the continent, with agricultural production forecast to contract 2.6% and up to 7% in the event of trade blockages.

“Food imports would decline substantially (as much as 25% or as little as 13%) due to a combination of higher transaction costs and reduced domestic demand,” the bank said in a statement accompanying the report.

The institutions have also called on China, the United States and other bilateral creditors to temporarily suspend debt payments by the poorest countries so they can use the money to halt the spread of the disease and mitigate its financial impact.[nL1N2BI15A]

“There will be need for some sort of debt relief from bilateral creditors to secure the resources urgently needed to fight COVID-19 and to help manage or maintain macroeconomic stability in the region,” Cesar Calderon, the bank’s lead economist and lead author of the report, said.

The World Bank said African policymakers should focus on saving lives and protecting livelihoods by spending money to strengthen health systems and taking quick actions to minimise disruptions in food supply chains.

It also recommended social protection programmes, including cash transfers, food distribution and fee waivers, to support citizens, especially those working in the informal sector.

08 ሚያዝያ 2020

ኣብ ሓባራዊ ስራሕ ንምጽማድ፣ ንገለ ኣዋርሕ ክካየድ ዝጸንሐ ናይ መራሕቲ ፖለቲካዊ ሓይልታት መስርሕ ዘተ ኣብ ወርሒ መጋቢት 2020 ክድምደም ተመዲቡ' እንተነበረ፣ ብምስፍሕፋሕ ኮረና ቫይረስ ምክንያት እቲ ዝተሓስበ ዋዕላ ክካየድ ኣይተኻእለን። ይኩን'ምበር ምስፍሕፋሕ እዚ ለበዳ' (ኮቪድ -19) ኣብ ውሽጥን ኣብ ወጻኢን ዝርከብ ህዝብና ከውርዶ ዝክእል ብርቱዕ ሓደጋ ብምግንዛብ፡ እቲ ዘተ ክቕጽልን ሓባራዊ ተግባር ክሕወሶን ኣብ ምርድዳእ ከም ተበጽሐ ክንሕብር ንፈቱ። በዚ ምርድዳእ’ዚ መሰረት ድማ፣ ዕለት 1 ሚያዝያ 2020 "ሓባራዊ መልእክቲ ናብ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ" ከምእ’ውን ናብ ዝተፈላለያ ግብረ ስናይ ማሕበራትን፣ ዓለምለኻዊ ናይ ጥዕና ትካል ዳይረክተርን፣ ናብ ኮምሽነር ላዕለዋይ ኮሞሽን ሕቡራት ሃገራት ጉዳያ ስደተኛታትን ሓባራዊ መልእክቲን ከምዝሰደደ ዝዝከርዩ። ቀጻልነት ናይዚ ተብግሶ' ንምርጋግጽን፣ ኩሉ ደላይ ፍትሒ ኣንጻር ለበዳ ኮሮና ቫይረስ (ኮቪድ-19) ወሲድዎ ዘሎ ተበግሶ ንምድጋፍን ንምብርታዕን ኣብ ዝተፈላለየ ሜዳታት ዝተሓጋገዝ ፍሉይ ሓይሊ ዕማም ክቕውም ኣኼባ ፖለቲካዊ ሓይልታት ወሲኑ።

እዚ ብዝተፈላለያ ምንቅስቓሳትን ናይ ጥዕና ሞያውያንን ተጀሚሩ ዘሎ ተበግሶታት፣ እቲ ዝድለ ዕላማ ብግቡእ ንኽረጋገጽ እቲ ዝካየድ ዘሎ ስራሓት ክወሃሃድን ክተኣሳሰርን ይግባእ። ድሮ’ኳ እቲ ኣብ ኩሉ ኩርናዓት ዓለም ተበጊሱ ዘሎ ወፈራ፣ ዓለምለኻዊ መልክዕ ሒዙ ምህላዉ ጽቡቕ ኣብነት ኢዩ። ኣብዚ እዋንዚ ኣብ ዝተፈላለየ ሃገራት ዝነብር ኤርትራዊ ዜጋ ብስድርኡን ብህዝቡን ዘይጭነቕን ዘይሓስብን የሎን። ዓቕሙ ዝፈቕዶ ኣበርክቶ ክገብር ቅሩብ ከም ዘሎ’ውን ኩሉናንግንዘቦ ኢዩ። ስለዚ ኩሉ ጻዕርና እቲ ተበጊሱ ዘሎ ምስፋሕን ምብርታዕን፣ እቲ ዘይተበገሰ ድማ ከምዝሕወሶ ምስራሕን ክኸውን ለበዋና ነመሓላልፍ።

ጥዕና ህዝብና ንምሕላው ንተዓጠቕ !

ናጻ ኤርትራ ንዘልኣለም ትንበር! 

  1. ኤርትራዊ ሃገራዊ ባይቶ ንደሞክራስያዊ ለውጢ (ኤሃባደለ)
  2. ኤርትራዊ ሃገራዊ ግንባር (ኤሃግ)
  3. ሰልፊ ዲሞክራሲ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ (ሰዲህኤ)
  4. ውድብ ሓድነት ንዲሞክራስያዊ ለውጢ (ውሓዲለ)
  5. ውድብ ሓድነት ኤርትራውያን ንፍትሒ (ውሓኤፍ)
  6. ዲሞክራስያዊ ውድብ ዓፈር ቀይሕ ባሕሪ (ዲውዓቀባ)

 

8 أبريل 2020

كان من المقرر أن تنتهي الحوارات التي انخرطت فيها قيادات القوى السياسية لعدة أشهر بعقد ملتقى في شهر مارس الماضي. إلا أن ذلك قد تعذر بسبب انتشار جائحة كوفيد 19. وواضعين في الإعتبار ما قد يتعرض له شعبنا في الداخل والخارج من مخاطر كبيرة جراء هذا الوباء المنتشر، فقد تقرر مواصلة الحوار مصحوبًا بخطوات عملية في هذا السياق. وكانت القوى السياسية الإرترية، بناء على تلك التفاهمات، قد قامت في الأول من إبريل الجاري بتوجيه رسائل مشتركة إلى الشعب الإرتري ، فضلًا عن إرسال مذكرة موجهة إلى المنظمات الإنسانية المختلفة، ومدير منظمة الصحة العالمية، وإلى مفوض المفوضية السامية للأمم المتحدة لشؤون اللاجئين.

وللتأكيد على مواصلة هذه المبادرة. ودعمًا وتعزيزًا لجهود ومبادرات طلاب العدالة من شعبنا والهادفة إلى مكافحة جائحة كرونا (كوفيد 19)، فإن اجتماعات قيادات القوى السياسية قرر تكوين فريق عمل يساهم في مختلف المهام المتعلقة بهذه المبادرات.

ولكي تتحقق أهداف ومبتغى هذا التحرك الذي بدأ بمبادرات العاملين في الحقل الصحي، فلا بد أن يكون هناك تنسيق وتعاون بين جميع الأطراف المنخرطة في هذا العمل الإنساني النبيل. ومن المؤشرات الإيجابية لهذا التحرك أنه أصبح ينتشر في كل مكان وبدأ يأخذ طابعًا عالميًّا. وانطلاقًا من ثقتنا بأنه لا يوجد إرتري في أي مكان غير غلق على أهله وشعبه ولا يفكر بهم، وأنه على استعداد تام للقيام بما يلزم تجاههم وفق ما تسمح به إمكانياته، فإننا سنبذل كل الجهود الممكنة من أجل توسيع وتعزيز تلك المبادرات، راجين من الجميع الانخراط في هذا الجهد الوطني.

لنعمل معًا لحماية صحة شعبنا !!

لتعش إرتريا المستقلة إلى الأبد !!

  1. المجلس الوطني الإرتري للتغيير الديمقراطي
  2. الجبهة الوطنية الإرترية
  3. حزب الشعب الديمقراطي الإرتري
  4. تنظيم الوحدة من أجل التغيير الديمقراطي
  5. الاتحاد الإرتري من أجل العدالة
  6. التنظيم الديمقراطي لعفر البحر الأحمر

EPDP Magazines