Saturday, May 19, 2012
   
Text Size

Site Search powered by Harnnet.org

Share/Bookmark

Eritrea

Eritrea’s economic freedom score is 36.2, making its economy one of the least free in the 2012 Index. Its overall score is 0.5 point lower than last year, reflecting large declines in fiscal freedom and labor freedom. Eritrea is ranked 45th out of the 46 countries in the Sub-Saharan Africa region.

Poor governance and the lack of commitment to structural reforms continue to hamper Eritrea’s economic freedom. The country performs very poorly in many components of the Index. Long-standing problems include poor public finance management and underdeveloped legal and regulatory frameworks. The weak enforcement of property rights and the fragile rule of law have driven many people into the informal sector.

The inefficient public sector remains the largest source of employment. Monetary stability remains fragile, largely reflecting excessive money creation to fund chronic fiscal deficits. Faced with substantial uncertainty and instability, the private sector has been marginalized to a great extent by the repressive environment. Open-market policies are not in place to spur dynamic growth in trade and investment.

Background

Eritrea won its independence from Ethiopia in 1993, but relations with Ethiopia remain tense. A U.N. peacekeeping mission ended in 2008, and Eritrea has ignored a U.N. resolution instructing it to remove troops from a disputed region on the border with Djibouti. President Isaias Afwerki has ruled without elections since 1993, and elections are unlikely due to the ongoing conflict with Ethiopia. Judicial independence is limited, and journalists and others have been held without trial for speaking against the government. Roughly three-quarters of Eritreans depend on small-scale agriculture and fishing, and two-thirds of the population receives food aid. Productivity is very low, and the International Monetary Fund estimates that remittances from Eritreans living overseas were equivalent to 23 percent of GDP in 2007.

Rule of Law

The rule of law remains fragile and uneven, severely undermined by a weak and inefficient judicial system. Protection of property rights is not strongly maintained. The government has a history of expropriating houses, businesses, and other private property without notice, explanation, or compensation. Pervasive corruption and cronyism continue to erode the foundations of economic freedom.

Limited Government

The top income and corporate tax rates are 30 percent. The overall tax burden is estimated to be quite high, although taxation is erratic and poorly administered. Government spending is equivalent to 42.1 percent of total domestic output. The deficit has been chronically high at over 15 percent of GDP, with public debt amounting to 144.8 percent of total domestic income.

Regulatory Efficiency

Procedures for establishing and running a business are opaque and costly. Regulations are severely outdated and not conducive to entrepreneurial activity. The required minimum capital for launching a business is equivalent to over twice the annual average income. Existing labor regulations are not enforced effectively in the absence of a well-functioning labor market. Monetary stability has been weak, and inflationary pressures continue.

Open Markets

Eritrea’s trade freedom remains severely restricted by prohibitive tariff and non-tariff barriers. The government-controlled economy leaves little room for private investment. Large-scale projects must be approved by the appropriate Office of the President. The financial system remains very much underdeveloped. All banks are majority-owned by the state, and private-sector involvement in the system remains limited.

EPDP Magazines

English Articles

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8

Submission Guidelines

The website was constructed for the purpose of conducting a free spirited and constructive discussions and exchange of ideas amongst individuals and groups with different ideas.  All ideas that are rooted in a concept are welcomed.  There are no bad ideas but bad judgments. We also have the right to reject writings with ill intent; distorting facts, writings that attack personalities, writings that are divisive, writings that are based on hate, writings that have no verification of real address and identity.

We encourage all contributors to engage with a spirit of respect for every contributor, accept difference of ideas, focus on solution finding, bring alternative ideas, and applying a unifying tone.

Login Form