Source: Al-Jazeera

Abraham T Zereby Abraham T Zere

On January 31, US President Donald Trump expanded his controversial travel ban to include Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar, Sudan, Tanzania and Nigeria [Reuters]

On January 31, US President Donald Trump expanded his controversial travel ban to include Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar, Sudan, Tanzania and Nigeria [Reuters]

MORE ON ERITREA

On January 31, US President Donald Trump expanded his controversial travel ban to include six additional countries, including my home country, Eritrea.

Reportedly, Eritrea was included in the ban for three reasons: the Eritrean government's lack of cooperation with the US in its efforts to remove Eritrean nationals living in the country without proper documentation; widespread visa overstays by Eritrean nationals; and the African country's inability to comply with the US information-sharing criteria on matters of national security and safety. 

The decision was a devastating blow for thousands of already beleaguered Eritreans. Without the possibility of seeking safety in the US, they are now left to make an impossible choice between embarking on a deadly journey towards an unwelcoming Europe, facing gross abuses in Sudan, shuttered opportunities in Ethiopia, or tolerating what passes for life in the open-air prison that is Eritrea. 

By expanding its travel ban to include Eritrean nationals, the US not only condemned thousands of innocent people to a life of oppression, uncertainty and pain, but it also signalled that it would do nothing to censor their oppressors.

Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Chad Wolf said the ban would see the United States suspend the issuance of visas that can lead to permanent residency for nationals of affected countries, but would not hinder the issuance of non-immigrant visas, such as those given to tourists, students and businesspeople.

Eritrea does not issue passports to its citizens except for in extraordinary circumstances, and most Eritreans who manage to leave the country only have refugee travel documents. This means there is almost no chance for them to score a non-immigrant visa and enter the US.

The perpetrators of repression in Eritrea, who hold official passports, however, will almost certainly be unaffected by the new travel restrictions. Politicians, military leaders and other supporters of the regime who are wreaking havoc in the country will continue to travel to the US whenever they need and want to conduct seminars, attend meetings, give music concerts, collect donations and even enjoy holidays. The new travel ban also spares holders of diplomatic passports, which means the Eritrean diplomats will be allowed to continue visiting the US and delivering their vicious propaganda. Ordinary Eritreans who have been forced to escape their homes due to the regime's flawed policies, however, will continue to suffer.

In response to the travel ban, the Eritrean Ministry of Information issued a statement, indicating that while they have no problem with the newly introduced travel restrictions on their citizens, they are disappointed with the reasoning behind them.

The government of Eritrea "has consistently opposed 'automatic asylum' and other misguided measures invoked by certain countries in the past 20 years for ulterior reasons of 'strategic depopulation' against Eritrea", the statement said, adding that it had lodged protests against previous US administrations that followed similar asylum policies. But it nevertheless criticised the Trump administration's travel ban, only because the ban does not appear to stem from the concerns repeatedly voiced by the Eritrean government, and hence sends a "negative signal" to the Eritrean leadership.

The statement all-but-proved that the Eritrean government has no intention of negotiating with the US government to help reinstate its citizens' right to travel and immigrate to the US.

Now, many Eritrean citizens' only hope is that regional powers who have strong relations with the Trump administration, such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, will intervene to help Eritreans, as they have previously done by helping lift UN sanctions on Eritrea. Without such help, Eritreans will continue to be punished both by their own government and the governments of countries that they seek asylum in, simply for the misfortune of being born in Eritrea.

Escaping repression, not posing a threat

Trump's travel ban implies that Eritrean immigrants pose a threat to the US government and its people. This, of course, could not be further from the truth. Over the years, Eritrean immigrants made invaluable contributions to American society.

Many Eritrean-American artists made significant contributions to the US cultural scene, such as Tiffany Haddish and Nipsey Hussle, whose fathers fled from war and settled in the US. Olympian medalist and "one of the most accomplished distance runners in American history," Mebrahtom "Meb" Kiflezghi, was born in Eritrea to Eritrean parents. Haben Girma, the first deaf and blind person to graduate from Harvard, who was named "White House Champion of Change" by President Obama, was born to Eritrean parents who fled war. The list of influential Americans of Eritrean origin also includes Dr Haile Debas, who was once described as a "one person transformer for global health in California, at UCSF, in America, and around the world." Colorado Congressman Joe Neguse, who has condemned the travel ban, is also the son of Eritrean immigrants.

One may argue that while Eritrean immigrants are clearly not a threat to the US, they should still be banned because they ignore US laws by overwhelmingly overstaying their visas. It is true that Eritrean immigrants are more likely than immigrants from other nations to violate their visa conditions: Overall only 1.9 percent of visitors to the US overstay their visas, while the rate among Eritrean visitors is 24 percent. But before making a judgement, it is necessary to ask some important questions: Who are these Eritreans who have overstayed their visas and why did they do so?

I can easily provide examples: I overstayed my visa. My sister, who is now a registered nurse in California, did, too. My younger brother, who is now a software engineer in the Silicon Valley, also did the same. Why did we overstay? Because we had no other option. Staying in the US was our only chance to escape repression. If we returned home when our visas expired, we'd be thrown into a dungeon. The fact that most Eritreans who overstay their visas are eventually granted asylum should be seen as confirmation that they have legitimate reasons to do so.

Caught up in indefinite transit

Since 2010, 17,564 Eritreans have resettled in the US as refugees according to the Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration.

As mentioned before, the Eritrean state rarely issues passports to its citizens and allows them to leave the country officially. As a result, almost all Eritreans who were lucky enough to resettle in the US have many family members who have been stranded in Eritrea. The dreams of all these people of one day reuniting with their relatives in the US have been crushed by the Trump administration's new extended travel ban.

The 2018 peace deal with Ethiopia and the resulting easing of border restrictions had renewed many Eritreans' hopes for leaving the country and joining their loved ones in the West. The US's very long and convoluted vetting process for issuing family reunification visas, however, made this almost impossible for many. As the US embassy in Asmara stopped issuing immigrant visas, many who want to immigrate to the US moved to neighbouring countries to complete the process. Now, they are stranded in limbo indefinitely, as they do not want to return to Eritrea and continue living under unbearable oppression.

Trump's travel ban also devastated Eritrean nationals in the US, like me, who were hoping to be reunited with their family members. As they do not have a government acting on their behalf and fighting for their rights, they do not know where to seek help. Following the announcement of the extended ban, I have no idea when and if I will be able to see my mother, who is still in Eritrea, again.

While facing tremendous external challenges, the Eritrean regime seems to care very little about improving conditions inside the country, something that's been the case for a very long time. Eritreans continue to flee their country at an alarming rate. Those left in the country face mounting challenges with little hope for improvement or redress.

I thought I had escaped from a repressive regime that retaliates against families for others' perceived wrongdoing. Yet, the sad, familiar story has followed me and many of my countrymen/women. Now I must figure out how to explain to my daughter and nieces - who are Americans - why their government banned them from seeing their grandparents

February 13, 2020 News

For some time now it has been clear that Eritreans are finding it increasingly difficult to escape the dictatorship and make and new life for themselves by travelling to Europe.

Once this was possible. But the evidence is mounting that Eritrean refugees find the route blocked. Some are trapped in extremely dangerous detention centres in Libya, but overall the flow of asylum seekers is drying up.

These statistics are from Frontex – the EU’s official border guards.

They are for the numbers using what Frontex calls the Central Mediterranean Route

2015        2016         2017        2018

38,791     20,721      7,055       3,529

The figure for 2018 is one tenth of what it was just four years earlier.

The UN refugee agency, UNHCR, produced data which bears out this trend.

It can be seen here.

Screenshot 2020-02-13 at 11.21.01

Screenshot 2020-02-13 at 11.21.38

This is a trend that has been developing since 2016 – if not earlier.

Lower numbers are leaving Eritrea

Eritrea has been described as one of the world’s fastest emptying nations. The widely quoted estimate – first stated by the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Eritrea in 2012 – is that 4,000 to 5,000 Eritreans are leaving their country every month. Since then, this number has been quoted in numerous articles and reports. This includes a 2014 study by the RMMS, which tried to shed more light on this estimate by exploring the ‘ jigsaw’ of numbers from different sources and concluded that, although plausible, the number could be slightly overestimated.

One explanation for the lower number of Eritrean arrivals in Italy in 2016, could be that indeed lower numbers have been leaving Eritrea in 2016 compared to the years before. Earlier in 2016, RMMS reported on a deterioration of the living conditions in Eritrea. Reduced purchasing power and reduced access to cash from remittance flows could have limited the ability of many to fund migration.

As I warned three years ago: Europe’s “wall” across the Mediterranean is almost complete.

Africa

Source: Bloomberg

Why Ghana Is Africa’s Top Candidate for an Economic Leap

The country scores high on development metrics; it just needs to break free of dependence on commodities.

10 February 2020, 00:00 GMT
Noah Smith is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. He was an assistant professor of finance at Stony Brook University, and he blogs at Noahpinion.

Every time a region of the world goes from being poor to being rich one country tends to be responsible for getting the process started. In Europe that was the U.K., which was the first to industrialize. In East Asia it was Japan. In West Africa it could be Ghana.

Ghana has a number of big advantages over other countries in the region in terms of geography, institutions and human capital. It’s on the coast and has plenty of ports that can be used to ship and receive goods. With about 31 million people, it has a large enough population to create a substantial domestic market but small enough that providing jobs and food won’t be too insurmountable of a challenge.

Members of the Akan ethnic group make up about half of the population, meaning that Ghana has less of the ethnic fragmentation plaguing many post-colonial states. It scores well on international indicators of governance quality, freedomdemocracy, ease of doing business and corruption. Ghana has lower child mortality than its neighbors, indicating a relatively healthy populace. It also has a head start in terms of literacy rates and education:

The Education Advantage

Mean years of education by country

Screenshot 2020-02-10 at 08.39.37

Source: Our World in Data

These advantages have helped to make Ghana one of the fastest-growing countries on the continent. Although its 2019 growth rate ended up being only 7% rather than the world-beating 8.8% forecast by the International Monetary Fund, that is still very solid growth.

But to become the Japan of West Africa, Ghana is going to have to undergo a structural transformation. The country’s main exports are all commodities:

Too Dependent on Commodities

Share of Ghana’s exports in 2018

Screenshot 2020-02-10 at 08.39.54

Source: World Top Exports

Specializing in commodities is not necessarily a economic death sentence for a nation. Ghana doesn’t have the resource endowment of Norway or Saudi Arabia, but with wise and stable policy it could aspire to the comfortable middle-income status of Namibia, Botswana or perhaps even Chile.

Indeed, Ghana in recent decades has done a good job of moving in this direction. Agricultural productivity has increased, which allowed many Ghanaians to move from farms to cities, where they have been mostly employed in the service sector. This has been a typical pattern in a number of commodity-rich developing countries. In a 2016 paper, economists Douglas Gollin, Remi Jedwab and Dietrich Vollrath found:

In countries that are heavily dependent on resource exports, urbanization appears to be concentrated in “consumption cities” where the economies consist primarily of non-tradable services.

But the service sector isn’t great at creating secure, well-paying jobs. Much of this employment is informal and precarious. And a large share of the gains from the commodity boom have flowed to the wealthy, worsening inequality. Gollin and his co-authors find that the residents of so-called consumption cities do considerably worse than residents of cities with economies based on manufacturing.

But when a country is strong in natural resource industries, it can be hard to ignite the kind of manufacturing boom that countries such as South Korea rode from rags to riches. Strong commodity exports raise the value of a country’s exchange rate, making manufactured exports more expensive. They also make wages in the industrial sector uncompetitive.

This helps explain why Ghana’s laudable efforts to switch to manufacturing haven’t yet borne fruit. The country tried establishing export-oriented special economic zones similar to those of China. But these ended up specializing in commodities rather than manufacturing.

Ghana needs to keep trying. One idea is to provide subsidies specifically to manufactured exports. If these subsidies were stable, reliable, large and long-lasting, they might tilt the balance of comparative advantage. This could include subsidizing wages for workers in export-oriented manufacturing; that would allow workers to earn a decent living while factory investors save on costs.

It could also mean providing export-oriented factories with cheap dedicated sources of electric power, because generation has been a problem in Ghana. That would help make the country more attractive to investors from China, as well as a place where domestic entrepreneurs can flourish. Taking in skilled immigrants, especially from nearby Nigeria or the African diaspora, could also help build a pool of expertise that makes the country an attractive destination for investment.

The raw materials for a Ghanaian manufacturing boom are there. The country has entrepreneurial and innovative talent, as demonstrated by the introduction a few years ago of the first Ghana-made car. And both China and other industrialized nations are clearly interested in Ghana as a production base for the burgeoning West African market. To get there, the country’s leaders will simply have to refuse to be satisfied with the recent boom driven by commodities and urbanization. Ghana has enjoyed great success; sustaining that progress will require a new model.

February 9, 2020 News

The death is reported of Shewit Yacob, son of fighters and disabled veterans, killed on 04 February 2020 in the centre of Mendefera.

Screenshot 2020-02-09 at 10.46.08

This was in accordance with President Isaias’s ‘shoot to kill’ policy.

This happened in the very area where the EU road project is taking place, using national service conscripts trapped in slave labour.

Screenshot 2020-02-09 at 10.46.23

ወዲ ስውእ ተጋዳላይን ስንክልቲ ተጋዳሊትን ዝኾነ መንእሰይ ሸዊት ያቆብ በቲ ተኩስካ ቅተል ዝብል መምርሒ ኢሳያስ ኣፈወርቂ ኣብ ማእከል ከተማ መንደፈራ ብዕለት 4 ለካቲት 2020 ብግፍዒ ተረሺኑ

መንእሰይ ሽዊት ያቆብ ብዕለት 25 ግንቦት 1993፥ ካብ ኣብኡ ስውእ ተጋዳላይ ያቆብ ገብረትንሳኤን ካብ ኣዲኡ ስንክልቲ ተጋዳሊት ጸጋ ገብረሂወት ተወልደ።

ዕድሚኡ ንትምህርቲ ምስ ኣኸለ ናይ መባእታ ትምህርቲ ኣብ ከተማ መንደፈራ ጀሚሩ፥ ናይ ካልኣይ ደረጃ ትምህርቱ ድማ ኣብ ቤት ትምህርቲ ሳንጆርጆ ዓዲ ወግሪ ስጋዕ 11 ክፍሊ ተማሂሩ ናይ 12 ክልተ ደረጃ ትምህርቱ ንምውዳእ ብ2011/2012 ዓመተ ትምህርቲ ኣብ መበል 25 ዙርያ ንሳዋ ወረደ።

ኣብኡ ናይ 12 ክፍሊ ደረጃ ትምህርትን ወታደራዊ ስልጠናን ብምጥቕላል፥ ናብ ላዕለዋይ ደረጃ ከሕልፍ ዘኽእል ነጥቢ ስለዘይረኸበ፥ ናይ ሃገራዊ ኣገልግሎት፥ ኣባል ሓይሊ ባሕሪ ኮይኑ፥ ናብቲ ኣብ ዓሰብ ዝርከብ ጨንፈር ሓይሊ ባሕሪ ተመዲቡ ኔሩ።

ኣብቲ ዝተመደበሉ ንገለ ዓመታት ከገልግል ድሕሪ ምጽናሕ ንስንክልቲ ኣዲኡን ንምንኣስ ሓውን ንምርኣይ ናብ መንደፈራ ንዕረፍቲ መጸ። እንተኾነ ህሉው ኩነታት መነባብሮ ናይ ስድርኡ ኣዝዩ ስለዘሻቐሎን ስለዘጨነቆን ብዓቕሙ ክገብሮ ዝኽእል ንኽገብር፥ እቲ ዝነበሮ ብጊዜ ደረት ዘይብሉ ኣገልግሎት ራሕሪሑ፥ ስድራቤቱ ክናብይ ወሰነ።

ከም ውጽኢቱ ድማ፥ ኣብ እንዳ ፋጉሮ ምዓልታዊ ስራሕ እንዳሰርሕ ብዝረኽቦ ኣታዊ ንስድራ ቤቱ ክናብይ ጸኒሑ። ብዕለት 4 ለካቲት 2020፥ ሸዊት ከም ኩለን ዝሓለፍ ምዓልታት ንጉሆ ተሲኡ ናብ ስርሑ ወፈረ። ናይ ስራሕ ሰዓታት ኣኺሉ ምስተፈደሰ ድማ፥ ገዛ ቅድሚ ምእታው ምስ ገለ መሳትኡን የዕርኹቱን፥ ኣብ ውሽጢ መንደፈራ ኣብ እትርከብ ሓንቲ ቤት ሻሂ ንሓዳር ጊዜ ድሕሪ ምጽናሕ፥ ካብታ ቤት ሻሂ ምስ የዕሩኽቱ ከወጽእ ከሎ ምስቶም ኣብቲ ከተማ መንእሰያት ክገፍ ላዕልን ታሕትን ክብሉ ዘምሰዩ፥ ኣባላት ምክልኻል ስለዝተራኸበ፥ ብኡ ንቡኡ ምስ ዓርኩ ተታሒዙ፥ ኣብ ኣእዳዎም ፌሮ የእትዮም እንዳኸብከቡዎም ከለው፥ መንእሰይ ሸዊት ምስ ዓርኩ ክሃድሙ ፈቲኖም ካብቶም ሓለውቶም ብዝተተኮሰ ጥይት ልክዕ ስዓት ትሽዓተ ናይ ምሽት ህይወት መንእሰይ ሸዊት ሓለፈት።

መንእሰይ ሽዊት ክሳብ እቲ ኣገልግሎት ጠንጢኑ ስድራቤት ክናብይ ዝጀመረሉ ስዓት ንሃገሩ ብቅንዕናን ብተኣማንነትን ኣገልጊሉ እዩ። ብጀካ እዚ ካብ ክልተ ተጋደልቲ ኣቦን ኣደን ዝተወልደ ኤርትራዊ መንእሰይ እዩ።

መንእሰይ ሽዊት ስነስርዓት ቀብሩ ብዕለት 6 ለካቲት 2020፥ ፍርቂ ምዓልቲ ሓመድ ለቢሱ።

እዚ ጨካን ስርዓት ብተመልከተለይ ናይ ንጹሃት ዜጋታት ክቡር ህይወት ክቐዝፍ ካብ ዝጀምር ብዙሕ ዓመት ኮይኑ እዩ። ብኸምዚ ዝዓይነቱ ዘይሓላፍነታዊ ተግባር ናይ ዝጥፍእ ህይወታት ኤርትራውያን ንሂወት መንእሰይ ሸዊት ወሲካ ቁጽሩ ውሑድ ክኸውን ከምዘይክእል ፍሉጥ እዩ።

ሕልፈት መንእሰይ ሸዊት ኣብ ማእከል ከተማ ኣብ ቅድሚ ህዝቢ ስለዝኾነ ድኣ እዩ ክፍለጥ ክኢሉ እንበር፥ ኣብ ኩለን ዶባት ሃገርና በዚ ከርፋሕ መነባብሮ ናይዚ ስርዓት፥ እሱ ደስዓቦ ግዱድ ባርነት ኣንጸርጺሮም እግሮም ናብ ዝመርሖም ካብ ዝፈትውዎም ስድርኦምን ሃገሮምን ሃጽ ኢሎም ክጠፍኡ እናፈተኑ በዚ ተኩስካ ቅተል ዝብል ኣረሜናዊ ፖሊስ ናይዚ ስርዓት ኣብ ዶባት ብተመልከተለይ ዝትቐዝፈን ሬስኦም ሓመድ ከይለበሰ ቀለብ ኣራዊት ዝኾኑ ዕሸላት መንእሰያት ኣዲኦም ትቑጸሮም።

እግዚኣብሄር ንመንእሰይ ሽዊት ያቆብን ንኹሎም ብተመሳሳሊ መገዲ ህይወቶም ዝሓለፍ ኤርትራውያን ኣምላኽ ኣብ ገነቱ ይቀበሎም።

ንስድራቤት መዋቲ ድማ ጽንዓት ይሃቦም!

ፍትሒ ንዝተበደሉ፥ ጉቡእ መቕጻእቲ ድማ ንበደልቲ ስጋዕ ዝረጋገጽ፥ ቃልስና ክቕጽል እዩ።

ኤልሳ ጭሩም
8 ለካቲት 2020

Summary by Makeda Saba

President-Isaias-Afwerki-Interview-2

 Yesterday (07.02.2020) EriTV broadcast an interview with President Isaias (Eritrean President Isaias Afwerki Interview Part 1 (February 7, 2020) | EastAFRO.com) .  According to East.Afro.com– this is part 1 and part 2 is expected to be broadcast Sunday 09.02.2020.

In line with the style that President Isaias has established for himself this is not an interview it is more like a 2.5-hour lecture that the 2 reporters are required to listen to sitting ramrod straight.

The interview is noteworthy for what is does NOT cover in 2.5 hours:

Political Reform in Eritrea:

o   Constitution implementation

o   Recall of the National Assembly

o   Demobilisation Strategy

o   End of Grade 12 in Sawa

o   Release of political prisoners, prisoners of conscience

o   The role of Abraham Afwerki in the Government of Eritrea

o   Presence of UAE and Saudi military bases in Assab

Economic Reform in Eritrea:

o   Strategy for independent small business

o   Youth employment (free from National Service)

o   Food security – the high level of malnutrition of Eritrean children

o   Financial Reforms

o   Etc.

Progress on Ethiopia Eritrea peace process and specifically:

o   The Economic and Security arrangement –

o   Ethiopia access to Massawa and Assab

o   Road connection with Ethiopia

o   Etc…

President Isaias interview is focused on:

o Ethiopia

o UNHCR continued  facilitation of Eritrean Refugees

o How South Sudan should never have separated from Sudan

o Sudan

Ethiopia

According to President Isaias:

There never was a border dispute with Ethiopia, the war was orchestrated by TPLF Junta, bolstered up by External Henchmen to further their agenda. “ (https://twitter.com/samueltukue/status/1225924576661602304?s=20 )

“…. The main spoiler in Ethiopia is still the TPLF Gang. Ethiopians need to make the right choice. Thinking they can change the mindset of the TPLF is futile. They particularly need to be aware of the motives of outsiders.” (https://twitter.com/samueltukue/status/1225926539537256449?s=20 ) In this case I note that he is not considering Eritrea or the Eritrean Government as one of the interfering  ‘outsiders’ that Ethiopia  has to be aware of.

“…. TPLF, even as it finds itself immersed in total bankruptcy, has and continues to engage in an act of an all-out destructiveness. This should not derail Eritrea and Ethiopia from the path of peace, solidarity and prosperity.” (https://twitter.com/samueltukue/status/1225935090267643906?s=20 )

The President refers to the Ethnic Federalism in Ethiopia as led by a narrow group (i.e. TPFL) as bankrupt and in need of reform he states: “We call it game over, and the Ethiopians have said enough.” He refers to the TPLF as the impediment   finalising the issue of the Bademe border. He is of the view that the TPLF continues to be threat for Eritrea, it is working to divide Eritrean along ethnic lines and it continues to build refugee camps for Eritrean, and to collaborate with UNHCR to entice Eritrean youth out of the country, contributing to the brain drain of the country. He accuses the TPLF for the continued failure to finalise the issue of Bademe.

In a report – Eritrea: National Service, exit and entry (https://drc.ngo/media/5624986/country_report_eritrea_2020.pdf) -   reports that  according to their  sources the Eritrean Government  considers the:

Other sources suggest that the Eritrean government is reluctant to demobilise conscripts from national service because of external concerns. These concerns are related to the Tigray region in Ethiopia and the Muslim Brotherhood in Sudan. According to five Western Diplomats, it is a concert for the Eritrean leadership how the ruling party in the Tigray regional state, TPLF will react to the new situation following peace agreement. TPLF is perceived to be a state within the state and will not necessarily follow the federal government of Ethiopia.”

IGAD and Regional influence

Following  recent meeting between PM Abiy, President of Somalia Foramajo and President Isaias the three leaders agreed to work towards  regional integration a Horn of Africa coalition  referred to as a ‘Cushitic Alliance ‘ (https://www.theeastafrican.co.ke/news/africa/Eritrean-president-floats-regional-bloc-idea---/4552902-5441802-12c3n3z/index.html)  .

According to the Garowe ONLINE editorial (https://www.theeastafrican.co.ke/news/africa/Eritrean-president-floats-regional-bloc-idea---/4552902-5441802-12c3n3z/index.html) the three leaders indicated that they  may invite other partners to the Alliance  and though these were not names it is likely : “…..[these] will come from the neighbourhood , meaning Djibouti, Sudan, South Sudan …… [or] even countries from  across the Arabian Peninsula.”

Such a coalition would overlap extensively with the role presently exercised by IGAD an institution that President Isaias want to replace and which, in his interview, he refers to as a: “. puppet organisation …. remotely controlled by global powers…

Summary

During the interview President Isaias explains that given the ethnic divisions and conflict in Ethiopia, it is not possible for Eritrea to stand by and do nothing.

February 7, 2020 News

Screenshot 2020-02-07 at 12.26.43

Source: UNICEF Report

Eritrea drought, malnutrition and choleraThis is truly shocking.

UNICEF has classified over 60% of Eritrean children under 5 as being “stunted, wasted or underweight.” To put it bluntly – they are close to starvation.

  • Worse than children in Zimbabwe, where half the population are going hungry.
  • Worse than South Sudan, where children are suffering from years of civil war, and just one MSF hospital received 1,000 malnourished children in 2019.
  • Worse than Mozambique, struggling to recover from hurricanes and conflict.

Any self-respecting government would resign if UNICEF produced a report showing this level of suffering.

But President Isaias Afwerki does nothing: all is well. Just keep quiet about the reality of childhood malnutrition.

February 6, 2020 News

In an under-reported visit, Prime Minister Netanyahu has been in Sudan and Uganda, mending fences and possibly preparing the ground for expelling African asylum seekers now living in Israel.

This is the view of Ha’aretz, which wrote this story: “Warming Israeli-Sudanese Relations Worry Asylum Seekers Waiting for Refugee Status. Netanyahu’s comments have shaken up community of 6,000 Sudanese in Israel, fearing their lives could be upended.”

Eritreans may also face deportation to either Sudan or Uganda.


Source: Al-Monitor

Netanyahu’s Africa blitz: photo-ops and pleasing the US

ARTICLE SUMMARY
Israeli diplomats fear that the drive for cooperation projects with African countries is being replaced by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s desire for photo-ops and by hints that relations with Jerusalem would open the door to Washington.

Sudan reported Feb. 2 that Washington had invited head of its Sovereign Council Gen. Abdel Fattah al-Burhan for a visit. The following day, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visited Uganda, secretly meeting there with Burhan. After the meeting, Netanyahu announced proudly to the world that Israel and Sudan, two enemy countries, agreed to work together toward normalizing ties. A statement issued by Netanyahu’s office noted that the prime minister believed the current Sudanese regime is headed in a new positive direction, and that he had also expressed this view to US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. “Burhan is eager to help his country modernize by taking it out of isolation and putting it on the world’s map,” the statement read.

Indeed, Netanyahu’s diplomatic blitz was applauded not just in Jerusalem, but also in Washington. Pompeo praised both countries, congratulating Burhan on “his leadership in normalizing ties with Israel.” In Sudan, on the other hand, things looked a bit different, with the government cautiously noting that Burhan informed no one and consulted no one before taking off to Uganda. Clearly, the road to normalizing ties between Khartoum and Jerusalem is not going to be as smooth as presented by Netanyahu in Kampala.

Israel and Sudan have a turbulent past, with two issues at the crux of animosity: Iran and the conflict with the Palestinians. Back in January 2009, mysterious fighter jets attacked an Iranian arms convoy in the Sudanese desert. In April that year, an Iranian vessel laden with arms bound for the Gaza Strip was torpedoed off the coast of Sudan. Khartoum suspected that Israel was behind the attacks, in an attempt to thwart arms smuggling into Gaza. The toppling of Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir in April 2019 changed the country’s priorities, with its new leaders distancing themselves from Tehran. But what exactly do the current leaders in Khartoum expect from Israel?

Over the past decade, Netanyahu has invested much efforts in cultivating Israeli ties with African states, or in his own words, “bringing Israel back to Africa.” He had stated on numerous occasions that Africa is part of Israel’s list of diplomatic priorities. Netanyahu made no secret of the fact that he was hoping to change the balance of power within the United Nations through this African campaign. He argued that Israel needs the African countries on its side in its UN battles against the Palestinians. Still, he kept noting that his African efforts embodied Israel’s long-term vision of showcasing its commitment to share with others its best practices and technologies in fields that include smart agriculture, water management, high-tech and health innovation.


Bribes, Bombs and Saudi Billionaires: The Secret History of Israel’s Explosive Relations With Sudan

Source: Ha’aretz

Netanyahu wants Sudan to join the ‘friends of Israel’ club of Sunni Arab states. The Mossad, with Saudi help, has tried that before

Yossi Melman

Feb 05, 2020 3:51 PM

The meeting Monday in Uganda between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, head of Sudan’s transitional Sovereignty Council, is just another chapter in the convoluted history of the two countries. It is a story of ups and downs, war, expedience, animosity, gun-running and people-smuggling, conspiracies, the long reach of Iran, clandestine bank transfers and – above all – a relationship wrapped in overlapping layers of secrecy.

The opening chapter in that history was written in the first half of the 1950’s. Sudan was negotiating its independence from the joint British and Egyptian government, known as the “condominium,” which had ruled since 1899.

Sudan’s major opposition, the Umma party, feared that Egyptian president Gamal Abdul Nasser, keep to concretize his ideology of pan-Arabism ideology, and his ambitions for leadership of Africa and the Arab world, would try to bloc Sudan’s independence, in coordination with those Sudanese nationalists who favored unification with Egypt.

Umma’s representatives, led by Sadiq al-Mahdi – who, 30 years later would become Sudan’s prime minister – met secretly in London with Israeli diplomats, among them Mordechai Gazit, then the first secretary of the London embassy. The Sudanese emissaries sought the diplomatic and, if possible, economic assistance of Israel, a sworn enemy of Egypt.

In January 1956, Sudan gained its independence and was recognized by both the UK and Egypt. The task of maintaining the clandestine encounters with Israel, which continued for a few years, was transferred from Israel’s Foreign Ministry to the Mossad.

From the beginning, Sudanese-born Nissim Gaon, an Israeli-Swiss international businessman, played an important role in facilitating relations between Israel and Sudan, with an emphasis on economic ties. Over the years Israel benefited from Gaon’s investments and experience in the tourism and hotel industries.

The honeymoon in the relations between the two countries was cut short at the end of the 1950’s. A military coup d’état – one of several to come – and Nasser’s beguiling spell turned Sudan into Israel’s adversary. Sudan even sent a small military contingent to assist Egypt in the Six Day War of June 1967, and for the next decade there were no bilateral encounters, not even clandestine ones.

With this reality in mind, Israel replayed the old dictum of my enemy’s enemy is my friend, and set to work to build secret ties with forces in opposition to the Sudanese government. Mossad operatives, led by David Ben Uziel, better known as “Tarzan,” infiltrated Sudan in 1969. Their mission was to help the South Sudanese tribes fighting against the central government in Khartoum.

Using air strips and bases in Uganda and Kenya, Israeli air force pilots dropped ammunition and weapons to assist the rebel forces of General Joseph Lago, who also traveled to Israel and met with Prime Minister Golda Meir. On the ground, “Tarzan” and his team, together with Lago’s troops, walked hundreds of kilometers in the bush, bombing bridges on the Nile and ambushing Sudanese soldiers.

The civil war ended in the mid 1970’s – but it wasn’t the end of Israel’s involvement. Instructed by Prime Minister Menachem Begin, Mossad and Israeli navy personnel smuggled Ethiopian Jews to Promised Land, using that accumulated knowledge and experience of the terrain. Risking their lives and working alongside with Israelis of Ethiopian origins, they devised a highly daring plan, which eventually had two phases.

The first, between 1977 and 1980 and codenamed “Operation Brothers,” used Israeli boats to rescue Ethiopian Jews picked up from Sudan’s Red Sea coast. To enhance the operation, the Mossad registered a front company in Europeand rebuilt a defunct diving resort. With Mossad operatives masquerading as diving instructors, the resort served as a command and control center. In this way 17,500 Jews were brought to Israel – yet it was achieved at a slow pace, and it could not be scaled up.

So in 1981, Defense Minister Ariel Sharon met secretly in Kenya with Sudanese leader General Jaffar al-Numeiri. Sharon, with the help of Israeli businessman Yaacov Nimrodi, former Mossad operative Dave Kimchi, and Saudi billionaire Adnan Khashoggi (acting quasi-independently of the Saudi authorities), plotted to turn Sudan into a depot for weapons intended for use to overthrow Ayatollah Khomeini’s relatively young regime in Iran.

The scheme called for Israel to send weapons to Sudan, financed by Khashoggi (both Khashoggi and Nimrodi foresaw tidy commissions.) Numeiri would receive a generous payoff. The deposed Shah’s son would be installed as Iran’s new ruler. Another goal was to divert some of the weapons to foment a rebellion in Chad, and country that could boast uranium mines of strategic interest, that would result in an Israel-friendly government.

But Sharon and his plotters were conspiring behind the back of the Mossad. When Mossad chiefs Yitzhak Hofi and Nahum Admoni learnt about the plan, they first complained to Begin and then they killed it.

Three years later, in 1984, the Mossad proved its strength once again. It decided to adapt once again the modus operandi for the emigration of the Ethiopian Jews. Thanks to bribes given to both Sudanese leader General Jaafar al-Numeiri and Omar Abu Taib, his security agency head, they agreed to turn a blind eye. Those 30 million dollars – donated by the American Joint Distribution Committee, the largest global Jewish welfare organization – lubricated the establishment of a new stage in smuggling out Ethiopia’s Jews.

The Ethiopian Jews were taken at night to Khartoum airport, and flown by “Trans European Airways” to Israel via Brussels. The company was owned by George Gutelman, a Belgium Jew who was more than happy to help the Mossad. Ephraim Halevy, later Mossad head, was in charge: It was called “Operation Moses.” Ironically the main business of Gutelman’s airline – a charter company offering low-cost flights -was to ferry Muslim pilgrims to Mecca.

In executing Operation Moses, the Mossad was assisted by the CIA. This way an additional 30,000 Ethiopian Jews were brought to Israel. But the airlift played a part of the downfall of the Numeiri regime, which was accused of collaborating with Israel. For a short time, Numeiri was replaced by Israel’s old friend, Sadiq al-Mahdi.

Soon, another military coup d’état took place in Khartoum and brought General Omar al-Bashir to power in 1989. Deeply influenced by a charismatic Muslim cleric called Hassan Tourabi, the duo controlled Sudan and turned it into a military theocracy. Osama bin Laden found sanctuary in Sudan from 1990 to 1996. And Sudan formed strong ties with Iran.

The result was that Sudan allowed its territory to be used as a transit point and storage facility for weapons smuggled by Iran’s Qods Force to Hamas in Gaza.

Israel couldn’t watch from the sidelines. From 2009 onward the Mossad – providing information – and Israel’s air force retaliated with a series of air strikes against boats and trucks carrying Iranian weapons and on arms depots on Sudanese soil.

In the last decade, the Sudan-Israel rollercoaster has turned and twisted on. General Bashir was declared a war criminal by the International Criminal Court for his part in perpetrating genocide in the Darfur region and in south Sudan. Sudanese refuges escaping the atrocities hoped to find shelter in Israel; treated as asylum-seekers in only the most formalistic manner, almost none were recognized as refugees, and now Netanyahu and his rightwing cabinet hope the conditions are right to deport them.

South Sudan, which suffered so much, declared its independence, and promptly began to purchase weapons from Israel – and in another historical irony, it, too, embarked on a civil war and perpetrated its own atrocities.

And General al-Bashir’s attraction to Iran waned, and with it, sprung the seeds of a renewed relationship with Israel. Bashir betrayed Iran, and befriended Saudi Arabia, solidifying his reorientation by sending Sudanese troops to fight in the civil war in Yemen – which partly functions as a proxy war between Iran and Saudi Arabia – in return for Saudi money and oil.

Encouraged by the last five years of Saudi Arabia’s burgeoning openness towards the Jewish state, Bashir started to flirt with Israel. He had deeply expedient reasons: he hoped that Netanyahu and the Mossad would be able to leverage the political clout of AIPAC and U.S. Jewish organizations to cleanse him of his crimes, to rehabilitate his reputation, in return for forming diplomatic relations with Israel.

According to foreign reports, in the twilight years of al-Bashir’s rule, Mossad chief Yossi Cohen met with his Sudanese counterpart General Salah Goshfor initial discussions on some form of trade and diplomatic relations between the two countries.

But Sudan’s domestic unrest and a long-pent up wave of opposition to his rule stood in his way. By then, the Mossad knew he was a dead horse, and his days in power numbered. He was finally deposed in April, 2019.

Now, with al-Bashir gone, the conditions could be ripe for a renaissance of relations between Jerusalem and Khartoum. With a tail wind from U.S. President Donald Trump and various Gulf states, Netanyahu’s government has quietly but eagerly renewed its efforts to turn Sudan into another regional Sunni Arab state friendly to Israel. For the time being, Israel’s immediate request is small, and mundane: to allow Israeli planes to over fly over Sudan’s airspace.

It won’t be an easy ride: Sudan’s political opposition challenged al- Burhan’s stance the moment news of his meeting leaked out; they accused him of cooperating with the “enemy,” while the country’s civilian leadership claimed that they had not been notified about the meeting in advance at all. Al-Burhan deflected the criticism with the all-purpose reasoning that he met with Netanyahu for the benefit and welfare of the Sudanese people – emphasizing that the détente does not diminish his support for the Palestinians.

Netanyahu’s immediate political concern was to grab headlines to enhance his pre-election prestige. Indeed, former defense minister Moshe Ya’alon, a leader of the anti-Netanyahu opposition, argued that Israel’s national interests would have been better served by keeping the meeting secret and not publicizing it for short-term domestic political gains.

Clearly the bigger prize would be to open formal trade and diplomatic ties. It is certainly still a defense and security win that the leader of a state as overtly hostile as Sudan was, only a few years ago, has divested from Iran and Hamas, and is interested, however cautiously,in accommodation with Israel.

Netanyahu likes to say it’s another clear sign of how the Middle East’s geopolitics are changing. The jagged and inconsistent history of relations between Israel and Sudan suggests this particular change might not be so smooth, or sustained.

January 29, 2020 News

Source: Businessweek

The United Kingdom and Somaliland are seeking ways with which they can partner to improve security in the Horn by building the capacity of the defence forces.
AFRICA INDUSTRY

UK Seeking Working Relationship With Somaliland On Military Matters

The United Kingdom and Somaliland are seeking ways with which they can partner to improve security in the Horn by building the capacity of the defence forces.

The newly appointed defence attaché at the United Kingdom Embassy for Somalia/Somaliland, Lt Col Huan Davies has been in Somaliland where he held talks with high ranking military personnel of the country and officials of the ministry of defence.

Lieutenant-Colonel Davies met with the Somaliland Defense Minister, Abdiqani Mohamoud Atteeye, and the Army Chief of Staff, Major-General Nouh Tani, with whom he discussed defence matters of mutual concern and the strengthening of ties between the two sides besides an update of progress on programmes implemented.

On the other hand, The Somaliland officials have appreciated UKAID support for defence sector delivered by Axiom and the UK office in Hargeisa.

Axiom International is implementing a capacity building programme in Somaliland on behalf of the UK Government. Ultimately the objective is to increase stability and security in Somaliland.

Sources close to the deliberation stated that the Attaché is following up on several security-related projects the United Kingdom partners with national agencies and security branches which cover defence issues, training, capacity-building, provision of basic supplies indispensable to peace and stability and the rule of law.

Somaliland which remains internationally unrecognized has an army which has played a vital role in the security of the horn of Africa which previously was a hub of pirates.

Somaliland has severally expressed an interest in hosting British and Russian naval bases, which would add to an already active military presence along the coast of the Red Sea – one of the world’s busiest and most strategically important maritime passages.

Last January, the then British Defense Secretary Gavin Williamson paid an unannounced visit to Somaliland and met with President Muse Bihi Abdi, Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Yasin Hagi Mohamoud, and Defense Minister Essa Ahmed as well as Nuh Ismail Tani, a top army general.

In 1991, the Horn of Africa territory of Somaliland seceded from Somalia, which had itself gained independence from Britain in 1960. But for the past 28 years, Somaliland has remained officially unrecognized as a country – a status it resents.

Russia has also previously announced its intention to set up a naval base in Saylac, Somaliland while the United Arab Emirates is also building a military base in Berbera which includes a coastal-surveillance system.

February 3, 2020 News

Source: Ha’aretz

Netanyahu Heading to Uganda to Meet Regional Leaders

Israel currently deports asylum seekers to Uganda ■ Reports in recent years said Israel may renew ties with Muslim nations in Africa

Yoweri Museveni and Benjamin Netanyahu at the Entebbe airport in Uganda on July 4, 2016.

REUTERS/Presidential Press Unit/Handout via REUTERS

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu set out on Monday morning for a one-day visit to Uganda, where he is expected to meet with leaders of other African countries.

“I am setting out for another visit to Africa, my fifth in three and a half years,” Netanyahu stated. “Israel is making a big return to Africa, and Africa has already returned to Israel. These are important ties politically, economically and in terms of security,” he said, adding that he hopes to have good news upon his return.

In July 2016, the prime minister participated in a ceremony in Uganda to mark the 40th anniversary of Operation Entebbe, a hostage rescue by Israeli commandos at Entebbe Airport in 1976. The operation, which aimed to rescue 106 passengers of an Air France flight that was hijacked by members of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, succeeded in freeing 102 of the hostages. Netanyahu’s brother Yonatan, who led the mission, was killed.

During the 2016 visit, Netanyahu met Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni, Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta, Rwandan President Paul Kagame, South Sudan President Salva Mayardit, then-Ethiopian Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn Boshe, Zambian President Edgar Lungu and former Tanzanian Foreign Minister Augustine Mahiga.

It has also been reported that in the past, Israel contacted the American administration and other foreign governments in an attempt to encourage them to improve their relations with Sudan and to make overtures in its favor, in light of the severance of ties between the Arab-African country and Iran.

Reports in Israel and abroad in recent years have said that Israel might renew its diplomatic relations with several Muslim countries on the African continent, including Mali, Niger and Sudan. After Netanyahu visited Chad in 2019, it was reported that Israel was working to formalize ties with Sudan, and Israeli officials spoke  about it publicly on several occasions, especially after the ouster of  dictator Omar al-Bashir.

Haaretz previously reported that Israel had secretly deported asylum seekers from different African countries to Uganda. To this day, asylum seekers are being deported to Uganda in what Israel has called “voluntary departure.”

31 January 2020

United States Department of the Treasury (Washington, DC)

Washington, DC — The Ministers of Foreign Affairs and Water Resources of Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan and their delegations met with the Secretary of the Treasury and the President of the World Bank, participating as observers in negotiations on the filling and operation of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), in Washington, D.C. on January 28-31, 2020.  At the conclusion of the meetings, the Ministers reached an agreement on the following issues, subject to the final signing of the comprehensive agreement:

  1. a schedule for a stage based filling plan of the GERD; 
  2. a mitigation mechanism for the filling of the GERD during drought, prolonged drought, and prolonged periods of dry years; and
  3. a mitigation mechanism for the annual and long-term operation of the GERD in drought, prolonged drought, and prolonged periods of dry years.

They also discussed and agreed to finalize a mechanism for the annual and long-term operation of the GERD in normal hydrological conditions, a coordination mechanism, and provisions for the resolution of disputes and the sharing of information.  Moreover, they also agreed to address dam safety and pending studies on the environmental and social impacts of the GERD.

The Ministers have instructed their technical and legal teams to prepare the final agreement, which shall include the agreements reached above, for a signing of the three countries by the end of February, 2020.

The Ministers recognize the significant regional benefits that will result from this agreement and from the operation of the dam with respect to transboundary cooperation, regional development and economic integration.  The Ministers reaffirmed the importance of transboundary cooperation in the development of the Blue Nile to improve the lives of the people of Egypt, Ethiopia, and Sudan.

EPDP Magazines